Cooperative Banks: The Piggy Banks of Local Politicians
1. Introduction: The Noble Vision vs. The Gritty Reality of Cooperative Banking
The original blueprint for the Indian cooperative banking sector was painted with strokes of idealism. It envisioned a financial ecosystem where the community pooled its resources to support its own. These institutions were designed to be the financial lifeblood for the small trader, the neighborhood vendor, and the middle class family, offering them a sanctuary away from the cold calculation of commercial banking. The motto was simple: “All for each and each for all.” Yet, in the dusty corridors of power and the backrooms of local party offices, this noble vision has decayed into something far more cynical. For decades, and with alarming frequency between 2020 and 2026, these institutions have functioned less as community chests and more as private piggy banks for the politically connected.
The transformation from community guardians to personal treasuries is not merely anecdotal; it is etched in the forensic data of regulatory crackdowns. Between 2014 and 2024, the Reserve Bank of India cancelled the licenses of 78 urban cooperative banks, a purge that accelerated significantly in the current decade. In 2024 alone, ten such banks lost their right to do business. These were not victims of mere market volatility but casualties of gross governance failure. The narrative is almost always the same: a board of directors stuffed with political appointees, loans sanctioned to friends and family without collateral, and a blind eye turned by state level auditors.
Consider the stark case of the New India Cooperative Bank. In early 2025, the facade of stability crumbled when the Economic Offences Wing arrested its former General Manager for an alleged 122 crore rupee scam. Investigations revealed that funds were siphoned off systematically between 2020 and 2025, a period when the bank was supposedly under tight scrutiny. This was not an isolated incident of a rogue employee but a structural rot where oversight mechanisms failed spectacularly. Similarly, the collapse of the CKP Cooperative Bank in May 2020 left thousands of depositors stranded, their life savings evaporated by a management team that treated the bank’s liquidity as a slush fund for real estate projects that never materialized.
The rot runs deep because the soil is fertile for corruption. The root cause lies in the “dual control” mechanism, a regulatory twilight zone that existed for decades. While the RBI handled banking functions, the Registrar of Cooperative Societies (RCS) handled management and audits. The RCS, often a state government appointee, became the conduit for political interference. Local politicians utilized this loophole to capture board seats, using the bank’s deposits to fund elections or personal ventures. By the time the RBI stepped in with penalties, the money was often long gone. In the fiscal year ending 2025, the central bank imposed a staggering 264 penalties on cooperative banks, the highest among all regulatory entities, totaling over 15 crore rupees in fines. This surge in enforcement action highlights just how widespread the compliance rot had become.
The legislative response came in the form of the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act of 2020, which aimed to bring these banks under the direct supervision of the RBI, curbing the power of the Registrar. However, the legacy of political capture is stubborn. The Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank case in Bengaluru, where a probe was handed over to the CBI in 2023, exposed how deep the nexus runs. Enforcement Directorate officials seized assets worth 45 crore rupees, uncovering a web of fictitious accounts and insider lending that had bled the bank dry.
This section investigates how the cooperative dream was hijacked. It peels back the layers of regulatory arbitrage that allowed local power brokers to weaponize public trust. We are not looking at simple bank failures; we are witnessing the systematic looting of the common depositor, facilitated by a system that allowed the fox to build the henhouse, lock the door, and hold the only key.
2. The Governance Gap: Understanding the Dual Control of State Registrars and the Central Bank
For decades, India’s cooperative banking sector operated under a unique administrative shadow known as dual control. This structural flaw allowed a dangerous governance gap to fester, effectively turning these financial institutions into personal treasuries for local power brokers. Under this system, the Reserve Bank of India oversaw banking functions, while the Registrar of Cooperative Societies (RCS), reporting to state governments, managed administrative matters like board elections and auditing. This split responsibility created a regulatory blind spot where political patronage flourished over financial prudence.
The Mechanism of Capture
The dual control model meant that while the central bank could prescribe lending norms, it lacked the direct power to remove errant directors or supersede boards without a cumbersome process involving state registrars. Politicians exploited this gap. By capturing the RCS apparatus, local leaders could pack bank boards with loyalists, sanction loans to their own sugar mills or real estate ventures, and delay audits that might reveal the rot. The result was a banking segment where credit assessment was replaced by political connection.
Between 2020 and 2026, the consequences of this governance void became undeniably clear. The collapse of the Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) Bank was the initial tremor that exposed the fault lines. Here, a single real estate group, HDIL, siphoned off nearly 73 percent of the total loan book of the bank. The board, shielding these transactions through over 21,000 dummy accounts, operated with impunity because the regulatory eyes were looking elsewhere.
Legislative Bandage and Continued Bleeding
In response to the PMC debacle, the Indian Parliament passed the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act in 2020. This law was a direct attempt to close the governance gap by giving the RBI overriding powers to supersede boards and audit cooperative banks directly. However, data from 2020 to 2026 reveals that legislative changes struggle to undo decades of entrenched corruption.
Despite the new powers, the rot persisted. In the fiscal year ending 2025, the RBI imposed a record 264 penalties on cooperative banks, the highest among all regulated entities. These penalties, totaling over 15 crore rupees, were largely for governance lapses, lending to directors, and violating exposure norms. The central bank was forced to cancel the licenses of 58 urban cooperative banks between 2020 and 2025, including prominent names like Rupee Cooperative Bank and Deccan Urban Cooperative Bank. Each cancellation represented a failure of governance where depositor money was eroded by bad loans to politically connected borrowers.
The Maharashtra Case Study
Nowhere is this gap more evident than in Maharashtra. The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank (MSCB) scam, involving allegations of a 25,000 crore rupee fraud, remained a potent political issue through 2026. The Enforcement Directorate continued its probe into how loans were disbursed to sugar factories owned by bank directors and politicians without collateral. These factories were later sold at throwaway prices to relatives of those same directors. Even as late as early 2026, legal battles continued regarding the involvement of high profile state figures, illustrating how difficult it is to untangle the nexus between cooperative finance and state politics.
- 58: Number of Urban Cooperative Bank licenses canceled by the RBI.
- 264: Number of penalties imposed on cooperative banks in FY25 alone.
- 118: Cooperative banks penalized between Dec 2024 and May 2025 for non compliance.
- 25,000 Crore: Alleged loss value in the Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank irregularities.
A System in Transition
The governance gap is slowly closing, but the cost has been high. The Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank in Karnataka serves as another grim milestone. Following its collapse, the Enforcement Directorate attached assets worth hundreds of crores, arresting key officials for money laundering. Yet, for thousands of depositors, the legislative fixes came too late. The transition from dual control to a more unitary regulatory framework is underway, but the legacy of political interference ensures that cooperative banks remain a volatile frontier in Indian finance.
3. Boardroom Capture: How Local Politicians Hijack Management Committees
The boardroom of a cooperative bank was designed to be a sanctuary of community trust. It was meant to be a place where elected representatives of depositors, often neighbours or local professionals, would gather to safeguard the savings of the community. Yet, between 2020 and 2026, this sanctuary has been systematically dismantled and rebuilt as a command centre for local political patronage. The phenomenon is known as “Boardroom Capture,” a mechanism where political heavyweights do not merely influence decisions but physically occupy the seats of power to divert public funds into private political coffers.
The mechanism of capture is deceptively simple. A local politician, often an MLA or a district party chief, gets elected to the board of directors along with a panel of loyalists. Once the management committee is dominated by a single political faction, the bank effectively ceases to function as a financial institution and begins operating as a private treasury. The checks and balances mandated by the Reserve Bank of India are overridden by the sheer weight of political authority.
The Kerala Model: The Party Treasury
The most stark illustration of this trend emerged from Thrissur, Kerala. The Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank scam, which dominated headlines from 2021 through 2024, exposed a chilling reality: the bank had been turned into a conduit for party funding. Investigations by the Enforcement Directorate in 2024 revealed that the board, controlled by local leaders of a prominent political party, had sanctioned loans to non members and benami entities.
Data from the probe painted a grim picture. Over 25 secret bank accounts were discovered, allegedly used to park undisclosed party funds. The investigation found that assets worth over Rs 100 crore were amassed illegally over a decade. The board did not just look the other way; they actively engineered the fraud. Loans were approved against the property of poor members who had no idea their land was being mortgaged. When the scam broke, it was not just a case of financial mismanagement but a betrayal of the cooperative spirit, with funds allegedly siphoned off to build party offices and fund election campaigns.
The Maharashtra Nexus: Sugar and Power
In Maharashtra, the capture takes a different form, inextricably linked to the sugar belt politics. The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank (MSCB) saga continued to unfold between 2020 and 2026, highlighting the “Sugar Baron” model of boardroom capture. Here, directors of the cooperative banks are often the owners of sugar mills. They sit on the board and sanction massive loans to their own unviable factories or those owned by their kin.
Despite closure reports filed by local police in January 2024, federal agencies continued to probe the allegations involving the sale of sugar factories at throwaway prices. The core accusation remains that the board members deliberately drove cooperative sugar mills into debt, declared them as non performing assets, and then auctioned them off to their own relatives for pennies on the dollar. This cyclical looting turned the apex cooperative bank into a personal piggy bank for the state political elite, causing an alleged loss of Rs 25,000 crore over two decades.
