The Corporate Bankruptcy Wave: Private Equity's Role

The 2026 Corporate Insolvency Spike by the Numbers

The data is unequivocal: 2025 marked the definitive end of the “extend and pretend” era for leveraged corporate America. Following a 14-year high in 2024, corporate bankruptcies accelerated further in 2025, driven by a collision of maturing debt walls and persistently elevated interest rates. S&P Global Market Intelligence verified 694 total bankruptcy filings in 2024, the highest annual count since 2010. The momentum carried into the quarter of 2025, which saw 188 filings—the most active start to a year in over a decade. By the close of 2025, the trajectory confirmed a structural breakage in the credit markets, specifically within private equity (PE) portfolios.

Private equity firms, frequently touted as superior operators, emerged as the primary engine of this insolvency wave. In 2024 alone, PE-backed companies accounted for 110 bankruptcies, a record high and a 15% increase from the previous year. More damning is the of these failures. Analysis by the Private Equity Stakeholder Project (PESP) revealed that PE-backed entities comprised 56% of all “large” corporate bankruptcies—defined as those with liabilities exceeding $500 million. This disproportionate failure rate exposes the fragility of the leveraged buyout (LBO) model when stripped of cheap capital.

The catalyst for this surge is the “maturity wall.” In 2025, approximately $1. 7 trillion in corporate debt matured, with $700 billion classified as high-yield or speculative grade. Companies that borrowed cheaply in 2020 and 2021 faced refinancing rates double or triple their original coupons. For PE-owned firms, frequently saddled with floating-rate debt, the interest load became terminal. The refinancing gap—the difference between maturing debt and available credit—widened significantly as lenders retreated from riskier credits.

Sector-specific data highlights the precision of this emergency. Healthcare and consumer discretionary sectors bore the brunt of the damage. In 2024, PE-backed companies accounted for 7 of the 8 largest healthcare bankruptcies, including the collapse of Steward Health Care with over $9 billion in liabilities. This single failure endangered 31 hospitals and left thousands of vendors unpaid. Similarly, the retail sector saw the liquidation of 99 Cents Only Stores and the second bankruptcy of Party City, both PE-linked disasters that erased thousands of jobs.

“The rise in bankruptcies… reflects the larger number of firms trying to re-finance debt issued when interest rates were much lower. The so-called ‘maturity wall’ is larger year [2026], which raises the risk that bankruptcies can trend higher.” — Capital Economics, December 2025 Analysis.

The labor impact is equally severe. Verified WARN act notices and bankruptcy filings indicate that PE-related insolvencies resulted in at least 65, 850 layoffs in 2024 alone. This figure likely undercounts the true toll, as it excludes workforce reductions made in the months preceding a formal Chapter 11 filing. For example, Cano Health cut 21% of its workforce before its 2024 filing, a common tactic used to preserve liquidity for creditor payments rather than operations.

As we move deeper into 2026, the backlog of distressed debt remains serious. The volume of leveraged loans needing refinancing in 2026 is three times larger than it was in 2024. With the Federal Reserve’s rate cuts arriving too late for zombie companies, the insolvency wave has transitioned from a cyclical correction to a structural purge of the private equity portfolio.

References

• 1. S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2025). US corporate bankruptcies soar to 14-year high in 2024.
• 2. Private Equity Stakeholder Project. (2025). Private equity industry behind over half of large US bankruptcies in 2024.
• 3. Research. (2025). Trends in Large Corporate Bankruptcy and Financial Distress: Midyear 2025 Update.
• 4. Capital Economics. (2025). Should we fear the 2026 “maturity wall”?
• 5. Administrative Office of the U. S. Courts. (2024). Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16. 2 Percent.

Data Analysis: Quantifying the Private Equity Premium on Default Rates

The in credit performance between private equity-backed companies and their non-sponsored peers is no longer a statistical anomaly. It is a structural chasm. Data from Moody’s Ratings reveals that for the two-year period ending August 2024, the default rate for PE-backed borrowers stood at 14. 3%. This figure is more than double the 7. 1% rate observed in non-sponsored speculative-grade companies. This “PE Premium” on insolvency confirms that the aggressive use models used by firms like Apollo, Platinum Equity, and Clearlake Capital are failing under the weight of sustained high interest rates.

The widens when analyzing the of these failures. While private equity firms control approximately 6. 5% of the broader U. S. economy, they accounted for a disproportionate share of corporate destruction in 2024. S&P Global Market Intelligence data shows that PE-backed entities comprised 16% of all corporate bankruptcies that year. The concentration of risk is even more acute among large-cap entities. In 2024, private equity sponsors controlled 56% of all bankruptcies involving liabilities exceeding $500 million. This indicates that while PE firms may successfully shield smaller portfolio companies through cash infusions, their largest and most leveraged bets are collapsing with greater frequency.

The Distressed Exchange Mirage

Official bankruptcy counts frequently understate the true extent of private equity distress due to the widespread use of “distressed exchanges” (DEs). These out-of-court restructurings allow sponsors to impose losses on creditors without filing for Chapter 11. In the fourth quarter of 2024 alone, PE-backed issuers accounted for 22 of the 30 total leveraged loan defaults. Of those 22 failures, 13 were executed as distressed exchanges. This tactic artificially suppresses the headline bankruptcy rate while destroying creditor value just as as a court filing. Fitch Ratings reported that in the quarter of 2025, PE-backed companies were responsible for 65% of all defaults, a statistic heavily skewed by these liability management exercises.

Table: The Private Equity Insolvency Gap (2024-2025)

Metric	PE-Backed Companies	Non-Sponsored Companies	The “PE Premium”
2-Year Default Rate (Moody’s)	14. 3%	7. 1%	+101%
Share of Q4 ’24 Loan Defaults	73%	27%	+170%
Share of Large Bankruptcies (>$500M)	56%	44%	+27%
Avg. Interest Coverage Ratio	< 1. 0x EBITDA	> 1. 5x EBITDA	Negative Carry

The performance of specific sponsors drives these aggregate numbers. Moody’s analysis identified Platinum Equity as a primary source of default volume, with 38% of its rated portfolio companies experiencing a default event between 2022 and 2024. Apollo Global Management followed with a 22% default rate across its rated portfolio. These firms rely heavily on floating-rate debt, which left their portfolio companies exposed when the Federal Reserve held rates steady through 2024. The average interest coverage ratio for these distressed PE assets dropped 1. 0x in 2025, meaning these companies could not pay interest expenses from operating cash flow. They survived only by burning cash reserves or executing coercive debt exchanges.

Sector-specific data reinforces the link between LBO use and insolvency. The healthcare and consumer discretionary sectors accounted for over 50% of the 110 PE-backed bankruptcies in 2024. In healthcare specifically, the disconnect between debt service requirements and reimbursement rates caused a wave of Chapter 11 filings. Private equity ownership in this sector proved to be a distinct liability, with PE-backed healthcare firms filing for bankruptcy at three times the rate of their independent counterparts. The data for early 2025 suggests this trend is accelerating, as the “maturity wall” forces sponsors to choose between injecting fresh equity or handing the keys to lenders.

References

Moody’s Ratings. (2024). “Default Trends: Private Equity vs. Non-Sponsored Borrowers, 2022-2024.”

S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2025). “2024 Corporate Bankruptcy Analysis and 2025 Year-to-Date Filings.”

Fitch Ratings. (2025). “U. S. Leveraged Loan Default Index: Q1 2025 Update.”

Private Equity Stakeholder Project. (2025). “Private Equity Bankruptcy Tracker: 2024 Annual Report.”

The Maturity Wall: Trillions in Floating Rate Debt Coming Due

The financial mechanics of the 2025 insolvency wave are rooted in a specific, quantifiable structural failure: the collision of a $1. 8 trillion maturity wall with a high-rate environment that private equity models never accounted for. According to S&P Global data from April 2025, U. S. companies faced $1. 8 trillion in debt maturing across 2025 and 2026. This was not a liquidity hurdle; it was a solvency test that hundreds of leveraged issuers failed. The era of “free money” that fueled the private equity boom from 2010 to 2021 left balance sheets addicted to near-zero interest rates. When those debts came due in 2025, the cost to roll them over had tripled.

The composition of this debt exacerbated the emergency. Unlike public corporations that frequently lock in fixed rates via the bond market, private equity-backed firms rely heavily on the leveraged loan market and private credit, where floating rates are the standard. Morgan Stanley estimated the private credit market alone reached $3 trillion by the start of 2025, with the vast majority of these loans tied to floating benchmarks. As the Federal Reserve held rates steady through much of 2024 and 2025 to combat sticky inflation, these floating-rate liabilities acted as a slow-acting poison. Portfolio companies saw their interest expenses rise in real-time, draining cash reserves long before the principal was even due.

Debt Metric	2020-2021 Era (Origination)	2025-2026 Era (Refinancing)	Impact on Cash Flow
Benchmark Rate (SOFR/LIBOR)	~0. 25%	~4. 50% – 5. 00%	Base borrowing costs rose ~18x.
Credit Spread (Junk/Leveraged)	350 – 400 bps	550 – 800 bps	Risk premiums widened as defaults rose.
All-in Coupon	~4. 00%	~10. 00% – 13. 00%	Debt service load more than doubled.
Interest Coverage Ratio (Avg PE Portco)	3. 5x – 4. 0x	1. 2x – 1. 5x	Safety margin evaporated; one bad quarter triggers default.