Regulatory Crackdown and Resistance
The scale of this capture forced the Reserve Bank of India to act with unprecedented severity in the fiscal year 2025. Data reveals that the central bank imposed penalties on 51 District Central Cooperative Banks in the 2024 to 2025 period alone. Furthermore, as of March 2025, 23 Urban Cooperative Banks were placed under All Inclusive Directions, restricting withdrawals and freezing operations to stop the bleeding. Maharashtra led this list with nine banks, followed by Karnataka with five.
In February 2025, the RBI took the drastic step of sacking the entire board of the Mumbai based New India Cooperative Bank following the discovery of Rs 122 crore in embezzled funds. This move signaled a zero tolerance approach towards governance deficits. The introduction of new rules in 2025 aimed at removing “ineligible directors” was a direct legislative attempt to break the politician board nexus. These rules mandated professional expertise for board members, a criterion often lacking in the political appointees who had previously treated these positions as ceremonial rewards.
The battle for the boardroom is far from over. As long as cooperative banks remain the primary source of easy credit for local election campaigns and patronage networks, politicians will fight to retain their seats at the table. For the depositor, however, the lesson from 2020 to 2026 is clear: when a politician enters the boardroom, prudence often leaves via the back door.
4. The Recruitment Racket: Filling Bank Staff Positions with Party Cadres and Relatives
The transformation of cooperative banks from community driven financial aids into political fiefdoms is perhaps most visible in their hiring practices. For decades, these institutions have served as unofficial employment exchanges for local politicians, but data from 2020 to 2026 reveals a systemic capture of staff positions that goes beyond simple nepotism. In many districts, the recruitment process has devolved into a formalized racket where merit is irrelevant, and the only qualifications that matter are political loyalty or the ability to pay a hefty bribe.
The Rate Card System
In states like Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, investigations have uncovered what essentially amounts to a “rate card” for various positions within the cooperative sector. Between 2024 and 2025, enforcement agencies flagged irregularities in the appointment of staff across multiple cooperative societies. In Tamil Nadu, probes into municipal and cooperative appointments suggested that candidates were paying bribes ranging from ₹25 lakh to ₹35 lakh for entry level positions. The financial rot often begins here; an employee who pays a fortune to secure a job is inevitably incentivized to recover that investment through corrupt means once hired.
The situation in Karnataka mirrors this trend. In September 2023, the state government ordered an inquiry into recruitment irregularities at the Shivamogga District Central Cooperative Bank. The probe focused on allegations that the recruitment process was tampered with to favor candidates recommended by the governing board, which is frequently dominated by local political heavyweights. Similarly, the Chikkamagaluru District Cooperative Central Bank faced scrutiny over its 2024 recruitment notification, with aspirants alleging that the selection list was predetermined to accommodate relatives of sitting directors.
The Cadre Capture Model
While some politicians treat bank jobs as items for sale, others use them to reward party foot soldiers, effectively merging the bank’s administration with the party’s local unit. This “cadre capture” model was starkly exposed during the investigation into the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank in Kerala.
Between 2021 and 2025, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) unearthed a massive scam estimated at ₹300 crore within the bank. The investigation revealed that the bank was run less like a financial institution and more like a party subsidiary. The ED chargesheet filed in 2025 explicitly named the ruling political party as an accused, a historic first, alleging that the bank was administered by a committee of party leaders rather than independent banking professionals. Staff positions were filled with party loyalists who were then instructed to sanction illegal loans to “benami” borrowers (proxies) without adequate collateral. These employees, owing their livelihoods to the party rather than the bank, bypassed all due diligence protocols. The result was a flood of bad loans that devastated the savings of thousands of depositors, many of whom were retirees dependent on their interest income.
Consequences of Competence Deficit
The recruitment of unqualified staff has catastrophic downstream effects on bank operations. In Madhya Pradesh, a 2021 fraud case at the Shivpuri District Cooperative Bank highlighted the dangers of placing incompetent individuals in sensitive roles. Police investigations revealed that a peon had been promoted to the position of cashier, a role for which he lacked the necessary financial training. This individual, along with the bank manager, was implicated in a significant embezzlement scheme. Such appointments compromise the internal audit mechanisms that are supposed to prevent fraud.
Furthermore, the lack of professional management was a key factor in the collapse of the New India Cooperative Bank in Maharashtra. In 2025, the bank was rocked by a ₹122 crore embezzlement scandal involving its General Manager. The ease with which funds were siphoned off over a five year period (2020 to 2025) points to a staff that was either complicit or too unskilled to detect the irregularities in the ledger books.
The Data Speaks: A 2024 audit of cooperative societies in Tamil Nadu found financial irregularities totaling ₹22 crore in just two years across 231 societies. The Salem District Central Cooperative Bank alone accounted for nearly ₹6 crore of this amount, a figure attributed partly to staff complicity and poor administrative oversight resulting from irregular appointments.
The recruitment racket creates a vicious cycle. Politicians hire compliant staff to facilitate looting; the staff sanctions bad loans to political patrons; and when the loans turn bad, the bank collapses, leaving the taxpayer and the depositor to foot the bill. As long as cooperative banks remain the personal piggy banks of local leaders, this pipeline of corruption will continue to pump toxic assets into the Indian financial system.
5. Lending to Liability: Analyzing the Ratio of Loans Given to Directors’ Business Interests
The structural flaw at the heart of many Indian cooperative banks is not merely incompetence but a deliberate design feature. For decades, these institutions have functioned less as custodians of public trust and more as private treasuries for their board members. The phenomenon is simple yet devastating. Local politicians and influential businessmen get elected as directors, then use the bank deposits to fund their own ventures or those of their kin. Between 2020 and 2026, this practice of insider lending transformed from a quiet open secret into a loud systemic crisis, forcing the Reserve Bank of India to impose record penalties.
The Mechanism of Misappropriation
The modus operandi remains remarkably consistent across states. A director identifies a personal business need or a political campaign requiring funds. Instead of seeking credit from commercial banks where scrutiny is high, they turn to the cooperative bank they control. The loan is sanctioned bypassing standard collateral norms. Often, these loans are routed through shell entities or distant relatives to evade immediate detection. When repayment stalls, the board simply “evergreens” the loan, issuing a fresh facility to pay off the interest on the old one, keeping the account standard on paper while the asset rots in reality.
Case Study: The AP Mahesh Cooperative Urban Bank Scandal
A stark example surfaced in Hyderabad with the AP Mahesh Cooperative Urban Bank. In investigations spanning 2024 and 2025, enforcement agencies uncovered a deep rot. The Enforcement Directorate, in September 2025, provisionally attached properties worth Rs 1.1 crore connected to the bank senior management. The probe revealed that senior officials, including the then Chairman and Managing Director, allegedly sanctioned loans exceeding Rs 300 crore to ineligible borrowers. These borrowers provided illegal collaterals, such as Wakf Board lands or nonexistent properties. In return, the accused allegedly charged a commission of 2 percent to 4 percent of the loan amount.
The data from this investigation highlights the ratio disparity. While genuine small depositors struggled for minor loans, hundreds of crores flowed to entities linked to the management network. The breakdown of trust was absolute. By late 2025, allegations surfaced that the bank suffered losses exceeding Rs 327 crore due to these irregularities, a direct transfer of wealth from middle class depositors to politically connected elites.
The Karnataka Crisis: Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank
The scale of insider lending reached tragic proportions in Bengaluru with the Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha. Between 2020 and 2023, investigations exposed a scam worth over Rs 1000 crore. The Enforcement Directorate found that management created fictitious loan accounts to siphon off public deposits. The money did not vanish; it moved into the pockets of defaulters who were often associates of the board. In March 2023, authorities attached assets worth Rs 114.19 crore. The ratio of secured to unsecured lending was inverted, with vast sums advanced without proper security to insiders, leaving thousands of senior citizen depositors destitute.
Regulatory Crackdown: The 2024 Surge in Penalties
The Reserve Bank of India responded with aggression. Data from the financial year 2024 to 2025 shows a massive spike in regulatory interventions. The central bank imposed 215 penalties on Urban Cooperative Banks in that single fiscal year alone. A significant portion of these fines specifically targeted loans to directors.
In November 2024, the RBI levied fines on multiple Gujarat based lenders, including the Rajula Nagrik Sahakari Bank and the Vijay Commercial Cooperative Bank. The specific citation in the penalty orders was “sanctioning loans to directors or their relatives.” In July 2024, the Mehsana Urban Cooperative Bank faced a penalty of Rs 5.93 crore for similar violations, including lending to director related entities. These are not clerical errors. They represent a systemic looting where the loan book becomes a liability, weighted down by friends and family who have no intention of repayment.
The evidence from 2020 to 2026 is clear. When directors treat a bank as a piggy bank, the ratio of insider loans rises until it collapses the entire institution. The cost is never borne by the politicians who take the money, but always by the local depositors who trusted them.
“`html
The Sugar and Spinning Nexus: Financing Unviable Agro Processing Units for Political Gain
In the heart of India’s cooperative movement, a sinister cycle of lending and liquidation has turned community banks into private coffers for the political elite. Section 6 of our investigative series, “Cooperative Banks: The Piggy Banks of Local Politicians,” uncovers the mechanism behind the systematic looting of public deposits.
The original vision of cooperative banking was simple: pool resources to uplift the local agrarian economy. However, between 2020 and 2026, this vision was repeatedly hijacked by what investigators now call the “Sugar and Spinning Nexus.” This model involves a cooperative bank, controlled by a political heavyweight, lending vast sums to unviable sugar factories or spinning mills—often controlled by the same politician or their proxies. When these units inevitably fail, the losses are socialized among thousands of small depositors, while the assets are privatized at throwaway prices.
The Mechanism of Extraction
The modus operandi is brazenly simple. A bank chairman sanctions loans to agro processing units despite negative net worth or poor credit ratings. These loans are ostensibly for capacity expansion or working capital. In reality, the funds often service political patronage networks or cover operational inefficiencies.
When the unit defaults, the loan is classified as a Non Performing Asset (NPA). Under the guise of recovery, the bank auctions the factory. The buyer? Frequently a private entity linked to the very directors who sanctioned the bad loan. The factory moves from cooperative ownership to private hands, cleansed of debt, while the bank is left with a balance sheet hole.
Case Study: The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Saga
The most prominent example of this nexus is the alleged scam involving the Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank (MSC Bank). Enforcement agencies have estimated the irregularities at over ₹25,000 crore. The investigation, which remained active through 2024, highlighted how cooperative sugar factories (SSKs) were sold illegally.
Earlier in July 2021, the ED attached assets worth over ₹65 crore of the Jarandeshwar Sahkari Sugar Karkhana in Satara. Investigators claimed the mill was auctioned in 2010 at a reserve price significantly lower than its valuation. The purchaser was a proxy firm, effectively transferring a public cooperative asset into the private portfolio of political families. This pattern illustrates the “loan to own” strategy where bank financing facilitates the eventual private takeover of public infrastructure.
Seva Vikas Bank: The Spinning Wheel of Fraud
While sugar mills dominate the headlines, the spinning mill sector follows an identical trajectory. The collapse of the Pune based Seva Vikas Cooperative Bank offers a grim look at this reality. In 2023 and continuing into investigations in 2026, the nexus was laid bare.
The bank was stripped of its license after audits revealed a staggering 92 percent of its loan book had turned bad. The former chairman, Amar Mulchandani, was arrested for running the bank as a personal fiefdom. Investigators found that loans were sanctioned to shell entities and unviable textile units with no intention of repayment. By January 2026, the Maharashtra CID had expanded the net, arresting associates linked to fraudulent land deals financed by these very siphoned funds. The “spinning” here was not of cotton, but of money laundering cycles that left over 100,000 depositors in limbo.
Regulatory Crackdown and the Road Ahead
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has attempted to sever this nexus. Following the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act 2020, the central bank intensified its scrutiny. Between 2020 and 2025, the RBI cancelled the licenses of 58 Urban Cooperative Banks. In 2025 alone, the spotlight turned to the New India Cooperative Bank in Mumbai, where a ₹122 crore cash siphon was uncovered, leading to immediate restrictions on withdrawals.
Despite these measures, the political entanglement remains deep. The data from 2020 to 2026 suggests that as long as bank boards are populated by active politicians, the temptation to finance unviable agro processing units for electoral or personal gain will persist. The cost is paid not just in rupees lost, but in the erosion of trust in the very institutions designed to protect the rural saver.
Data sources: Enforcement Directorate press releases (2021, 2024), RBI Notifications (2023, 2025), and court filings related to the MSC Bank and Seva Vikas Bank cases.
“““html
7. Benami Borrowers: Uncovering Ghost Loans Disbursed to Fictitious Entities
The ledger books of India’s cooperative banks often tell two stories. One is a tale of community empowerment, where small loans support local farmers and traders. The other, however, is a work of fiction. This second narrative features borrowers who do not exist, collateral that is worth nothing, and debts that are never meant to be repaid. In the murky world of political finance, these are known as “benami” loans. They serve as the primary mechanism for siphoning public deposits into the pockets of power brokers. Between 2020 and 2026, investigative agencies have peeled back the layers of this mechanism, revealing a systemic rot where ghost borrowers haunt the balance sheets of cooperative lenders.
The Anatomy of a Ghost Loan
A benami transaction involves a financial transfer where the real beneficiary is not the person named in the documents. In the context of cooperative banks, this translates to loans sanctioned to individuals who are either unaware of the borrowing or are entirely fictitious. The money, however, flows directly to political handlers or real estate mafias. The cooperative structure, designed for local autonomy, becomes a perfect shield for these operations because oversight is often diluted by regional political influence.
Case Study: The Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank Crisis
The unraveling of the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank in Kerala stands as the definitive example of this era. While the scam first surfaced in 2021, the depth of the deception became clear through investigations continuing into 2024 and 2025. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) revealed that the bank was run like a personal treasury for local political leaders.
Investigators found that loans were systematically disbursed to benami entities. One specific instance highlighted in 2023 involved a real estate agent named Kiran P P, who received 50 separate loans. These facilities were sanctioned in his name and the names of various proxies, totaling 245.6 million rupees. By the time the registry reported on the issue in late 2022, the liability on these specific accounts had ballooned to 485.7 million rupees due to interest accumulation. The genuine members of the cooperative, whose land deeds were pledged without consent, were left facing foreclosure notices for debts they never incurred.
By 2025, the ED had attached assets worth over 290 million rupees linked to the accused, including properties belonging to local political functionaries. The investigation alleged that proceeds from these ghost loans were used to fund election campaigns and purchase party offices, effectively turning depositor funds into political capital.
The Bengaluru Deception
A similar script played out in Karnataka with the Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank. The crisis here erupted when the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) imposed restrictions in early 2020, but the fallout continued well into the middle of the decade. By 2023, the case had been handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) as the scale of “ghost accounts” became apparent.
The management had created thousands of fictitious deposit accounts to mask bad loans. These entries were used to balance the books artificially, hiding the fact that massive sums had been lent to a select few associates without adequate security. The bank claimed to have robust assets, but in reality, over 15 billion rupees were at risk. The investigation revealed that a single borrower had siphoned approximately 400 million rupees, a sum that was supposed to be distributed among hundreds of small borrowers.
The Gold Loan Mirage
Ghost loans do not always involve missing people; sometimes they involve missing collateral. In September 2024, a sophisticated “bangle scam” rocked cooperative societies in Kasaragod. Perpetrators pledged gold filled bangles—ornaments that were mostly copper with a thin gold layer—to secure loans worth hundreds of thousands.
Because cooperative bank appraisers were often complicit or untrained, these fake ornaments were valued as pure gold. In 2021, the Kerala Cooperation Minister revealed to the assembly that fraudsters had secured nearly 110 million rupees against fake gold in just a few years. By 2025, similar patterns emerged in Doddaballapura, where the ED initiated proceedings after discovering that loans were disbursed against “gold” that did not exist in the vault at all.
Regulatory Countermeasures
The Reserve Bank of India has intensified its scrutiny of these practices. Data from the 2024 to 2025 fiscal year shows a sharp spike in penalties targeting cooperative lenders. The central bank imposed 264 penalties on cooperative banks during this period, a rise of roughly 23 percent from the previous year. The total monetary value of these fines reached 156.3 million rupees.
Total Penalties on Cooperative Banks: 264
Increase from Previous Year: 22.8%
Total Penalty Amount: 156.3 Million Rupees
These penalties were frequently cited for “non adherence to regulatory norms,” a polite euphemism for the reckless sanctioning of loans to directors and their relatives. Despite these actions, the benami culture persists. The intimate connection between local politicians and cooperative board members creates a closed loop where regulatory notices are often ignored until the bank collapses, leaving the common depositor to pick up the tab.
“““html
Section 8: Collateral Inflation: The Art of Overvaluing Land to Sanction Excessive Credit
The most rudimentary yet devastating method used to drain a cooperative bank is the deliberate inflation of collateral value. In this scheme, a plot of land worth a mere few lakhs is magically appraised at several crores on paper. This inflated figure allows the bank management, often acting under the directive of local political heavyweights, to sanction massive loans that far exceed the actual worth of the security. When the borrower inevitably defaults, the bank is left holding a title deed to a property that covers only a fraction of the lost funds.
Between 2020 and 2026, this mechanism transformed from a sporadic fraud into a systemic tool for embezzlement across India. The investigation into the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank in Kerala provides the most glaring evidence of this practice. Investigators found that loans were sanctioned to individuals who were merely benamis or proxies for political leaders. The crux of the scam, which the Enforcement Directorate estimated at over Rs 180 crore, relied heavily on the fabrication of land valuation reports.
“Loans were found to be issued to several persons by exaggerating the value of the land pledged. The bank is left with documents for swamp land priced as prime commercial real estate.”
In the Karuvannur case, which saw intense legal action through 2024 and 2025, the political nexus was undeniable. The Enforcement Directorate attached assets worth Rs 57 crore in October 2023 and continued attachments into 2025, revealing that funds siphoned through these overvalued loans were diverted for party activities and personal enrichment of senior leaders. The valuation process, theoretically an independent check, was entirely compromised. Surveyors and bank appraisers, pressured by the board of directors, signed off on valuations that had no basis in reality.
A similar pattern emerged in Karnataka with the Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank. While the scam first came to light earlier, the depth of the valuation fraud became apparent to the public between 2020 and 2024. Here, the total scam size ballooned to an eye watering Rs 2,402 crore. The investigations revealed that the management had sanctioned loans without adequate security or by accepting collateral that was grossly overvalued. By the time the Reserve Bank of India stepped in to cap withdrawals, thousands of depositors were already trapped. The “collateral” on the books was essentially phantom wealth, created solely to justify the transfer of depositor money into the pockets of the influential elite.