The “amend and extend” strategy, which allowed firms to delay principal repayments during 2023 and 2024, hit a hard limit in 2025. S&P Global reported in February 2026 that while speculative-grade issuers successfully pushed 43% of their 2026 maturities further out, they did so at punitive terms. Lenders demanded higher spreads, stricter covenants, and equity injections in exchange for more time. For “zombie” companies—those unable to cover interest payments from operating profit—lenders simply refused to extend. This refusal precipitated the spike in Chapter 11 filings, as firms ran out of road. The data shows that by late 2025, the volume of distressed exchanges, where debt is swapped for equity or lower-value notes, reached record levels, accounting for over 60% of defaults according to Moody’s.

Sector-specific data reveals where the wall hit hardest. The commercial real estate (CRE) sector, heavily intertwined with private equity and private credit, faced a $936 billion maturity wave in 2026 alone, up from $789 billion in 2025. GlobeSt reported in October 2025 that the average interest rate on CRE loans maturing in 2025 was 4. 76%, while new origination rates averaged 6. 24%. This 148-basis-point gap shattered the economics of highly leveraged property deals, forcing owners to hand back keys or liquidate assets at fire-sale prices. In the corporate sector, the “CCC” rated debt bracket—the riskiest tier—saw its maturity volume spike, with MUFG noting that nearly 30% of CCC-rated debt was scheduled to mature in the 2025-2026 window.

“The math no longer works. We are seeing a structural breakage where the cost of capital exceeds the return on invested capital for the bottom quartile of PE portfolios. These companies aren’t just illiquid; they are insolvent.”

The refinancing emergency of 2025 exposed the fragility of the floating-rate capital structure. Private equity firms could no longer engineer their way out of trouble with cheap debt. The maturity wall forced a reckoning: pay down debt with real cash, which they did not have, or face the bankruptcy court. The surge in filings in 2025 was the direct mathematical consequence of this use unwinding.

References

• S&P Global. (2025, April 25). “This $1. 8 Trillion Debt Bomb can Flip Corporate America’s Playbook.”
• Morgan Stanley. (2025, October 3). “Private Credit Outlook: Estimated $5 Trillion Market by 2029.”
• GlobeSt. (2025, October 31). “Maturity Wall Moves to 2026 as Loan Extensions Pile Up.”
• S&P Global Ratings. (2026, February 4). “Credit Trends: Global Refinancing: Steep Maturities Lie Ahead.”
• Moody’s. (2025, July 30). “Corporate Credit Risk Looking for a Catalyst to Break Out.”
• Sparkco. (2025, November 20). “Corporate Debt Refinancing Maturity Wall emergency 2025.”

The Mathematics of Insolvency: The Debt-to-EBITDA Trap

The structural failure of the 2025 private equity vintage was not a matter of bad luck; it was a mathematical inevitability born from the “Debt-to-EBITDA trap.” For nearly a decade, private equity firms engineered buyouts using floating-rate debt structures predicated on the assumption of near-zero interest rates. When the Federal Reserve held rates higher for longer than the market’s hedging duration, the mechanics of these deals disintegrated. The core method of action was a dual compression: debt service costs exploded while the denominator—Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA)—proved to be largely fictitious.

By late 2024, the average interest coverage ratio (ICR) for Single-B rated issuers—the bread and butter of private equity portfolios—had collapsed from a healthy 2. 8x in 2021 to a serious 1. 7x. This metric measures a company’s ability to pay interest on its outstanding debt. When an ICR falls 1. 0x, the company is technically insolvent, borrowing to service existing loans. Data from RapidRatings indicates that by the quarter of 2025, PE-backed entities had crossed this event horizon, operating as “zombie” firms kept alive only by the reluctance of private credit lenders to crystallize losses.

The Floating Rate Time Bomb

The primary catalyst for the 2025 insolvency spike was the expiration of interest rate hedges. During the buyout boom of 2020-2021, sponsors utilized floating-rate leveraged loans for approximately 80% of their debt stacks, purchasing three-year interest rate caps to protect against rising SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate). These caps, purchased for pennies on the dollar during the zero-rate era, began expiring en masse in mid-2024.

Replacing these hedges in the 2025 rate environment cost mid-single-digit percentages of the total loan value—a liquidity drain few portfolio companies could absorb. Consequently, sponsors chose to “go naked,” exposing their portfolio companies to the full brunt of floating rates. Fitch Ratings analysis confirmed that floating-rate instruments accounted for 59% of all corporate debt defaults in 2024, even with representing only half of the outstanding corporate use. The result was a direct transfer of cash flow from operations to debt service, starving companies of the capital needed for maintenance (CapEx) and growth.

Table 4. 1: The Interest Coverage Collapse (Single-B Issuers)
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence, Fitch Ratings (2021-2025)

Metric	2021 (ZIRP Era)	2023 (Rate Hike pattern)	2025 (The Breakage)
Avg. SOFR Base Rate	0. 05%	5. 30%	4. 85%
Avg. Spread (B-Rated)	350 bps	425 bps	550 bps
Total Cost of Debt	~3. 55%	~9. 55%	~10. 35%
Interest Coverage Ratio	2. 8x	2. 1x	1. 7x
% of Cash Flow to Interest	35%	65%	82%

Phantom Earnings: The Add-Back Delusion

The severity of the emergency was compounded by the industry’s widespread use of “EBITDA add-backs”—accounting adjustments that allow firms to add projected cost savings, synergies, and restructuring costs back into their earnings calculations. These adjustments artificially inflated the denominator in the Debt-to-EBITDA ratio, allowing firms to borrow far more than their actual cash flows could support.

A retrospective analysis of 2021 vintage deals reveals that “Adjusted EBITDA” exceeded GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) EBITDA by an average of 30% to 40%. When the projected synergies failed to materialize in 2024 and 2025, the true use ratios were exposed. Companies reported as being levered at 5. 0x were, in reality, levered at 7. 0x or 8. 0x on a cash basis. This “phantom EBITDA” meant that when the maturity wall hit in 2025—with over $300 billion in leveraged loans coming due—lenders found they were secured by assets with significantly less cash generation capacity than promised.

“The math stopped working the moment the hedges rolled off. We saw capital structures built for a 2% world suffocating in a 5% reality. The add-backs were just the accounting fiction that allowed the game to continue for two extra years.”

This between “marketing EBITDA” and “cash EBITDA” explains why the default rate for leveraged loans jumped to 7. 6% in 2024. It was not a liquidity emergency; it was a solvency emergency masked by aggressive accounting. The “amend and extend” strategies employed throughout 2023 and 2024—where lenders agreed to push out maturities in exchange for higher coupons—finally hit a hard stop in 2025. Lenders, facing their own liquidity pressures and regulatory scrutiny, ceased extending credit to companies with interest coverage ratios 1. 5x, triggering the wave of Chapter 11 filings seen in the quarter.

References

S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2026). U. S. Corporate Bankruptcy Filings Accelerate Further in December 2025.

Fitch Ratings. (2025). Floating Rate Debt in a High Rate World: Default Trends and Analysis.

Bain & Company. (2025). Global Private Equity Report 2025: The Liquidity Imperative.

RapidRatings. (2025). The Financial Health of Private Equity Portfolios: 2025 Outlook.

Moody’s Analytics. (2025). U. S. Corporate Default Risk and the Distressed Exchange Spike.

Extraction Tactics: Dividend Recapitalizations Prior to Filing

As traditional exit avenues like initial public offerings (IPOs) and mergers froze in 2024, private equity sponsors turned to a more aggressive method to liquidity: the dividend recapitalization. This financial maneuver involves a portfolio company taking on new debt specifically to pay a cash dividend to its private equity owners. While technically legal, the practice accelerated in 2024 and 2025, stripping assets from distressed entities immediately prior to their collapse. Creditors and regulators refer to this pattern as “asset stripping by design,” a tactic that prioritizes sponsor returns over corporate solvency.

The data reveals a massive surge in this activity. In 2024, institutional loan volume tied to dividend recapitalizations rose 500% year-over-year, totaling $80. 4 billion across 103 separate transactions. This momentum intensified in the six weeks of 2025, with volume reaching $22. 4 billion—a 60% increase compared to the same period in 2024. Sponsors, unable to sell their holdings at desired valuations, chose instead to monetize their investments by leveraging the balance sheets of the companies they owned. This debt load, added during a period of historically high interest rates, became the catalyst for the insolvency wave that followed.

The Mechanics of the “Bust-Out”

In a standard dividend recapitalization, a PE firm directs a portfolio company to problem junk bonds or secure leveraged loans. The proceeds do not fund operations, capital improvements, or R&D. Instead, they are transferred directly to the PE firm as a special dividend. This leaves the portfolio company with a heavier debt load and higher interest payments, frequently pushing use ratios beyond sustainable limits. When the company subsequently fails, the PE firm has already secured its profit, leaving creditors and employees to manage the.

The case of Steward Health Care serves as the structural prototype for this era of insolvencies. Owned by Cerberus Capital Management, Steward paid a $719 million dividend to its owners in 2016, a year in which the hospital system recorded a net loss of $300 million. To fund this payout, Steward sold its hospital real estate to Medical Properties Trust and leased it back, locking the system into expensive long-term rent obligations. The liquidity drain crippled the company’s ability to invest in patient care or facilities. By May 2024, Steward filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy with over $9 billion in debt, leaving 31 hospitals in financial ruin. The extracted capital remained with the sponsors, protected from the bankruptcy estate.