The Reserve Bank of India attempted to crack down on this specific malpractice during the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. Data shows that cooperative banks topped the penalty charts in 2024. In January 2026 alone, the central bank imposed penalties on multiple cooperative entities for breaches related to lending norms and exposure limits. For instance, the Bharat Cooperative Bank in Bengaluru faced penalties for sanctioning loans not backed by proper collateral security. These regulatory actions highlight that despite the high profile crashes, the practice of manipulating valuation reports remains a preferred method for extraction.
The tragedy of collateral inflation is that it is mathematically irreversible for the bank. Unlike a bad business loan where the underlying asset might recover value, a fraudulently valued asset was never worth the loan amount in the first place. The money is not lost to market forces; it is stolen at the moment of sanction. For the local politician, the cooperative bank serves not as a lending institution but as a private treasury where land documents are merely symbolic tokens exchanged for hard cash.
“““html
9. Evergreening Tactics: Issuing New Loans to Service Defaulted Debts and Hide NPAs
The survival of a compromised cooperative bank depends on a single, fragile illusion: that its borrowers are solvent. When politically connected borrowers stop paying, compliant boards do not declare a default. Instead, they deploy “evergreening,” a financial sleight of hand designed to bury Non Performing Assets (NPAs) under layers of fresh credit. Between 2020 and 2026, this practice evolved from simple loan refreshing to complex structured obligations, turning local lenders into personal piggy banks for the powerful.
The Mechanics of Deception
Evergreening in the cooperative sector is rarely subtle. The most common method involves “accommodation bills” or fresh sanction letters issued days before a previous loan becomes a bad asset. In the audit books, the borrower appears to have repaid the principal. In reality, the bank has merely printed new money to pay itself, inflating its asset book while the actual quality of credit rots. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) identified this as a critical failure point in its 2023 and 2024 inspection cycles, noting that boards often sanctioned new credit facilities to entities related to the defaulting borrower to mask the original stress.
Case Study: The Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Implosion
The collapse of the Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank in Bengaluru serves as a textbook example of how evergreening facilitates looting. By early 2020, the bank had ceased to function as a lender and operated effectively as a Ponzi scheme. Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigations revealed that management created fictitious loan accounts to transfer funds into overdue accounts. This accounting gymnastics artificially suppressed NPA numbers, presenting a healthy balance sheet to depositors.
Real data from the investigation showed that over Rs 1000 crore in public deposits were misappropriated. The bank offered interest rates far above the market average to attract fresh liquidity, which was then used to service the interest obligations of dead loans linked to influential insiders. When the music stopped, thousands of depositors were left stranded, their life savings evaporated into the ledger entries of ghost borrowers.
The AIF Loophole and Regulatory Whac A Mole
As direct loan renewals attracted scrutiny, sophisticated banks shifted to Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). In this model, a cooperative bank would invest in an AIF, which would then lend that same money to the bank’s defaulting borrower. The borrower would use these funds to repay the original loan. The bank’s books would show a repaid loan and a new “investment,” effectively hiding the bad debt.
The RBI moved to plug this gap in December 2023, barring regulated entities from investing in AIFs that had downstream investments in their debtor companies. Despite this, the lag between regulation and enforcement allowed hundreds of crores to be cycled through this route. In the fiscal year 2024 2025, the RBI imposed penalties on 264 cooperative banks, a sharp 22.8 percent rise from the previous year, with many citations specifically targeting “irregularities in loan classification” and “exposure to directors.”
The New India Cooperative Bank Scandal
The persistence of these tactics was highlighted again in early 2025 with the exposure of irregularities at the New India Cooperative Bank. Investigations launched in February 2025 revealed that cash was siphoned directly from vaults and lockers, while book entries were manipulated to cover the shortfall. Prime accused Hitesh Mehta and associates were alleged to have extracted over Rs 122 crore. Political accusations followed immediately, with rival parties blaming each other for shielding the management, further proving that regulatory oversight often fails when political patronage protects the boardroom.
The Statistical Mirage
Official data paints a comforting but misleading picture. The gross NPA ratio of Urban Cooperative Banks reportedly dropped to 7.6 percent by September 2025 from a high of 15.4 percent in 2021. However, investigative analysis suggests this improvement is partly due to aggressive write offs and the successful evergreening of large ticket loans that have yet to be classified as bad. The exit of nearly 65 weak banks from the Supervisory Action Framework (SAF) in 2025 was celebrated as a recovery, yet the underlying asset quality in many “turned around” banks remains opaque.
For the local politician, the cooperative bank remains the ultimate instrument of leverage: a source of endless credit where the principal is never truly due, provided the books can be cooked for one more quarter.
“`
Section 10. Election Year Economics: Tracing Cash Outflows During Campaign Cycles
The symbiotic relationship between local politicians and cooperative banks in India is an open secret, yet the scale of financial manipulation during election cycles continues to stun regulators. Between 2020 and 2026, despite the Banking Regulation Amendment Act of 2020 bringing urban cooperative banks under the direct supervision of the Reserve Bank of India, these institutions remained primary conduits for campaign finance. The mechanism is simple: cooperative banks, often chaired by politicians or their close aides, approve dubious loans, inflate operational costs, or manipulate recruitment drives to generate liquid cash just before polls open.
The Karnataka Model: 2023 Assembly Elections
The 2023 Karnataka Assembly elections provided a textbook example of this phenomenon. In April 2023, income tax officials raided multiple cooperative banks across the state. The findings were staggering. Investigators detected bogus expenditures amounting to ₹1000 crore. These funds were allegedly siphoned out to fund election campaigns. Furthermore, officials seized unaccounted cash loans worth ₹15 crore during the same raids. The timing was precise; the money moved when campaign fervor was at its peak.
Another disturbing trend surfaced in the Shivamogga District Cooperative Central Bank in 2024. Allegations emerged regarding a recruitment scam where 98 staff positions were sold for sums ranging between ₹45 lakh and ₹50 lakh each. In a brazen loop of corruption, the bank granted loans to these fresh recruits on their very first day of service, enabling them to pay the bribes back to the directors. This liquidity injection into the hands of the bank management, heavily populated by political figures, occurred conveniently close to the election cycle.
The 2024 General Election Surge
As India approached the 2024 General Elections, the stress on these local financial institutions became visible. The Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank scandal, involving a misappropriation of ₹2500 crore, became a central campaign issue in Bangalore South. Depositors heckled sitting MPs, demanding answers for the lost savings that had fueled dubious real estate ventures. The Enforcement Directorate attached assets worth ₹159 crore, but for thousands of depositors, the money was gone.
In Maharashtra, another hub of cooperative banking, cash seizures intensified. In November 2024, just days before state assembly polls, authorities seized ₹1.98 crore in cash from a hotel in Nashik. The trail led back to networks deeply entrenched in the local cooperative credit sector, which has long served as the war chest for regional power brokers.
Regulatory Backlash: 2025 and 2026
The Reserve Bank of India responded with unprecedented aggression in the fiscal year 2024 2025. Data from the Annual Report released in May 2025 showed that cooperative banks faced the highest number of penalties among all regulated entities. The central bank imposed 264 separate penalties on cooperative banks, totaling ₹15.63 crore. This was a direct response to the compliance failures observed during the election fever of the previous year.
By early 2026, the crackdown revealed even deeper rot. In February 2026, the New India Cooperative Bank faced turmoil with the arrest of a senior executive connected to a ₹122 crore embezzlement case. The fraud, spanning from 2020 to 2025, involved manipulating accounts to siphon funds, a portion of which is suspected to have lubricated political machinery during the intervening election years.
Conclusion
The data from 2020 to 2026 paints a clear picture. While the 2020 regulatory amendments were designed to curb malpractice, local politicians adapted by finding new methods to extract capital. From bogus expenses in Karnataka to direct cash seizures in Maharashtra, cooperative banks remain the piggy banks of choice for the political class. The record number of penalties in 2025 suggests that while the regulator is watching, the allure of easy campaign cash remains a powerful temptation for those who control the keys to the vault.
“`html
11. The Audit Masquerade: How Compromised Auditors Sign Off on Cooked Books
The most dangerous fiction in the Indian banking sector is not the political promise of loan waivers but the statutory audit report of a compromised cooperative bank. For decades, these reports served as the final veil over systemic looting, offering a veneer of respectability to institutions that had long since been hollowed out by their political masters. Between 2020 and 2026, this veil was ruthlessly torn apart, revealing a nexus between bank management and auditors so deep that it arguably constitutes a criminal conspiracy against the public depositor.
The scandal at the Mumbai based New India Cooperative Bank in 2025 stands as the definitive case study of this failure. For years, the bank bore the prestigious ‘A’ grade rating, a badge that signaled supreme financial health to its thousands of depositors. Yet, in February 2025, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) uncovered a staggering reality: 122 crore rupees in hard cash was missing from the bank’s vaults. It had not been stolen in a heist; it had simply evaporated through book entries. The subsequent police investigation in August 2025 led to the charge sheeting of three separate audit firms—Sanjay Rane Associates, SI Mogul and Company, and Shinde Nayak and Associates. These guardians of financial integrity had signed off on the bank’s health year after year. Police files reveal that the auditors relied entirely on the word of the General Manager, Hitesh Mehta, who allegedly provided fake documents while clearing the auditors’ bills with prompt efficiency. The ‘A’ grade was not a metric of health but a purchased commodity.
This phenomenon of the “copy paste audit” was not an isolated incident in Mumbai. It mirrored the catastrophic implosion of the Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank (SGRSBN) in Bengaluru earlier in the decade. When the scam fully surfaced around 2020 and 2021, investigators found that a colossal 1,480 crore rupees had been misappropriated. The mechanism was rudimentary yet effective: the management created fictitious loan accounts to transfer money, which was then routed back to pay off overdue loans. This “evergreening” tactic kept the Non Performing Assets (NPA) ratio artificially low. The statutory and concurrent auditors, whose primary duty is to verify the existence of borrowers and security, failed to notice that 60 percent of the bank’s loans were concentrated in just 24 accounts. These were not minor oversight errors; they were deliberate acts of blindness facilitating the loot of public funds.
The regulatory backlash from the RBI between 2024 and 2026 indicates the scale of the rot. Data from the central bank shows that in the financial year 2024 to 2025 alone, the regulator imposed 264 penalties on cooperative banks, a sharp rise of nearly 23 percent from the previous year. The total penalty amount surged to over 15 crore rupees. These penalties were often the first public signal that the audit reports were fiction. In severe cases, the RBI was forced to take the extreme step of license cancellation. The Banaras Mercantile Cooperative Bank lost its license in July 2024, followed by the cancellation of the Lucknow based HCBL Cooperative Bank’s license which became effective in May 2025. In both instances, the RBI cited “inadequate capital and earning prospects,” a polite regulatory euphemism for a balance sheet that had been fictionalized for years until the money ran out.
The crisis at the Pune based Rupee Cooperative Bank, which finally saw its license cancelled in 2022, further illustrates the long term damage of audit failure. The bank had been under directions for years, yet the audits failed to trigger timely corrective action until the accumulated losses made recovery impossible. The pattern is consistent: auditors, often appointed from a local pool familiar with the bank’s politically connected directors, act as enablers rather than watchdogs. They validate the “cooked books,” allowing the management to siphon funds for political campaigns or personal enrichment while the depositor sleeps soundly, comforted by a fraudulent ‘A’ rating.
As we look at the debris of the cooperative banking sector in 2026, it is clear that the statutory audit has lost its credibility. The arrest of partners from major audit firms in the New India Cooperative Bank case marks a turning point, signaling that the legal immunity often enjoyed by these financial gatekeepers is ending. However, for the thousands of depositors waiting for insurance claims from the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation, the realization comes too late. They trusted the bank because they trusted the audit. That trust was the piggy bank, and the auditors held the hammer that smashed it.
“`
Cooperative Banks: The Piggy Banks of Local Politicians
Section 12: Money Laundering Mechanisms: Using Cooperatives to Clean Black Money
The humble cooperative bank, originally designed to empower the rural farmer and the small trader, has increasingly morphed into a private treasury for local political elites. Between 2020 and 2026, a disturbing pattern emerged across India where these institutions were not just mismanaged but actively weaponized to launder illicit funds. The mechanism is simple yet devastating: politicians capture the board, bypass regulatory oversight, and turn public deposits into private wealth.
The scale of this rot was laid bare in the financial year 2024 to 2025. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) imposed a staggering 264 penalties on cooperative banks, the highest among all banking sectors. These were not minor clerical errors. They were symptoms of a systemic collapse in governance, specifically failures in Know Your Customer (KYC) norms and Anti Money Laundering (AML) protocols. The total penalty amount for this period stood at ₹15.63 crore, a figure that serves as a mere tuition fee for the billions siphoned off in actual scams.
In May 2025, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) filed a chargesheet naming a major political party in Kerala as an accused in the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank scam. This marked the first time a political party was directly implicated under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for using a cooperative bank to fund party infrastructure.
The Ghost Borrower Mechanism
The most common method for cleaning black money is the creation of “ghost borrowers.” In the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank case, investigators found that loans were sanctioned to non members using fake addresses. More brazenly, a single property deed would be pledged as collateral for multiple loans to different individuals. The proceeds from these fraudulent loans were then funneled back to political handlers.
By 2024, the ED had attached assets worth over ₹29 crore linked to this scam. The investigation revealed that the bank was run by a “party subcommittee” rather than a professional board. Funds siphoned from depositor accounts were used to purchase land for party offices and fund election campaigns. The cooperative structure allowed these transactions to bypass the rigorous scrutiny faced by commercial banks, effectively turning the bank into a laundromat for political funding.
The Cash Vault Heist
While some schemes involve complex paper trails, others are crude thefts disguised as banking operations. In February 2025, the Mumbai Police arrested the general manager of the New India Cooperative Bank for misappropriating ₹122 crore. The mechanism here was shockingly direct: cash was simply removed from the vaults over a period of years. To hide the theft, the management created fictitious entries in the books.
This case highlighted a critical vulnerability. Cooperative banks often lack the sophisticated digital auditing tools used by larger private banks. A compromised general manager, acting in collusion with politically connected board members, can physically remove cash generated from bribes or kickbacks, replacing it with digital IOUs that never get repaid.
Shell Entities and Fictitious Loans
A more sophisticated laundering technique involves the use of shell entities. The Karnala Nagari Sahakari Bank scam offers a textbook example. In July 2025, assets worth ₹380 crore were restituted to the state authority. The mastermind, a former MLA, had created 67 fictitious loan accounts. These loans were sanctioned to entities like trusts and firms that existed only on paper but were controlled by the politician and his family.
The money moved from the bank to these shell entities, appearing as legitimate business loans. Once transferred, the funds were used to buy real estate and high value assets. When the loans inevitably turned into Non Performing Assets (NPAs), the bank wrote them off or kept them hidden to avoid detection. By the time the RBI intervened, the capital was gone, laundered into clean property assets owned by the political family.
Regulatory Crackdown and Future Outlook
The impunity is slowly ending. In July 2024, the RBI issued new Master Directions on Fraud Risk Management, explicitly holding board members accountable. The surge in penalties in late 2025 indicates a zero tolerance approach. However, as long as local politicians retain the power to appoint compliant boards and influence state level registrars, the cooperative sector will remain vulnerable.
The data from 2020 to 2026 paints a clear picture: without depoliticizing the boardroom, cooperative banks will continue to serve as the piggy banks for the powerful, leaving the common depositor to pay the price.
“`html
Section 13. Real Estate Speculation: Diverting Depositor Funds into High Risk Land Deals
The transition of cooperative banks from community lenders to private piggy banks for the political elite is nowhere more visible than in the real estate sector. Between 2020 and 2026, a disturbing pattern emerged across India where depositor funds were systematically diverted into volatile property markets. This was not merely bad investment strategy but a calculated mechanism of fraud. Local politicians, controlling bank boards, utilized these institutions to finance speculative land deals that commercial banks refused to touch. The Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank in Kerala and the Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank in Karnataka stand as the most damning examples of this trend.
The Kerala Model: Party Offices on Public Money
The scandal at the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank in Thrissur, Kerala, exposed in 2021, provides a textbook case of political capture. Controlled by a board led by local leaders of the CPI(M), the bank became a funding engine for real estate maneuvers. Investigations by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) between 2023 and 2025 revealed that the bank sanctioned illegal loans to select real estate players who acted as proxies (benamis) for political figures.
The modus operandi was simple yet devastating. The bank board approved “loan takeovers” where they issued massive new loans to cover bad debts of favored borrowers, often against inflated property valuations. In one egregious instance detailed in ED charge sheets from 2024, a single real estate player named Kiran P.P. received 51 loans worth over ₹24 crore. These funds were not used for genuine development but were siphoned off for land acquisition and, alarmingly, party activities.
“The investigation has revealed that funds collected were partly utilized for local expenses, party meetings, and acquisition of land for party offices in Thrissur district.” — Enforcement Directorate filing, High Court of Kerala (April 2025)
By early 2026, the total estimated loss in the Karuvannur scam stood between ₹100 crore and ₹400 crore. The attached assets included land parcels registered in the names of benami borrowers who held no capacity to repay. The depositors, many of whom were pensioners relying on interest income, were left destitute while the political machinery fought legal battles over the attached properties.
The Bengaluru Job: The Evergreening Trap
A similar script played out in Bengaluru, Karnataka. The Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank collapsed under the weight of massive non performing assets (NPAs) that were hidden for years. The crisis, which began with RBI restrictions in January 2020, spiraled into a massive money laundering investigation. By 2025, the ED had attached assets worth over ₹114 crore, consisting primarily of vacant lands, industrial buildings, and residential houses.
Here too, the funds were diverted to a cartel of real estate developers and defaulters with deep political connections. The bank management, led by politically influential figures, created fictitious loan accounts to transfer money to overdue accounts. This practice, known as “evergreening,” kept the balance sheet looking clean while the actual cash was funneled into speculative land banks. When the real estate market stagnated during the pandemic years of 2020 and 2021, the scheme collapsed.
In July 2025, the ED widened its net to the Shushruti Souharda Sahakara Bank, raiding 15 locations in Bengaluru. The investigation found that the chairman and directors had siphoned ₹110 crore to purchase properties in their own names and those of their relatives. The loans were sanctioned without collateral, treating the bank vault as a personal treasury for acquiring land assets.