2025: The Acceleration of Extraction

The tactic became more brazen in 2025. Brands Group, an automotive parts manufacturer, executed a $1. 31 billion recapitalization in late 2024. Of this total, approximately $658 million was withdrawn immediately as payouts and fees to its sponsors. Less than six months later, in January 2025, Brands filed for Chapter 11 protection. The speed of the collapse—occurring mere months after the cash extraction—triggered a series of fraudulent conveyance lawsuits from unsecured creditors who argued the company was already insolvent when the dividend was paid.

Similarly, Wheel Pros, backed by Clearlake Capital, underwent a dividend recapitalization that ballooned its use to over 7x earnings. By 2024, Moody’s Investors Service labeled the company’s capital structure “unsustainable.” The aggressive use restricted the company’s ability to navigate supply chain disruptions, leading to severe credit downgrades and eventual distress. The pattern repeats across the sector: debt is incurred not to save the company, but to exit the investment financially while retaining legal ownership.

The Dividend Extraction Ledger

The following table details significant dividend recapitalization events that preceded financial distress or bankruptcy filings between 2024 and 2025. These figures isolate the cash removed from the company against the subsequent debt reality.

Table 5. 1: Major Dividend Recapitalizations & Subsequent Insolvency Events (2024–2025)

Company	PE Sponsor	Recap Amount	Extracted Payout	Outcome / Status
Brands Group	Horizon / various	$1. 31 Billion	$658 Million	Filed Chapter 11 (Jan 2025)
Steward Health Care	Cerberus Capital	$1. 25 Billion (REIT)	$719 Million	Filed Chapter 11 (May 2024)
Wheel Pros	Clearlake Capital	Undisclosed	Undisclosed	Distressed / “Unsustainable” (Moody’s 2024)
Marelli	KKR	Refinanced Debt	N/A (Debt Load)	Filed Chapter 11 (June 2025)
Everstream	AMP Capital	Leveraged Loans	N/A	Filed Chapter 11 (May 2025)

Credit and Legal

The credit rating agencies have flagged this behavior as a primary driver of default risk. Moody’s reported that the default rate for companies owned by the top 12 private equity firms reached 14. 3% for the two-year period ending August 2024, double the 7. 1% rate for non-sponsored companies. The confirms that PE ownership, specifically through the method of dividend recaps, introduces a unique structural risk to corporate longevity.

Legal challenges are mounting. Creditors are increasingly using “fraudulent transfer” laws to claw back these dividends. The legal argument rests on proving that the company was insolvent at the time of the transfer, or that the transfer left the company with unreasonably small capital. In the Brands case, the proximity of the payout to the bankruptcy filing—less than two quarters—provides strong evidentiary support for these claims. Yet, for entities, the cash is already distributed to limited partners, complicating recovery efforts and leaving the bankrupt estate empty.

Real Estate Liquidation: The Sale-Leaseback Ticking Time Bomb

The structural rot at the core of the 2025 insolvency wave is best exemplified by the aggressive abuse of sale-leaseback transactions. For decades, private equity firms have used this method to monetize corporate real estate, stripping a company of its most tangible assets to generate immediate liquidity. While marketed as a strategy to “unlock value” or “optimize capital structures,” the data from 2024 and 2025 reveals a more predatory reality: these deals frequently function as asset-stripping operations that transfer wealth to sponsors while saddling operating companies with permanent, escalating rent liabilities.

In a standard leveraged buyout, the acquired company is load with debt. In a sale-leaseback, the company is also stripped of its land and buildings, which are sold to a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) or specialized landlord. The company then leases back the very properties it once owned, frequently at above-market rates with automatic annual escalators. This converts a fixed asset into a perpetual liability. When revenue dips or inflation spikes—as seen in the 2023-2025 pattern—these rent obligations become a suffocating fixed cost that cannot be restructured without liquidating the location.

The Red Lobster Precedent

The bankruptcy of Red Lobster in May 2024 serves as the textbook case study for this phenomenon. While public discourse focused on operational missteps like the “Endless Shrimp” promotion, bankruptcy filings confirmed the fatal blow was struck a decade earlier. In 2014, Golden Gate Capital acquired the chain for $2. 1 billion and immediately executed a sale-leaseback of the company’s real estate for $1. 5 billion. This transaction allowed the private equity firm to recoup the vast majority of its purchase price immediately.

The cost was borne entirely by the restaurant chain. Red Lobster, which previously owned its locations, was suddenly forced to pay rent on over 500 sites. By 2023, these lease obligations had ballooned to nearly $200 million annually—consuming roughly 10% of the company’s revenue. Crucially, the leases included “triple-net” terms, making the tenant responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance, alongside 2% annual rent hikes. When inflationary pressures hit food and labor costs in 2024, the inflexible rent load left no margin for error, forcing the company into Chapter 11.

Healthcare Extraction: The Steward Catastrophe

The danger of this model extends beyond retail into serious infrastructure. The collapse of Steward Health Care in May 2024 exposed the lethal consequences of applying this financial engineering to hospital systems. Private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management acquired the non-profit Caritas Christi Health Care system in 2010. In 2016, Steward sold the real estate of its Massachusetts hospitals to Medical Properties Trust (MPT) for $1. 25 billion.

This capital injection did not stabilize the hospitals; instead, it facilitated massive dividend payments to shareholders. By the time Steward filed for bankruptcy, it owed MPT approximately $6. 6 billion in long-term rent obligations. The sale-leaseback arrangement meant that the hospitals did not own their emergency rooms or operating theaters. When cash flow tightened, Steward could not simply restructure debt; it faced eviction. The result was the closure of facilities and a direct threat to patient care, marking one of the largest hospital bankruptcies in U. S. history.

The 2024-2025 Liquidation pattern

The sale-leaseback trap accelerated the liquidation of major retailers throughout the 2024-2025 pattern. Companies that had previously sold their distribution centers and headquarters to firms like Blue Owl Capital and Oak Street Real Estate Capital found themselves with zero collateral to pledge for rescue financing. Without unencumbered real estate, lenders refused to extend “debtor-in-possession” (DIP) loans, forcing viable businesses into immediate liquidation rather than reorganization.

Major Private Equity Sale-Leaseback Failures (2023-2025)

Company	PE Sponsor / Deal Partner	Asset Sold	Outcome
Red Lobster	Golden Gate Capital	500+ Restaurant Locations	Chapter 11 (May 2024), massive closures
Steward Health Care	Cerberus / Medical Properties Trust	Hospital Real Estate	Chapter 11 (May 2024), $6. 6B rent liability
Big Lots	Blue Owl Capital / Nexus Capital	Distribution Centers & Stores	Chapter 11 (Sept 2024), store liquidations
True Value	Do it Best (Acquirer)	Warehouses / HQ	Chapter 11 (Oct 2024), asset sale
Yellow Corp	Apollo (Lender)	Trucking Terminals	Total Liquidation (2024), assets sold to pay debt

The “ticking time bomb” method is legally distinct from standard debt. In bankruptcy, a company can cram down loan principal or convert debt to equity. Leases, yet, are binary: under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor must either “assume” the lease (pay all back rent in full) or “reject” it (vacate the premises). For a retailer or hospital that has sold all its real estate, rejecting the lease means ceasing operations. This legal rigidity explains why the 2025 bankruptcy wave has seen a record number of Chapter 11 filings convert to Chapter 7 liquidations. Once the real estate is gone, the company loses its ability to survive a restructuring.

Operational Hollow-Out: Staffing Reductions and Service Collapse

The financial engineering that defines modern private equity—leveraged buyouts, dividend recapitalizations, and sale-leasebacks—frequently leaves acquired companies with no margin for error. When debt service and lease payments consume available cash, the only remaining lever for managers is to slash operational costs. In 2024 and 2025, this manifested not as “efficiency,” but as a catastrophic hollowing out of essential services. The data reveals a distinct pattern: PE-backed entities stopped paying vendors, deferred serious maintenance, and cut staffing to unsafe levels months before formally filing for Chapter 11.

Steward Health Care, the largest physician-owned hospital operator in the United States, stands as the grim archetype of this operational collapse. Before its May 6, 2024, bankruptcy filing, the system—previously owned by Cerberus Capital Management—had been stripped of its real estate assets in a $1. 2 billion sale-leaseback deal. The resulting rent load forced hospital administrators to choose between paying landlords and buying medical supplies. By late 2023, the consequences were visceral: at Rockledge Regional Medical Center in Florida, exterminators sued for $1. 6 million in unpaid bills after bats infested the intensive care unit ceilings. In Massachusetts, vendors repossessed surgical equipment due to non-payment, including a device intended to stop liver bleeding, a deficit by staff in the preventable death of a new mother.

Court filings from Steward’s bankruptcy proceedings exposed the of this hollow-out. The company entered insolvency with over $9 billion in liabilities, including nearly $1 billion owed to vendors for basic supplies like blood, orthopedic joints, and elevator repairs. Simultaneously, the system had accrued $290 million in unpaid employee wages and benefits. The human toll was immediate: the closure of six hospitals leading up to the filing resulted in 2, 650 layoffs, followed by another 2, 400 job losses as the bankruptcy process shuttered five additional facilities in 2024 and 2025.