The Regulatory Gap
The failure of the “dual control” model, where state registrars oversee management while the RBI oversees banking functions, allowed these scams to fester. While the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act of 2020 aimed to bring these banks under stricter RBI supervision, the implementation faced resistance from the political lobby. As of February 2026, thousands of depositors in Kerala and Karnataka remain in limbo, their life savings tied up in litigation over land parcels that were bought with their stolen money. The cooperative movement, intended to liberate the poor from money lenders, has ironically been weaponized by the political class to become the very thing it sought to destroy.
“`Here is the investigative section, written in HTML format, adhering to the constraints of no hyphens and using real data from 2020 to 2026.
“`html
14. The Quid Pro Quo: Vote Bank Politics and Loan Waivers
The humble cooperative bank in India was designed as a financial lifeline for the rural poor. Yet, between 2020 and 2026, investigative records show these institutions morphed into private treasuries for local political elites. This transformation is not accidental but structural. The data reveals a symbiotic toxicity: politicians use bank funds to finance their empires and elections, while the resulting bad loans are washed away by populist waiver schemes that destroy the credit culture.
The Sugar Baron Nexus
Nowhere is this capture more evident than in Maharashtra. The state’s cooperative sector is dominated by “Sugar Barons,” politicians who control both the sugar factories and the District Central Cooperative Banks (DCCBs) that lend to them. This closed loop allows for reckless lending without due diligence.
The consequences were starkly visible in early 2025. Following aggressive pre election promises of loan waivers, borrowers stopped repaying en masse. Data from the State Level Bankers Committee reveals a catastrophic spike in bad loans. By March 31, 2025, agricultural Non Performing Assets (NPAs) in the Maharashtra cooperative sector surged to 24.11 percent, a steep rise from 17.85 percent just three months prior in December 2024. In monetary terms, the bad loans jumped to Rs 8,214 crore in a single quarter.
While public sector banks saw a decline in bad loans during the same period, cooperative banks faced a liquidity crisis. The expectation of a political bailout prompted wealthy farmers to default willfully, leaving the banks with empty coffers.
The Karuvannur Model: Siphoning for Party Funds
If Maharashtra represents the waiver trap, Kerala illustrates direct extraction. The scandal at the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank, exposed fully between 2021 and 2024, provides a textbook case of political looting. Controlled by a local committee of a ruling political party, the bank diverted over Rs 150 crore.
The investigation found that the bank granted multiple loans on the same property pledge without the knowledge of the original borrower. While the political leadership used the funds for “organizational expenses,” thousands of depositors, many of them pensioners, were denied access to their life savings. The crisis led to tragic outcomes, including the suicide of depositors who could not withdraw money for medical emergencies.
The Waiver Cycle and Moral Hazard
The political utility of these banks peaks during election cycles. The “loan waiver” is the ultimate tool for vote buying. In states like Punjab, Karnataka, and Telangana, waiver announcements between 2022 and 2024 created a moral hazard where honest repayment is penalized.
When a state government announces a waiver, it technically agrees to reimburse the bank. However, the disbursement of these funds from the state exchequer to the cooperative bank often takes years. In the interim, the bank holds a “receivable” on its balance sheet that generates no interest. This liquidity crunch forces the bank to restrict new lending, choking the very farmers the scheme claimed to help.
Regulatory Whip: The License Cancellations
Recognizing this systemic rot, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) initiated a “cleaning house” approach. Armed with amended powers under the Banking Regulation Act, the central bank became aggressive against politically exposed banks.
Between 2020 and 2025, the RBI cancelled the licenses of dozens of cooperative banks. In May 2025 alone, the license of the Lucknow based HCBL Cooperative Bank was cancelled due to “inadequate capital and poor earning prospects.” The data shows a clear trend: in FY 2024 25, the RBI imposed 215 penalties on Urban Cooperative Banks for violations ranging from lending to directors to flouting Know Your Customer (KYC) norms.
The cancellation of a license is the final blow. While the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) covers deposits up to Rs 5 lakh, any amount above this threshold is often lost forever. The politician moves on to the next election; the depositor is left holding the empty piggy bank.
“““html
Section 15. Regulatory Blind Spots: Why State Governments Shield Corrupt Boards from Scrutiny
The architecture of financial ruin in the Indian cooperative banking sector is rarely accidental. It is designed. While the Reserve Bank of India attempts to tighten the screws on errant lenders, a shadow game plays out in state capitals where the true power resides. This dynamic, often described as dual control, has mutated into a sophisticated mechanism of obstruction. Between 2020 and 2026, despite the Banking Regulation Amendment Act intending to empower the central regulator, state governments have actively shielded corrupt boards from scrutiny. The reason is simple and brutal: these banks are the treasuries of local political machines.
The Registrar as a Buffer
The primary instrument of this shielding is the Registrar of Cooperative Societies or RCS. While the RBI can cancel a banking license, the power to supersede a board, appoint a liquidator, or order a recovery audit often lies with the RCS, a state appointed official. This official frequently acts not as a regulator but as a gatekeeper for political interests.
Consider the case of the Karnala Nagari Sahakari Bank in Maharashtra. The bank collapsed under the weight of fraud involving its chairman, a former MLA. While the fraud surfaced around 2020, the restitution process dragged on painfully for depositors. It was only in July 2025 that the Enforcement Directorate could finally restitute assets worth Rs 386 crore to the depositors. For five years, the political ecosystem in Raigad District managed to obfuscate the money trail, allowing funds to be diverted into trusts and sports academies controlled by the accused. The state machinery, rather than facilitating the RBI audit, often delayed the filing of FIRs or diluted the charges in initial police reports.
The Clean Chit Factory
Nothing illustrates this shielding better than the saga of the Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank. Allegations of a Rs 25,000 crore scam involving top political brass from the ruling coalition had surfaced years ago. Yet, the Economic Offences Wing of the Mumbai Police filed a closure report in late 2020 and another in early 2024, claiming no incriminating evidence was found. This stands in stark contrast to the Enforcement Directorate findings which challenged these closure reports. The state police, reporting to the very ministers accused in the scam, became the first line of defense against federal scrutiny.
Stalling the Auditors
In Karnataka, the Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank scandal exposes another tactic: the audit freeze. When the scam broke in 2020 involving the misappropriation of over Rs 1500 crore, the state government promised swift action. However, the forensic audit required to pinpoint the beneficiaries was delayed for years. It was only in 2023 and 2024, after immense pressure from depositor forums, that the investigation gained momentum, eventually leading to ED attachments in 2025. The delay allowed wilful defaulters, many with close ties to the ruling party in Bengaluru, to liquidate assets or move capital beyond reach.
The New Wave of 2026
The trend continues unabated into the current year. In January 2026, the Andhra Pradesh government ordered a probe into the Prakasam District Central Cooperative Bank. Preliminary inquiries revealed that loans were sanctioned at breakneck speed to political affiliates without collateral. The pattern is identical to the scams of the early 2020s. The change in government in Andhra Pradesh exposed the rot, proving that regulatory action in this sector is often vindictive and partisan rather than systemic. One party shields its own banks while exposing those of its rival.
The Cost of Immunity
The Banking Regulation Amendment Act of 2020 was supposed to end this. It gave the RBI powers to supersede boards directly. However, states have found workarounds by delaying the implementation of RBI orders or challenging them in local courts using the RCS as a proxy. The New India Cooperative Bank case in February 2025, where Rs 122 crore was embezzled, saw immediate political mudslinging but slow police action. The losers are the middle class depositors. They stand in queues, their life savings frozen, while the directors who looted them sit in the state assemblies that are supposed to protect the law.
“““html
Section 16. The Demonetization Spike: Investigating Unusual Deposit Patterns in Late 2016
The final months of 2016 witnessed a financial anomaly that forever altered the perception of Indian banking. When high denomination currency notes were declared void overnight, commercial banks scrutinized inflows with rigor. However, the district and urban cooperative banks, often described as the personal fiefdoms of local powerbrokers, told a different story. For years, these institutions operated within a regulatory blind spot. It is only now, through forensic audits and enforcement actions conducted between 2020 and 2026, that we can fully reconstruct the mechanics of that period. The recent crackdown reveals how these banks served as conduits for laundering black money, protected by a nexus of political patronage that is finally unraveling.
The Mechanics of Conversion
Investigations launched by the Income Tax Department in April 2023 provide the clearest window into the methods used during the 2016 spike. While investigating cooperative banks in Karnataka, officials uncovered a systematic “laundromat” operation. The 2023 findings revealed that these banks actively discounted bearer cheques for business entities, routing funds through accounts belonging to fictitious persons. This same mechanism was instrumental in late 2016. By fragmenting large cash hoards into smaller deposits under the threshold of reporting, these banks allowed millions to enter the formal system without alerting the Financial Intelligence Unit. The 2023 probe estimated bogus expenditure bookings in just one cluster of banks to exceed Rs 1,000 crore, confirming that the infrastructure for such massive evasion was robust and well tested.
Political Protection and Consequences
The immunity enjoyed by these banks was not accidental but structural. The boardrooms of these institutions are frequently populated by active politicians who view the bank deposits as a private war chest. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) actions in 2025 against the Karnala Nagari Sahakari Bank illustrate this dynamic perfectly. The ED successfully restituted assets worth Rs 380 crore in a fraud case involving a former MLA. This case highlights the typical pattern: funds siphoned off through loan accounts opened in the names of unaware villagers or fake entities, a method identical to the one used to mask the ownership of demonetized cash in 2016.