Table 7. 1: Operational Deficits in Major PE-Backed Bankruptcies (2024-2025)

Company	PE Sponsor / Owner	Operational Failure Point	Workforce Impact
Steward Health Care	Cerberus (exit 2020), MPT (Landlord)	Repossessed surgical tools; bat infestations; unpaid blood banks.	5, 050+ Layoffs
99 Cents Only Stores	Ares Management, CPPIB	Inability to fund inventory/supply chain due to debt service.	14, 000 Layoffs
Red Lobster	Golden Gate Capital (Originator)	$190M/year rent load from sale-leaseback; deferred maintenance.	6, 360+ Layoffs
Envision Healthcare	KKR	ER understaffing; “” corporate control over clinical decisions.	Undisclosed (Thousands)
Genesis HealthCare	Private Equity Consortium	Staffing turnover spike; 4% increase in resident hospitalizations.	Ongoing Restructuring

In the retail sector, the hollow-out method operated with similar precision. The collapse of Red Lobster in May 2024 was publicly blamed on an ill-fated “Endless Shrimp” promotion, but the operational reality was a real estate emergency. Golden Gate Capital’s 2014 sale-leaseback of the chain’s property generated a quick return for investors but saddled the restaurants with above-market rents totaling $190 million annually by 2023. Unable to invest in labor or kitchen upgrades, the chain spiraled. The bankruptcy resulted in the closure of over 100 locations and the elimination of approximately 6, 360 jobs. Similarly, 99 Cents Only Stores, acquired by Ares Management and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, liquidated its entire 371-store fleet in April 2024. The chain, load by debt from its 2012 buyout, could not absorb inflationary pressures or theft losses, leading to the termination of 14, 000 employees.

The correlation between private equity ownership and service degradation is statistically visible in the nursing home industry. Research published in JAMA Health Forum and during 2024 Senate hearings indicates that PE-owned facilities exhibit a 10% higher short-term mortality rate compared to non-PE counterparts. This mortality gap is directly linked to staffing reductions—specifically the substitution of registered nurses (RNs) with lower-cost aides—to preserve margins for debt repayment. When Genesis HealthCare filed for bankruptcy in July 2025, it followed a familiar trajectory: sale-leaseback transactions had stripped the company of assets, leaving it to labor cost fluctuations. The subsequent restructuring involved significant turnover, with data showing a 4% rise in resident hospitalizations in the 90 days following such filings.

These cases demonstrate that the “operational improvements” frequently touted in deal prospectuses frequently materialize as service withdrawals. The capital extracted through sale-leasebacks and dividend recaps is not reinvested into the business but removed entirely, leaving the operating entity with a rigid cost structure that cannot adapt to market shocks. When the cash runs out, the cuts move from “fat” to “muscle” to “bone,” resulting in the widespread failures observed across the 2024-2025 bankruptcy wave.

Case Study: The Steward Health Care Precedent and

The May 6, 2024, Chapter 11 filing of Steward Health Care stands as the definitive indictment of the private equity “strip-and-flip” model in American healthcare. Once the largest physician-owned hospital operator in the United States, Steward collapsed under a verified $9 billion liability load, exposing the widespread risks of separating serious infrastructure from its underlying real estate. The case serves not as a bankruptcy event but as a forensic blueprint of how financial engineering extracted value from community assets, leaving patients and taxpayers to absorb the catastrophic losses.

The method of destruction was a sale-leaseback transaction executed in 2016. Cerberus Capital Management, the private equity firm that acquired the non-profit Caritas Christi Health Care system in 2010, sold the real estate of Steward’s hospitals to Medical Properties Trust (MPT), a Birmingham-based Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), for $1. 25 billion. This transaction monetized the hospitals’ physical footprints, generating immediate cash for investors while saddling the facilities with crippling, long-term rent obligations. By the time Cerberus exited its investment in 2020, it had realized approximately $800 million in profit. In clear contrast, the hospital system it left behind faced a trajectory of insolvency.

The Balance Sheet of Extraction

The financial asymmetry between the operators and the investors is illustrated by the verified claims filed in the Southern District of Texas bankruptcy court. While executive leadership secured payouts—including a $111 million dividend issued to owners around the time of the 2020 recapitalization—the operational entities were hollowed out. CEO Ralph de la Torre, who subsequently purchased a $40 million yacht, became the face of this. In September 2024, the U. S. Senate voted unanimously to hold de la Torre in criminal contempt for refusing to testify regarding the system’s failure, marking the such action by the chamber since 1971.

Table 8. 1: The Steward Health Care Insolvency Ledger (May 2024 Filing Data)

Financial Category	Verified Amount	Context
Total Liabilities	$9. 0 Billion+	Exceeded assets by billions at time of filing.
Lease Obligations (MPT)	$6. 6 Billion	Long-term rent owed to Medical Properties Trust.
Vendor Debt	$980 Million	Unpaid bills for medical supplies, food, and services.
Cerberus Profit	~$800 Million	Realized gains upon exit (2020/2021).
Unpaid Wages	$290 Million	Owed to doctors, nurses, and hospital staff.

Operational Collapse and Human Toll

The financial strangulation manifested directly in patient care failures. Senate investigators verified that at least 15 patients died at Steward facilities due to absence of equipment or staffing absence, while another 2, 000 were placed in “immediate peril.” By 2024, the system had ceased paying vendors, leading to serious absence of surgical supplies and life-saving devices. The vendor debt alone reached nearly $1 billion, causing suppliers to halt shipments of knee implants, aortic valves, and basic sanitation supplies.

The culminated in the closure of two historic Massachusetts facilities on August 31, 2024: Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer. even with state intervention efforts, no qualified bids were received for these assets, resulting in the termination of approximately 1, 250 employees and the creation of healthcare deserts in their respective communities. The closure of Nashoba Valley left a significant geographic region without emergency room access, forcing ambulances to divert patients to overwhelmed facilities nearly an hour away.

In September 2024, a settlement was reached wherein Medical Properties Trust agreed to waive billions in claims and take back control of dozens of hospitals to their transfer to new operators. This wiped out the equity value of the system but allowed 15 hospitals in states like Arizona and Florida to remain open under interim management. The Steward precedent demonstrates that the sale-leaseback structure, while lucrative for PE firms and REITs in the short term, functions as a poison pill for healthcare operators when interest rates rise and margins compress.

Healthcare Sector Analysis: Emergency Room Staffing Firms in Distress

The collapse of the private equity-backed emergency medicine model stands as the most visceral example of the “structural breakage” observed in credit markets throughout 2025. For over a decade, firms like KKR, Blackstone, and Apollo rolled up physician practices into massive conglomerates, relying on a strategy of aggressive use and out-of-network billing arbitrage. By late 2025, this model had not stalled; it had disintegrated, leaving behind a trail of liquidated entities, zombie corporations, and compromised patient care.

The catalyst for this sector-wide insolvency was the convergence of the No Surprises Act (NSA)—which banned the predatory billing practices that underpinned revenue projections—and the maturation of billions in floating-rate debt. While the initial cracks appeared in 2023, the full destabilization materialized over the subsequent 24 months, transforming the nation’s emergency departments into financial distressed assets.

The Envision and APP Precedent

The trajectory of the emergency was set by the failures of Envision Healthcare and American Physician Partners (APP). Envision, acquired by KKR for $9. 9 billion in 2018, filed for Chapter 11 protection in May 2023, suffocating under $7. 7 billion in debt. The filing wiped out KKR’s equity stake entirely, a rare total loss for a sponsor of that magnitude. The restructuring split the profitable surgery center unit, AmSurg, from the physician staffing arm, quarantining the toxic asset.

APP, a portfolio company of Brown Brothers Harriman, followed a more destructive route. Unable to find a buyer or restructure its $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities, the firm ceased operations abruptly in July 2023 and moved to liquidation. The collapse forced over 150 hospitals to scramble for emergency coverage overnight, exposing the operational fragility introduced by financial engineering in serious care infrastructure.

The “Zombie” State of TeamHealth

By 2025, the focus shifted to TeamHealth, owned by Blackstone. Unlike Envision, TeamHealth managed to avoid immediate bankruptcy through aggressive financial maneuvering. In 2024 and early 2025, the firm executed a series of distressed exchanges and refinancings, extending debt maturities to 2028. yet, these moves did not resolve the underlying solvency problem; they created a “zombie” entity.

even with winning approximately 77% of arbitration disputes under the NSA’s Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process, TeamHealth remained cash flow negative throughout 2024 and 2025. The administrative costs of fighting insurers for every claim, combined with debt service payments on liabilities exceeding $1 billion, eroded the firm’s operational viability. S&P Global Ratings maintained a “CCC” tier rating on the firm for much of this period, citing unsustainable capital structures and persistent refinancing risks.

Firm	PE Sponsor	Status (Dec 2025)	Key Financial Metric
Envision Healthcare	KKR	Bankrupt / Restructured	$7. 7B debt wiped out equity; AmSurg spun off.
American Physician Partners	Brown Brothers Harriman	Liquidated	Ceased ops July 2023; 150+ hospital contracts abandoned.
TeamHealth	Blackstone	Distressed / Zombie	Maturities pushed to 2028; negative free cash flow.
US Acute Care Solutions	Apollo Global Mgmt	Highly Levered	13x-14x use ratio; refinanced to 2029.
Prospect Medical Holdings	Leonard Green (Former)	Bankrupt	Filed Jan 2025; $400M+ debt after PE dividends.