Similarly, the investigation into the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank in Kerala, which saw ED attachment of assets worth Rs 57.75 crore in late 2023, exposed how loans were sanctioned in cash to benami applicants. This lack of a digital trail was the primary feature that made cooperative banks attractive destinations for illicit cash in late 2016. The depositors during the demonetization window were often not the actual beneficiaries but mere conduits for the political elite controlling the bank boards.
The Regulatory Cleanup
The Reserve Bank of India has abandoned its earlier soft touch approach. Data from the 2024 to 2025 period shows a distinct shift toward zero tolerance. The central bank canceled seven licenses in a single year and imposed fines totaling over Rs 15 crore on cooperative lenders. These penalties cited specific failures in monitoring suspicious transactions, a clear legacy issue from the demonetization era. The sheer volume of these penalties suggests that the regulator is no longer willing to accept the “local sentiment” argument that politicians often use to deflect scrutiny.
The discovery of 21,000 fake accounts in the PMC Bank scandal, which unraveled fully between 2019 and 2022, served as the ultimate proof of concept. It demonstrated that a cooperative bank could maintain a parallel accounting book for years. This capability explains how the 2016 deposit spike was absorbed without immediate collapse. The money was not just deposited; it was layered and integrated into the system through a maze of ghost accounts that auditors are only now identifying.
Conclusion
The unusual deposit patterns of late 2016 were not a glitch but a feature of a compromised banking tier. The aggressive enforcement actions from 2020 through 2026 have validated the theory that cooperative banks functioned as the piggy banks for the political class. With the Enforcement Directorate now attaching assets and the RBI canceling licenses at a record pace, the impunity that characterized the 2016 spike is finally meeting its end. The cost, however, has been paid by the genuine small depositors who found their savings trapped in the crossfire of this necessary purification.
“`
17. Victim Profiles: The Devastating Impact on Pensioners and Small Depositors
The ledger entries of cooperative bank failures are often written in red ink, but the true cost is measured in the grey lives of pensioners who trusted these institutions with their sunset years. Between 2020 and 2026, a disturbing pattern emerged across India where local political ambition collided with banking regulations, leaving small depositors as collateral damage.
The Karuvannur Tragedy
The human toll of this financial malfeasance is starkly illustrated by the collapse of the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank in Kerala. Once touted as a model of community banking, it became a symbol of betrayal for thousands.
Consider the case of Philomina Devassy, a 70 year old retired nurse. In July 2022, as she lay fighting for her life in a Thrissur hospital, her husband pleaded with the bank to release a fraction of their 30 lakh rupees fixed deposit for her urgent medical treatment. The bank, citing a liquidity crunch driven by fraudulent loans to politically connected individuals, refused. Philomina died without receiving her own money. Her body was later brought to the bank premises in a heart wrenching protest that shook the conscience of the state.
Similarly, in late 2023, Sasi Kolangad, a differently abled man who had deposited the proceeds from his family property sale into the same bank, suffered a brain hemorrhage. Despite desperate requests for funds for emergency surgery, the bank released only a nominal amount. Sasi passed away in September 2023, another victim of a system where liquidity had been drained by “benami” loans.
The Bengaluru Crisis
The narrative remains consistent across state lines. In Bengaluru, the Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank debacle left over 15,000 depositors in financial limbo. Data from 2024 reveals that while the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) settled claims up to the insured limit of 5 lakh rupees, a significant demographic of retirees held deposits far exceeding this cap.
- Total Losses Estimated: 1,944 crore rupees in the Guru Raghavendra case alone.
- Victim Mortality: Advocacy groups report over 60 elderly depositors died between 2020 and 2025 while waiting for full refunds, many due to an inability to afford medical care.
- Interest Waiver: Desperate depositors offered to forgo 650 crore rupees in accumulated interest just to recover their principal amounts.
For these victims, the cooperative bank was not merely a financial institution but a neighborly extension of trust. They were lured by interest rates slightly higher than commercial banks and the assurance of local leaders who sat on the boards. The betrayal, therefore, was personal.
The Illusion of Insurance
While the central government raised the deposit insurance cover to 5 lakh rupees in 2020, this safety net proved insufficient for the middle class pensioner. For a retired couple living off interest income, a combined lifetime savings of 20 or 30 lakh rupees forms their only social security. When a cooperative bank freezes operations under RBI directions, the immediate release of 5 lakh rupees provides only temporary relief. The remaining corpus often remains trapped in liquidation processes that drag on for a decade.
In January 2024, Joshi, a bedridden depositor of the Karuvannur bank, wrote a harrowing letter to the Kerala High Court seeking permission for mercy killing. With 72 lakh rupees stuck in the frozen bank and no funds for his treatment or his children’s education, he argued that death was preferable to the indignity of absolute penury.
A Continuing Cycle
The rot continues to spread. In February 2025, the Mumbai police exposed a fresh scam at the New India Cooperative Bank, involving a 122 crore rupees fraud perpetrated between 2020 and 2025. Once again, the script was identical: cash siphoned off from vaults, falsified records, and a board of directors asleep at the wheel. The immediate victims were, as always, the small traders and senior citizens who found their withdrawal limits capped overnight.
These profiles reveal a systemic failure where cooperative banks function less as financial guardians and more as private treasuries for the local elite. For the victims, the loss is total. They lose not just their money, but their dignity, their health, and in tragic instances, their lives.
Section 18. Legal Loopholes: Exploiting the Cooperative Societies Act to Evade Banking Regulations
The duality of control has long been the original sin of Indian cooperative banking. While the Banking Regulation Amendment Act of 2020 promised to close the escape routes used by politically connected boards, the years from 2020 to 2026 reveal a different reality. Local power brokers have simply adapted, finding new fissures in the legal framework to maintain these institutions as personal piggy banks. The conflict between the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Registrar of Cooperative Societies (RCS) remains the primary theater of this financial guerilla war.
The Dual Control Deadlock
The core legal loophole lies in the jurisdictional gray zone. The RBI regulates banking functions, but the RCS, a state government entity, controls management, elections, and audits. This split allows directors to hide behind the Cooperative Societies Act when the central bank demands accountability. Between 2020 and 2026, this friction caused a regulatory paralysis in states like Maharashtra and Kerala.
Despite the 2020 amendment empowering the RBI to supersede boards, the execution is frequently stalled by legal challenges mounted under state cooperative laws. For instance, when the RBI moved to impose restrictions on the Shirpur Merchants Cooperative Bank in April 2024 due to a deteriorating financial position, the local political machinery attempted to frame the regulatory action as an attack on federalism. The restrictions, which included caps on withdrawals, had to be extended well into 2025 because the underlying capital erosion was deeper than initial state audits revealed.
The Nominal Member Ruse
A favorite method to bypass lending caps is the “nominal member” loophole. Regulations restrict loans to non members, but politicians circumvent this by enrolling cronies as nominal members for a trivial fee. This allows the board to funnel depositors’ money to associates who would never qualify for credit at a commercial bank.
The Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank scam in Kerala, which dominated headlines in 2024, is a textbook example. Investigators found that loans worth crores were sanctioned to individuals who were mere paper members, often without adequate collateral. These borrowers were proxies for local party leaders. The legal cover? The board claimed they were technically lending to “members” as per the Cooperative Societies Act, effectively nullifying the prudential norms set by the RBI regarding exposure limits.
Audit Arbitration and Delay Tactics
State appointed auditors are often the first line of defense for corrupt boards. Unlike the rigorous statutory audits of commercial banks, cooperative audits are frequently delayed or diluted. In 2023, the RBI cancelled the licenses of several urban cooperative banks, including the Sri Sharada Mahila Co-operative Bank. The common thread was a discrepancy between the asset quality reported by state auditors and the reality found by RBI inspectors.
By the time the central regulator steps in, the assets have often vanished. In the case of the Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank, the scam exploded into public view only after years of window dressing. Even as the CBI took over the probe in 2023, the legal defense mounted by the accused relied on procedural delays inherent in the state cooperative laws, arguing that the RBI had overstepped its jurisdiction during the transition period of the 2020 Act.
The License Cancellation Spree
The years 2024 and 2025 saw the RBI aggressively closing these loopholes by simply shutting down the violators. In 2024 alone, the central bank cancelled the licenses of seven cooperative banks by July. These included the City Cooperative Bank in Mumbai and the Purvanchal Cooperative Bank in Uttar Pradesh. The official reason cited was always “inadequate capital,” but the subtext was almost always governance failure.
The political response has been to delay the appointment of liquidators. Under the law, while the RBI cancels the license, the Registrar must appoint the liquidator. This step is often dragged out to allow favored borrowers time to settle their accounts off the books or to destroy incriminating evidence. The Angamaly Urban Cooperative Society case in late 2024 highlighted this, where the administrative committee was dissolved only after loans were found issued under fake names, yet the recovery process faced immediate political hurdles.
Conclusion
The period from 2020 to 2026 proves that legislation alone cannot fix a culture of extraction. As long as the Cooperative Societies Act allows local politicians to act as gatekeepers for management and audits, the RBI will remain a firefighter arriving after the house is already in ashes. The legal loopholes are not accidental; they are preserved to ensure that cooperative banks remain the private treasuries of the public elite.
19. Anatomy of a Collapse: A Case Study of a Failed Politically Linked Bank
The disintegration of the Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank in Thrissur, Kerala, serves as the definitive autopsy of how local credit institutions morph into private treasuries for political masters. once hailed as a model of rural banking success, the century old institution imploded in 2021, trapping over ₹300 crore of depositor wealth and exposing a sinister nexus between elected officials and banking operations. This case study details the precise mechanics used to siphon public money between 2020 and 2026, revealing a systemic rot that extends far beyond a single branch.
The Shadow Boardroom
While a formal board of directors existed on paper, the real power lay elsewhere. Investigations by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) revealed that a clandestine “political sub committee” of the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist) allegedly dictated loan sanctions. This shadow body bypassed banking regulations, instructing compliant officials to release funds to favored cadres and real estate proxies. Between 2010 and 2021, the bank functioned less as a lender and more as a party slush fund, but the consequences fully matured during the 2020 to 2023 period when liquidity dried up.
The Numbers of Betrayal (2021–2025 Data)
- Total Scam Estimate: ₹300 crore (approximate)
- Funds Owed to Depositors (2025): Over ₹260 crore remains unpaid
- Assets Attached by ED: ₹128 crore worth of land and deposits
- Benami Loans Identified: 50+ major accounts holding majority of bad debt
The Mechanism of Extraction
The looting followed a distinct three step protocol. First, the Benami Loan method was deployed. Loans were sanctioned in the names of unsuspecting members who had never applied for them. The money, however, was credited to the accounts of political proxies. In one egregious instance documented in 2023, a single property deed was pledged to secure multiple loans for different individuals, inflating the collateral value by 500 percent.
Second, the bank utilized Software Manipulation. The core banking software was tweaked to hide overdue status, allowing the board to report healthy balance sheets while the actual cash reserves were empty. This digital camouflage prevented early detection by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies until the deficit became too massive to hide.
Third, the Party Tax diversion. Investigators found evidence suggesting that commissions from these illegal loans were funneled into party coffers for election expenses and land acquisition. In 2024, the ED took the unprecedented step of naming the political party itself as an accused entity under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, freezing party accounts in the district.
The Human Cost and 2025 Status
The collapse was not merely financial but humanitarian. The tragedy peaked when elderly depositors, denied access to their life savings for emergency medical care, reportedly died due to lack of treatment. This sparked statewide protests in 2022 and 2023, forcing the state government to announce a revival package.
As of early 2026, the resolution remains stagnant. Despite the seizure of assets worth nearly ₹128 crore, legal battles have stalled the liquidation process. The bank currently operates under strict restrictions, allowing only nominal withdrawals. The Karuvannur saga illustrates that when cooperative banks lose their autonomy to political interference, the inevitable outcome is not just a failed bank but a broken social contract.
“`html
Cooperative Banks: The Piggy Banks of Local Politicians
20. The Path to Reform: The Impact of Recent Banking Regulation Amendments and RBI Oversight
For decades, the Indian cooperative banking sector operated as a parallel financial universe. It was a world where local heavyweights and political barons treated depositor funds as their private treasuries. These entities, often termed the “piggy banks” of local politicians, thrived under a system of dual control that allowed them to escape rigorous scrutiny. However, the catastrophic collapse of the Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) Bank in 2019 marked a turning point. It shattered the illusion of safety and forced a legislative overhaul that is now, between 2020 and 2026, fundamentally reshaping the landscape.
The defining moment for this reform was the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020. Before this legislation, the Registrar of Cooperative Societies (RCS), typically a state government appointee, held significant sway over these banks. This arrangement often shielded politically connected boards from federal oversight. The 2020 Act effectively shifted the power of regulation, including the authority over management, capital, audit, and liquidation, directly to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The results have been swift and, for many errant banks, fatal.
The Purge: By the Numbers (2023 to 2025)
The central bank has utilized its new powers with unprecedented aggression. Data reveals a systematic cleanup of the sector:
- In 2024 alone, the RBI cancelled the licenses of 10 Urban Cooperative Banks across states like Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Karnataka.
- Prominent casualties included the City Cooperative Bank in Mumbai and the Purvanchal Cooperative Bank in Ghazipur.
- In the fiscal year ending March 2025, the RBI imposed a staggering 264 penalties on cooperative banks, totaling nearly 15.63 crore rupees. This accounted for the vast majority of all enforcement actions taken by the regulator that year.
The crackdown has not been limited to closures. The regulator has actively targeted governance failures. In July 2024, the RBI imposed a massive penalty of almost 6 crore rupees on the Mehsana Urban Cooperative Bank for issues related to director related loans. This strikes at the heart of the “piggy bank” culture, where directors previously sanctioned loans to their own ventures or political affiliates with impunity. The message is clear: the days of using public deposits to fund political campaigns or personal businesses are numbered.
However, the transition is not without resistance. The political nexus runs deep, and recent investigations show that the rot persists in pockets. A glaring example emerged in January 2026 involving the Prakasam District Central Cooperative Bank. Investigations revealed that during the previous regime, loans worth nearly 300 crore rupees were granted without proper procedure, often to individuals with strong political connections. These “loans” were effectively gifts, with no intention of repayment, leaving the bank drowning in bad debt by the time the new administration took charge. This case serves as a stark reminder that while the RBI has the tools, the political will to subvert the system remains strong in local fiefdoms.
To counter this, the RBI has introduced the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework, which became fully effective for Urban Cooperative Banks on April 1, 2025. This mechanism allows the regulator to intervene early when a bank shows signs of stress, restricting its ability to lend or expand until its financial health is restored. It replaces subjective oversight with objective, data driven triggers based on asset quality and capital ratios.
The sector is also undergoing a forced consolidation. From over 1,900 entities in 2004, the number of Urban Cooperative Banks had fallen to 1,457 by the end of fiscal year 2025. Weak banks are being told to merge or perish. The merger of the scandal hit PMC Bank with Unity Small Finance Bank in 2022 set the precedent, and smaller, weaker entities are now following suit to survive the regulatory heat.
As we move through 2026, the era of the “politician’s piggy bank” is slowly yielding to a new reality of professional banking. The creation of the National Urban Cooperative Finance and Development Corporation serves as a new umbrella organization to professionalize the sector further. While the cleanup is messy and the political pushback is fierce, the data from 2020 to 2026 confirms that the Indian cooperative banking sector is being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the realm of accountability.
“`Here is an HTML list of 10 real news references and analytical articles that document the phenomenon of cooperative banks being used for political purposes, mismanagement, and financial scams (primarily focusing on India, where this issue is most prevalent and documented).
“`html
Cooperative Banks: The “Piggy Banks” of Local Politicians
The following references document instances of political interference, scams, and regulatory crackdowns regarding Cooperative Banks.
-
The Karuvannur Service Co-operative Bank Scam: A massive loan scam in Kerala involving local political leaders, where loans were sanctioned on mortgaged properties without the knowledge of the owners.
Reference: ED attaches assets worth ₹29 crore in Karuvannur Service Co-operative Bank fraud case – The Hindu (2023) -
Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank (MSC) Scam: The Enforcement Directorate investigated allegations that loans were fraudulently given to sugar factories owned by politician’s relatives.
Reference: MSC Bank scam: ED attaches assets of firm linked to Ajit Pawar – The Economic Times (2021) -
The Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Crisis: An investigation into the misappropriation of funds in Karnataka, highlighting how regulatory loopholes were exploited by management with political clout.
Reference: Guru Raghavendra Bank scam: ED attaches assets worth Rs 45.32 crore – Deccan Herald (2022) -
RBI’s Regulatory Crackdown: An analysis of why the Reserve Bank of India had to step in to curb the dominance of politicians in the Urban Cooperative Bank (UCB) sector.
Reference: RBI tightens norms for appointment of directors in urban co-operative banks – LiveMint (2021) -
The PMC Bank Collapse: While largely driven by corporate fraud (HDIL), the case exposed the lack of oversight typical in cooperative banks run by politically connected boards.
Reference: PMC Bank scam explained: What happened and why RBI has clamped down – India Today (2019) -
Mumbai District Central Co-operative Bank: Controversy surrounding the eligibility of political leaders to serve on the board of cooperative banks under the guise of being “labourers.”
Reference: Mumbai Police file chargesheet against BJP leader Pravin Darekar in bank fraud case – Hindustan Times (2023) -
Adarsh Credit Cooperative Society: One of the largest Ponzi schemes disguised as a cooperative society, allegedly used to funnel money for political and personal gain.
Reference: SOG arrests founder of Adarsh Credit Co-operative Society for alleged diversion of funds – Times of India (2018) -
The “Dual Control” Problem: An editorial piece explaining how the dual control of State Registrars (politicians) and the RBI created the environment for these banks to become personal treasuries.
Reference: Cooperative Banks Bill: Ending the dual control problem – Financial Express (2020) -
Rupee Co-operative Bank License Cancellation: The RBI cancelled the license of this Pune-based bank after years of financial instability caused by bad loans to politically connected entities.
Reference: RBI cancels licence of Pune-based Rupee Co-operative Bank – Business Standard (2022) -
Systemic Rot in Cooperatives: A report on the RBI cancelling licenses of multiple cooperative banks in a single year due to lack of capital and earning prospects, often linked to mismanagement.
Reference: RBI cancels licences of two cooperative banks; 90% depositors to get full amount – CNBC TV18 (2024)
“`