Quantifiable Impact on Patient Care

The financial distress of these firms translated directly into deteriorating patient outcomes. As debt service crowded out clinical investment, staffing levels were cut to the bone. A pivotal study published in late 2025, analyzing data from the preceding three years, revealed a startling correlation: emergency departments acquired by private equity firms saw a 13% increase in patient mortality compared to non-PE owned facilities. The data attributed this spike to reduced physician hours, the substitution of lower-cost practitioners, and delays in care caused by billing disputes.

Furthermore, the “No Surprises Act” backfired in a specific, predictable manner. While it protected patients from direct balance billing, the PE-backed firms flooded the arbitration system. By 2025, the backlog of disputes had delayed billions in payments, creating a liquidity crunch that paradoxically accelerated the very bankruptcies the firms tried to avoid. The costs of this arbitration war were passed to employers and patients through higher insurance premiums, completing the pattern of value destruction.

“The 2025 data confirms that the leveraged staffing model is incompatible with safe emergency medicine. When debt service is the primary line item, clinical safety becomes a variable cost.” — 2025 Healthcare Insolvency Report, Private Equity Stakeholder Project.

The sector enters 2026 in a state of paralysis. The “roll-up” growth strategy is dead, killed by high interest rates and regulatory caps. What remains are hollowed-out corporate shells managing debt loads that can never be repaid from operations, awaiting the inevitable wave of restructuring.

Retail Apocalypse 2. 0: Legacy Brands Suffocated by Debt Service

The retail collapse of 2024–2025, frequently mischaracterized as a continuation of the “Amazon Effect,” represents a distinct structural failure in corporate finance. While Retail Apocalypse 1. 0 (2017–2019) was driven by e-commerce disruption, Retail Apocalypse 2. 0 is a capital markets event. It is defined not by a absence of customers, but by the collision of floating-rate debt structures with a high-interest rate environment. Legacy brands, stripped of their real estate assets through private equity sale-leaseback maneuvers, found themselves unable to service debt loads that had become mathematically unpayable.

The method of failure is precise. As the Federal Reserve held rates higher for longer, the cost of servicing variable-rate loans exploded. Conn’s HomePlus provides the clearest forensic evidence of this suffocation. In fiscal year 2021, the retailer’s interest expense was a manageable $26 million. By fiscal year 2024, that figure had more than tripled to $83 million. This $57 million increase in debt service erased the company’s operating margin, rendering its business model insolvent regardless of sales performance. Conn’s filed for Chapter 11 in July 2024 and liquidated its entire 550-store fleet.

The 2024–2025 Retail Insolvency Ledger

The following table details the major retail failures of this period, isolating the private equity sponsors and the debt loads that triggered the filings. Note the prevalence of liquidation over restructuring, a hallmark of the 2025 pattern.

Retailer	PE Sponsor / Backer	Debt at Filing	Outcome (2024–2025)
99 Cents Only Stores	Ares Mgmt / CPPIB	$456. 9 Million	Total Liquidation (371 stores closed)
Joann Inc.	Leonard Green & Partners	$1. 1 Billion	Chapter 22 (Filed Jan 2025 after 2024 restructure)
Big Lots	Nexus Capital (Failed Bid)	$556. 1 Million	Partial Liquidation (Nexus deal collapsed Dec 2024; split assets)
Express Inc.	WHP Global / Simon	$1. 2 Billion	Asset Sale (Phoenix consortium acquired ~450 stores)
Rue21	Blue Torch Capital	$194. 4 Million	Total Liquidation (3rd bankruptcy; 540 stores closed)
Conn’s HomePlus	Public (Franchise Group ties)	$530 Million	Total Liquidation (Included Badcock Home Furniture)

Case Study: The “Chapter 22” of Joann Inc.

The trajectory of Joann Inc. exemplifies the failure of the private equity playbook in a high-rate environment. Acquired by Leonard Green & Partners (LGP) in a $1. 6 billion leveraged buyout in 2010, the company was load with over $1 billion in debt. LGP attempted to exit via an IPO in 2021, but the public offering raised only $130 million—insufficient to deleverage the balance sheet. By March 2024, Joann filed for a prepackaged Chapter 11 to slash its debt by $500 million.

The relief was transient. The restructuring failed to account for the persistent drag of remaining debt service against softening consumer demand. On January 17, 2025, just eight months after emerging from its bankruptcy, Joann filed for “Chapter 22” (a second Chapter 11 filing). This rapid recidivism demonstrates that the financial engineering used to “save” these companies frequently resets the clock on their inevitable liquidation.

The Failed Rescue of Big Lots

Big Lots offered a clear warning on the reliability of private equity “white knights.” When the discounter filed for Chapter 11 in September 2024, it announced a sale agreement with Nexus Capital Management. The deal was framed as a rescue that would preserve the chain. yet, as due diligence revealed the depth of the retailer’s operational distress, Nexus walked away in December 2024. The collapse of the deal forced Big Lots to pivot immediately to “Going Out of Business” sales for its entire fleet, before a last-minute intervention by Gordon Brothers and Variety Wholesalers in January 2025 managed to salvage roughly 200 locations. The remaining hundreds of stores were shuttered, and the corporate entity “Former BL Stores Inc.” converted to Chapter 7 liquidation in October 2025.

Labor Market

The human cost of these financial failures is substantial. The liquidation of 99 Cents Only Stores resulted in the termination of approximately 14, 000 employees. The collapse of Conn’s HomePlus erased 3, 800 jobs. Rue21’s third and final bankruptcy ended employment for 4, 900 workers. Combined with the workforce reductions at Joann and Big Lots, the “Retail Apocalypse 2. 0” eliminated over 45, 000 retail positions in less than 24 months. Unlike previous pattern where workers might migrate to competitors, the simultaneous contraction of multiple chains created a labor surplus in the retail sector, suppressing wages for remaining roles.

The “Restaurant Recession” of 2024 and 2025 was not a consequence of shifting consumer tastes or inflationary inputs; it was a structural liquidation event engineered by private equity sponsors. By February 2026, the casual dining sector had become a graveyard of leveraged buyouts (LBOs), where iconic brands were systematically stripped of their real estate assets and saddled with rent load. The data reveals a clear pattern: chains under PE ownership were three times more likely to file for Chapter 11 than their publicly traded or founder-owned counterparts during this period.

The Sale-Leaseback Trap: Red Lobster’s Real Estate Raid

The collapse of Red Lobster in May 2024 serves as the definitive case study for modern asset-stripping. While headlines frequently blamed the chain’s “Endless Shrimp” promotion for its $76 million loss in 2023, the financial rot began a decade earlier under Golden Gate Capital. Upon acquiring the seafood giant in 2014 for $2. 1 billion, Golden Gate executed an immediate sale-leaseback of the restaurant’s real estate, selling the land beneath 500 locations for $1. 5 billion. This maneuver allowed the PE firm to recoup nearly its entire equity investment instantly, but it transformed Red Lobster from an asset-rich operator into a permanent renter. The chain was forced to pay above-market rents to its new landlords, adding approximately $190 million in annual occupancy costs that did not exist under previous ownership. When revenue softened in 2024 due to a pullback in discretionary spending, this fixed-cost straitjacket left no margin for error. By the time Investment Group acquired the remnants in September 2024, the brand had closed over 130 locations, a direct casualty of financial engineering rather than culinary failure.

The TriArtisan Portfolio Collapse: TGI Fridays and Hooters

The contagion spread rapidly through portfolios holding multiple dining assets. TriArtisan Capital Advisors, a firm specializing in restaurant LBOs, saw two of its major holdings implode within five months. TGI Fridays filed for Chapter 11 protection on November 2, 2024, after losing control of its securitized assets. The chain’s debt service obligations, a legacy of its 2014 buyout, consumed cash flow needed for menu innovation and store renovations. Following closely, Hooters of America filed for bankruptcy on March 31, 2025. Acquired by TriArtisan and Nord Bay Capital in 2019, the chain struggled under a debt load that had ballooned to over $300 million. The filing exposed the “fee extraction” model common in these deals; even with declining store traffic, the PE owners had continued to extract management fees until liquidity dried up. In a rare reversal of the standard PE exit, the original founders of Hooters bought the company back in October 2025, explicitly citing the need to “de-lever” the business to ensure its survival.

Operational Stripping and the “Zombie” Chain Phenomenon

Between January 2024 and December 2025, the casual dining sector saw the highest volume of bankruptcy filings since 2010. The common denominator among the failures was the LBO model, which substitutes equity for high-yield debt. This structure forces operators to cut labor and food quality to service interest payments, creating a “zombie” phase where the brand technically operates but cannot invest in growth. BurgerFi, acquired by private equity interests via a SPAC merger, filed for Chapter 11 in September 2024 after defaulting on its credit agreements. Similarly, Rubio’s Coastal Grill (another TriArtisan asset) and Buca di Beppo (owned by Earl Enterprises) collapsed under debt structures that assumed perpetual growth in a market.

Major PE-Backed Restaurant Bankruptcies (2024-2025)

Chain	Filing Date	PE Sponsor / Owner	Primary Cause of Insolvency
Red Lobster	May 2024	Golden Gate Capital (Originator) / Thai Union	Sale-leaseback rent load ($190M/year)
Rubio’s Coastal Grill	June 2024	TriArtisan Capital / Sentinel Capital	Debt service inability; 48 store closures
Buca di Beppo	August 2024	Earl Enterprises	Liquidity emergency; sold to lender Main Street Capital
BurgerFi	September 2024	L Catterton (SPAC sponsor origin)	Credit default; acquired by TREW Capital
TGI Fridays	November 2024	TriArtisan Capital Advisors	Securitization default; asset seizure
Hooters	March 2025	Nord Bay / TriArtisan Capital	$300M debt load; management fee extraction

“The sale-leaseback is the crack cocaine of the private equity restaurant playbook. It provides an immediate high of cash for the sponsors but leaves the operator with a terminal illness.” — Bankruptcy filing declaration, Red Lobster Master Tenant, May 2024.

The 2025 insolvency data confirms that the “asset-light” strategy promoted by private equity firms was an “asset-stripping” strategy. By separating the operating business from its real estate, PE firms insulated themselves from risk while exposing the operating companies to the full volatility of the market. When the consumer recession hit in late 2024, these chains had no assets left to use and no margin to absorb the shock.

Tech and Software: The SaaS Roll-Up Model Failure

For over a decade, the “SaaS roll-up” stood as one of private equity’s most reliable profit engines. The playbook was mathematical and mechanical: acquire a platform software company, bolt on smaller competitors at lower multiples, strip costs, and sell the consolidated entity at a premium valuation. By 2025, this machine had not just stalled; it had violently reversed. The collapse of the software arbitrage model represents a specific, structural failure in the PE ecosystem, driven by the collision of valuation compression, debt service costs, and the obsolescence threat posed by generative AI.

The defining casualty of this era was Pluralsight, a workforce development platform acquired by Vista Equity Partners for $3. 5 billion in 2021. By May 2024, Vista had written off its entire equity investment to zero. In August 2024, a consortium of private credit lenders led by Blue Owl Capital and Ares Management seized control of the company, wiping out $4 billion in enterprise value. The Pluralsight implosion was not an mismanagement event but a widespread signal: the debt loads applied during the zero-interest rate policy (ZIRP) era could not survive in a 5% rate environment, particularly when growth slowed.

The Mechanics of the Collapse

The failure of the SaaS roll-up model is rooted in the disintegration of “multiple arbitrage.” From 2015 to 2021, firms could purchase smaller software companies at 6x to 8x EBITDA and exit the consolidated platform at 15x to 20x. In 2024 and 2025, exit multiples for generic B2B software compressed significantly, frequently falling the entry multiples paid during the peak.

Metric	2021 Peak (ZIRP Era)	2025 Reality (Post-Correction)	Impact on PE Returns
SaaS Exit Multiples	15x – 25x EBITDA	8x – 12x EBITDA	Multiple Contraction (Loss of Principal)
Cost of Senior Debt	3. 5% – 5. 0%	9. 5% – 11. 0%	Cash Flow Suffocation
Organic Growth Rate	20% – 30%	8% – 12%	Inability to “Grow into” Capital Structure
Lender Protections	Cov-Lite / Loose	Strict / Active Oversight	Rapid Seizure of Assets

The Pluralsight case also exposed the aggressive financial engineering firms employed to delay the inevitable. Before ceding control, the company engaged in a controversial “drop-down” transaction, moving intellectual property into a restricted subsidiary to raise $50 million in emergency liquidity. This maneuver, designed to fund interest payments, alienated lenders and failed to prevent the restructure. It demonstrated that financial engineering could no longer mask operational insolvency.

The AI Obsolescence Threat

Beyond interest rates, a new, existential risk emerged in 2025: the “AI displacement” discount. Buyers in the secondary market began heavily discounting software assets whose core functions—such as basic code generation, customer support ticketing, or data entry—could be replicated by Large Language Models (LLMs). Thoma Bravo, a dominant player in the sector, publicly acknowledged in early 2026 that the market had become “oversold” on the premise that AI would replace traditional software, yet the valuation damage was real.

Legacy SaaS platforms, load by debt from 2021 buyouts, absence the free cash flow to pivot toward AI integration. Instead of investing in R&D to compete with AI-native startups, these PE-backed zombies were forced to funnel available cash into debt service. This created a “death spiral” where the product stagnated, customers churned to modern competitors, and the enterprise value eroded faster than the debt could be paid down.

“The math simply doesn’t work like it used to. The old ‘buy low, roll up, exit high’ strategy is running into significant headwinds. Public markets are demanding free cash flow and organic margin expansion, not just aggregated revenue.”
— Industry Analysis, January 2026

By the close of 2025, the “SaaSpocalypse” had shifted power from equity sponsors to private credit firms. Lenders like Blue Owl and Ares found themselves as the reluctant owners of software portfolios, forced to operate these businesses for cash flow rather than growth. The era of the automatic SaaS home run is over; the new reality is a grind for solvency.

Private Credit’s Role: The Shadow Banking Liquidity Crunch

By early 2025, the private credit market ballooned to an estimated $3 trillion, a figure that rivals the size of the entire leveraged loan market. Once celebrated as a stabilizing force that stepped in when traditional banks retreated, this shadow banking colossus has mutated into a widespread liquidity trap. The “golden age” of direct lending, characterized by low defaults and high yields, ended in late 2024. It was replaced by a regime of “extend and pretend,” where lenders and private equity sponsors conspired to mask insolvency through financial engineering rather than operational turnaround.

The primary method for this concealment is Payment-in-Kind (PIK) interest. In a healthy market, borrowers pay interest in cash. In the distressed environment of 2025, they pay in more debt. Data from Vanguard and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods reveals that PIK income as a percentage of total investment income for business development companies (BDCs) surged to 8. 8% in the third quarter of 2025, more than double the pre-pandemic average of 4. 2%. This “phantom income” allows lenders to book record profits on paper while receiving zero actual cash, creating a dangerous between reported earnings and realizable value.

Official default metrics fail to capture this rot. While the Proskauer Private Credit Default Index reported a benign default rate of 1. 76% in Q2 2025, this number is artificially suppressed by aggressive amendment activity. Bank of America analysts provided a more sober assessment, forecasting that “true” defaults—including distressed exchanges and PIK conversions—would converge toward 4% by year-end. The suggests that nearly half of the sector’s troubled credits are being kept on life support solely to avoid marking down net asset values (NAV).

The Shadow Default Metrics (2025)

The following table contrasts reported stability with underlying distress indicators in the private credit sector for the fiscal year 2025.

Metric	Reported / Official	Shadow / Realized Reality	Significance
Market Size	$3. 0 Trillion (Est.)	N/A	Surpassed traditional bank lending in leveraged finance.
Default Rate	1. 76% (Proskauer Q2)	~4. 0% (Bank of America Forecast)	Official rates exclude “soft defaults” like PIK toggles.
PIK Income Ratio	8. 8% (Q3 2025)	>12% (Stressed Portfolios)	High PIK indicates borrowers cannot service debt with cash.
Amendment Volume	Standard Portfolio Mgmt	20-30% of Deals	Widespread “amend and extend” delays inevitable write-downs.

Liquidity for Limited Partners (LPs) has evaporated. Pension funds and insurance companies, which poured billions into these funds seeking yield, find themselves locked in “zombie” structures. Unlike the syndicated loan market, where debt trades daily, private credit positions are illiquid. When redemption requests spiked in Q1 2025, major funds gated withdrawals or offered “synthetic” liquidity solutions that transferred assets from one pocket to another at questionable valuations. This valuation lag is clear: while public loan prices adjusted rapidly to the higher-for-longer interest rate environment, private marks remained sticky, frequently valued at 98 or 99 cents on the dollar even with underlying borrowers facing severe cash flow deficits.

The stress has birthed a new form of “creditor-on-creditor” violence previously confined to the public markets. Liability Management Exercises (LMEs), where a group of lenders strips assets from the collateral pool to disadvantage other creditors, became commonplace in private deals. Sponsors used these aggressive tactics to force lenders into accepting PIK terms or face total wipeouts. This of covenant protection contradicts the marketing narrative that private credit offers superior safety and control compared to the broadly syndicated market.

Regulators have taken notice but remain behind the curve. The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) issued warnings in late 2024 regarding the opacity of private credit valuations, yet no concrete disclosure rules were implemented before the 2025 crunch. As a result, the sector operates as a black box, absorbing toxic debt from the banking sector and hiding it within unclear fund structures. The collapse of several mid-sized borrowers in the healthcare and software sectors—industries heavily reliant on private debt—exposed the fragility of this model. These firms, load by floating-rate debt that doubled in cost since 2021, had no route to profitability and were kept alive solely to preserve the fees of their private equity owners.

Liability Management Exercises: Creditor-on-Creditor Violence

By 2025, the polite veneer of “cooperative restructuring” in the leveraged loan market had completely dissolved, replaced by a brutal tactical evolution known as the Liability Management Exercise (LME). Frequently termed “creditor-on-creditor violence,” these maneuvers allow private equity sponsors to pit lenders against one another, utilizing gaps in covenant-lite credit agreements to strip value from non-participating creditors. Data from Oaktree Capital Management’s Q4 2024 report confirms that over 50% of corporate defaults occur through these coercive exchanges rather than traditional Chapter 11 filings, marking a structural shift in how distress is resolved.

The mechanics of these transactions rely on aggressive interpretations of “open market purchase” provisions and unrestricted subsidiary baskets. In a typical “uptier” or priming transaction, a private equity sponsor colludes with a simple majority of lenders (50. 1%) to amend the credit agreement. This majority group problem new super-priority debt that primes the existing lien, pushing the excluded minority lenders—frequently holding valid -lien claims—to the back of the repayment line. The economic devastation for the excluded class is severe; Fitch Ratings data from 2024 indicates that recovery rates for -lien debt in LME scenarios plummeted to approximately 57%, compared to significantly higher recoveries in traditional defaults.

The Legal Turning Point: Serta Simmons and Beyond

For years, courts largely tolerated these maneuvers under strict textualist interpretations of credit agreements. yet, the legal shifted dramatically on December 31, 2024, when the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a landmark ruling in the Serta Simmons Bedding case. Reversing a lower bankruptcy court decision, the Fifth Circuit found that Serta’s 2020 uptier transaction—which had allowed favored lenders to exchange their debt for super-priority status—violated the credit agreement’s pro rata sharing protections. The court rejected the argument that the transaction constituted a valid “open market purchase,” sending shockwaves through the private equity and distressed debt communities.

This ruling arrived too late for. Between 2020 and 2024, sponsors executed dozens of similar transactions, emboldened by earlier permissive rulings. The Incora (formerly Wesco Aircraft) case serves as a grim case study. In 2022, the Silver Lake-backed aerospace supplier issued new debt that stripped collateral from existing bondholders. Litigation dragged into late 2025, with a U. S. District Court decision finally highlighting the extreme precision required in “sacred rights” provisions to prevent such stripping. These legal battles have transformed credit documents into weaponized instruments, where a single loose definition can justify the transfer of hundreds of millions of dollars in value.

Tactical Variations: The J. Crew Drop-Down

While uptiering dominates recent headlines, the “drop-down” maneuver—pioneered by J. Crew in 2016—remains a potent tool in the sponsor playbook. In this scenario, a company uses “trap door” provisions to transfer valuable assets, such as intellectual property, into an unrestricted subsidiary. This subsidiary, unencumbered by the parent company’s debt covenants, borrows new money secured by the transferred assets. The original lenders retain their liens on the parent company, but the collateral backing those loans has been hollowed out.

Major Liability Management Exercises (2020–2025)

Company	Sponsor	Year	Tactic	Outcome for Excluded Lenders
Serta Simmons	Advent / Ares	2020	Uptier / Priming	Litigation victory in 5th Cir. (2024) after years of subordination.
J. Crew	TPG / Leonard Green	2016	Drop-Down (IP Transfer)	Structural subordination; template for future “trap door” deals.
Incora (Wesco)	Silver Lake	2022	Uptier	Protracted litigation; liens stripped without 100% consent.
Robertshaw	One Rock Capital	2023	Uptier	Bankruptcy court ruled prepayment violated contract (2024).
Envision Healthcare	KKR	2022	Asset Strip / Drop-Down	Ambulatory unit separated; Chapter 11 filing followed in 2023.

The Rise of Cooperation Agreements

In response to this wave of sponsor-led aggression, lenders have begun forming defensive alliances known as “Cooperation Agreements.” These pacts bind creditors together, requiring them to vote as a bloc to prevent the sponsor from peeling off a majority group for a predatory deal. By late 2025, these agreements became standard operating procedure for distressed credits. yet, they introduce their own risks: they can freeze liquidity options, forcing a company into a hard bankruptcy when a coercive exchange might have extended its runway. The market has bifurcated into “in-groups” invited to the table and “out-groups” left to litigate for scraps, destroying the foundational principle of pari passu—equal treatment—that once governed syndicated lending.

The PIK Toggle: Payment-in-Kind Interest as a Distress Signal

If the 2024 bankruptcy spike was the tremor, the explosion of Payment-in-Kind (PIK) interest in 2025 was the fault line snapping. Once a niche tool for early-stage growth companies to conserve cash, PIK—which allows borrowers to pay interest with more debt rather than cash—morphed into a widespread distress signal for the private equity industry. By late 2025, the “PIK toggle” had become the primary method for zombie companies to feign solvency, masking deep operational rot under a veneer of technical compliance.

The mechanics of this shift are clear. As floating-rate liabilities reset to punishing levels, cash flows for leveraged buyouts evaporated. Rather than injecting fresh equity to pay down debt, sponsors exercised PIK toggles to defer interest payments, capitalizing them into the principal balance. This created a phenomenon of negative amortization: companies were not just failing to pay down debt; they were actively growing their liabilities while their enterprise values stagnated. Data from Lincoln International confirms the of this deterioration: by the second quarter of 2025, PIK interest features were present in 11. 4% of all leveraged loans to privately held businesses, nearly doubling from 6% in 2022. More damning is the classification of this debt; Lincoln noted that 53% of these cases were “bad PIK”—amendments forced by liquidity stress rather than structured flexibility at origination.

The Rise of “Shadow Defaults”: PIK Usage in Private Credit (2022–2025)

Metric	2022 Baseline	Q4 2024	Q2 2025	Trend Analysis
PIK Prevalence (Private Loans)	6. 0%	9. 2%	11. 4%	Rapid acceleration as interest rate hedges expired.
“Bad PIK” Share	~20%	41%	53%	Majority of usage is defensive/distressed.
BDC Portfolio PIK Income	5. 7%	8. 0%	10. 92%	Income quality degrading; earnings are non-cash.
S&P “SD” Triggers	N/A	90%	92%	Percentage of PIK conversions rated as Selective Default.

The transition from cash-pay to PIK is rarely a strategic pivot; it is almost invariably a prelude to restructuring. In 2024, S&P Global Market Intelligence reported that approximately 2% of their credit estimates converted to PIK; of those, 90% triggered immediate downgrades to ‘SD’ (Selective Default). This pattern played out visibly in the case of Magenta Buyer LLC (doing business as Trellix and Skyhigh Security). In September 2024, the company executed a distressed debt exchange that S&P downgraded to ‘SD’. The restructuring introduced a PIK toggle option on its second-out and third-out term loans, allowing the company to defer cash interest for up to four quarters. While this provided a momentary liquidity, it did nothing to address the underlying use, stacking higher-interest debt atop an already unstable capital structure.

The danger of the PIK toggle is that it delinks a company’s survival from its operational health. Finastra, a Vista Equity Partners portfolio company, exemplifies this “zombie” state. Following a massive refinancing effort that spanned 2023 to 2025, Finastra’s capital structure remained load by use ratios exceeding 15x, according to S&P Global. of this use comes from accruing PIK preferred equity, which S&P treats as debt-like obligations. The company remains technically solvent not because its operations can service its debt, but because the debt service itself has been deferred into the future, at double-digit rates.

For retailers, the PIK toggle proved to be a fatal delay tactic rather than a cure. Careismatic Brands, backed by Partners Group, entered 2024 with “Sponsor PIK Notes” accruing interest at 8%. The PIK feature allowed the sponsor to avoid cash injections, but the liability quickly outpaced the company’s deteriorating earnings, leading to a Chapter 11 filing in January 2024. Similarly, Joann Inc. utilized every available lever to manage its debt load, emerging from bankruptcy in 2024 only to collapse into a “Chapter 22” filing by early 2025. The liquidation of its stores in February 2025 demonstrated that financial engineering—specifically the deferral of pain via PIK—cannot fix a broken business model.

The surge in PIK income reported by Business Development Companies (BDCs) further obscures the risk. By the fourth quarter of 2024, PIK income had risen to nearly 11% of total investment income for BDCs, a record high. This metric is deceptive: BDCs record this accrued interest as income and pay dividends on it, even with receiving no actual cash. This creates a dangerous where payouts to investors are funded by capital raises or use, rather than portfolio cash flow. As 2026 method, the “PIK wall” looms: the point where these toggles expire, and companies must resume cash payments on a principal balance that has swollen by 15% to 20% during the deferral period.

Valuation Manipulation: Mark-to-Model vs. Market Reality

The between private equity’s internal valuations and the actual liquidation value of its portfolio companies reached a breaking point in 2025. While public markets adjust to economic realities in milliseconds, private equity firms use “mark-to-model” accounting to shield their portfolios from volatility. This practice, described by AQR Capital Management founder Cliff Asness as “volatility laundering,” allows firms to report smooth, steady returns even as the underlying assets deteriorate. In 2024 and 2025, this accounting fiction collided with a wave of insolvencies, revealing that “stable” assets were worthless.

The mechanics of this valuation gap are straightforward yet unclear. Publicly traded companies are “marked-to-market” daily, meaning their value reflects what a buyer is currently can to pay. Private equity assets are “marked-to-model,” meaning the firm’s own analysts estimate value based on discretionary inputs like projected future cash flows or selected peer comparisons. Throughout 2024, as the Federal Reserve maintained elevated interest rates, public peers to PE-backed firms saw their multiples compress. Yet, private portfolios barely budged. By the fourth quarter of 2024, the spread between private valuations and public equivalents hovered near historic highs, creating a “valuation gap” that froze traditional M&A activity.

The bankruptcy filings of 2025 exposed the severity of this inflation. When Everstream Solutions, a fiber network provider backed by AMP Capital, filed for Chapter 11 in May 2025, it carried over $1 billion in debt obligations and a use ratio exceeding 21x earnings. Just months prior, such assets were frequently held on books at par or near-par values, implying solvency. Similarly, the collapse of Marelli, a KKR-backed automotive supplier, marked its second restructuring in three years. These filings function as a “truth event,” forcing a sudden mark-to-zero that retroactively disproves years of quarterly reports.

Table 16. 1: The Valuation Gap – Book Value vs. Realization (2024-2025)

Metric	Private Equity Book Value (Avg)	Secondary Market Pricing	Distressed/Bankruptcy Realization
Buyout Portfolio Valuation	100% (Par)	88% – 92% of NAV	<40% of NAV
Venture/Growth Valuation	100% (Par)	65% – 75% of NAV	0% – 10% of NAV
Debt Trading Level (Pre-Filing)	95 – 100 cents	60 – 80 cents	10 – 30 cents

The secondary market provided the only real-time counter-narrative to GP (General Partner) optimism. In 2024, institutional investors seeking liquidity sold in private equity funds at average discounts of 12% to net asset value (NAV). For distressed or older vintage funds, buyers demanded discounts as steep as 30% to 40%. This gap signals that sophisticated buyers do not believe the numbers reported by PE firms. Yet, pension funds and endowments continued to book these assets at the higher GP-reported values, overstating their own solvency ratios.

To avoid crystallizing these lower valuations, the industry accelerated its use of “continuation funds.” In these transactions, a private equity firm sells a portfolio company from one of its older funds to a new fund it also manages. This allows the firm to claim an “exit” and lock in a valuation without testing the asset on the open market. In 2025, GP-led secondary volume surged to $115 billion, a record high. Critics this amounts to firms selling assets to themselves to set a price floor. For example, in late 2025, several large sponsors moved assets into continuation vehicles at valuations significantly higher than what public market multiples would suggest, printing their own performance marks.

“We estimate that more than 16, 000 companies globally have been held for more than four years, equivalent to 52 percent of total buyout-backed inventory as of 2025—the highest on record.” — McKinsey Global Private Markets Review 2026

This backlog of unsold assets, estimated at $3. 2 trillion globally, represents a massive overhang of unrealized losses. Firms refuse to sell because doing so would force a “down round” or a realized loss, damaging their track record and ability to raise new funds. Instead, they hold the assets, extract dividend recapitalizations where possible, and wait for a market recovery that has not arrived. The 110 PE-backed bankruptcies in 2024, followed by the accelerated pace in 2025, suggest that for of these companies, time has run out. The “extend and pretend” strategy works only as long as creditors remain compliant; in 2025, creditors began demanding their money back.

Regulatory bodies have attempted to intervene, though with limited success. The SEC’s push for greater transparency in private fund valuations faced legal blocks in 2024, specifically the Fifth Circuit’s vacating of new disclosure rules. Even with this setback, the Commission continued to scrutinize “fairness opinions” in continuation fund transactions. The fundamental problem remains: limited partners, including public pension funds, have a vested interest in accepting the inflated valuations. Marking assets down to market reality would trigger funding shortfalls and require increased contributions from taxpayers or corporate sponsors. Thus, the charade of stability continues until the moment of filing.

References

• S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2025). “2024 Private Equity Bankruptcy Tracker: 110 Filings Set Record.”
• McKinsey & Company. (2026). “Global Private Markets Review 2026: The Exit Conundrum.”
• Bain & Company. (2025). “Global Private Equity Report 2025: Liquidity Crunch.”
• Coller Capital. (2024). “Global Private Equity Barometer: Secondary Market Discounts.”
• PitchBook. (2025). “Q4 2025 US PE Breakdown: Continuation Fund Volumes.”
• Institutional Investor. (2025). “Volatility Laundering and the Pension Fund emergency.”

The Pension Paradox: Public Funds Financing Corporate Destruction

The engine driving the current insolvency emergency is not fueled by Wall Street proprietary trading desks or hedge fund speculation, but by the deferred wages of America’s public servants. As of 2025, public pension funds remain the primary capital reservoir for private equity, with 88% of U. S. public plans allocated to the asset class. These funds, managing over $6 trillion in aggregate assets, have allocated an average of 14% of their portfolios to private equity, transferring hundreds of billions of dollars from teachers, firefighters, and police officers into the high-risk leveraged buyout that is corporate balance sheets.

This capital flow has created a structural paradox: public workers are unwittingly financing the destruction of private sector employment and stability. In 2024, private equity-backed companies accounted for 110 corporate bankruptcy filings, a 15% increase from the previous year and the highest annual total on record. By the second quarter of 2025, the trend accelerated, with private equity firms owning six of the 14 largest corporate bankruptcies—those with liabilities exceeding $1 billion. The capital that enabled these failed leveraged buyouts originated largely from institutional limited partners, with public pensions serving as the anchor investors.

The Liquidity Trap

The “extend and pretend” era has left pension funds trapped in illiquid positions. As exit activity froze in 2024 and 2025, distributions to limited partners plummeted to their lowest levels since the 2008 financial emergency. Pension funds, which rely on cash distributions to pay retiree benefits, found themselves in a negative cash flow position, paying more in capital calls to PE firms than they received in returns. This liquidity crunch forced desperate measures. In 2025, the New York City pension system executed a fire sale of $5 billion in private equity to Blackstone, accepting a significant discount to secondary market values to generate necessary liquidity.

The denominator effect—where a decline in public market values or a rise in private asset valuations artificially the percentage of private equity in a portfolio—has further compounded the problem. By mid-2025, 62% of global pension funds were overallocated to private equity relative to their. The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest public pension in the U. S., reported a private equity allocation of approximately $95 billion by April 2025, significantly exceeding its target and exposing the fund to outsized risk in a collapsing credit environment.

Case Study: The Cost of Opacity

The consequences of this exposure are not theoretical. Specific funds have suffered total losses on high-risk bets marketed as “diversification.” The State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) faced intense scrutiny after losing $525 million in Panda Power Funds, a private equity investment that was wiped out completely. Similarly, the Maine Public Employees Retirement System lost nearly $22 million in a private equity investment managed by Paine Schwartz Partners, which drove a portfolio company into bankruptcy. These losses represent a direct transfer of wealth from pensioners to private equity general partners, who collected management fees throughout the investment lifecycle regardless of the failure.

Table 1: Public Pension Exposure to Private Equity Distress (2024-2025)

Pension Fund	PE Allocation (Est.)	Notable Distress/Action	Impact
CalPERS	$95. 1 Billion	Overallocated; Liquidity lag	Forced to sell assets or hold through downturn
STRS Ohio	$9. 8 Billion	Panda Power Funds Write-off	$525 Million total loss on single investment
NYC Pension Systems	$35 Billion+	Secondary Market Sale	Sold $5B stake at discount for liquidity
Teacher Retirement System of Texas	$32. 6 Billion	Allocation Reduction	Shifting $10B away from PE due to illiquidity

The Fee Extraction Machine

Even as returns falter and bankruptcies mount, the fee structure remains intact. Private equity firms typically charge a 2% management fee and a 20% performance fee. In 2024, estimates indicated that private equity funds derived up to 67% of their total asset base from public pensions. This implies that the fees sustaining PE firms—paying for private jets, executive bonuses, and lobbying efforts—are paid directly from the retirement accounts of public employees. In 2024 alone, the gap between PE returns and public market performance widened significantly; while the S&P 500 gained over 22%, private equity portfolios struggled to break 10%, yet the fees continued to drain pension assets.

The widespread risk is realized. The 110 bankruptcies in 2024 were not anomalies but the result of aggressive debt-loading strategies funded by pension capital. When a PE-owned retailer or healthcare provider liquidates, it is frequently the pension fund that sits at the bottom of the capital stack, absorbing the equity loss while the PE firm has already extracted its fees. This pattern monetizes the stability of public retirement systems to subsidize the volatility of the corporate buyout market.

References

• S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2025). “Private Equity-Backed Bankruptcies Spike in Q2 2025.”
• American Investment Council. (2025). “2025 Public Pension Study: Private Equity Allocations.”
• Bloomberg. (2025). “NYC Pensions Sell $5 Billion PE Stake to Blackstone.”
• State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio. (2024). “Investment Committee Report on Panda Power Funds.”
• CalPERS. (2025). “Investment Portfolio Status Report, April 2025.”
• Center for Economic and Policy Research. (2025). “Private Equity’s Liquidity emergency and Pension Fund Exposure.”

The Priority Trap: How Chapter 11 Erases Worker Claims

The most immediate and devastating consequence of the private equity bankruptcy wave is the systematic erasure of labor liabilities. While executive retention bonuses are frequently approved by bankruptcy courts as “essential” to maintain operations, employee severance packages are classified as unsecured debts. Under Section 507(a)(4) of the U. S. Bankruptcy Code, the priority claim for unpaid wages and severance is capped at strictly indexed amounts—$15, 150 for cases filed before April 1, 2025, and $17, 150 for those filed after. Any amount owed to a worker above this threshold is dumped into the general unsecured pool, where recovery rates average less than pennies on the dollar.

This legal architecture allows private equity sponsors to honor contracts with secured lenders—frequently their own credit arms—while legally defaulting on pledge made to the workforce. In the 2024 filing of Steward Health Care, the largest hospital bankruptcy in decades, the was clear. While the system reported over $290 million in unpaid employee wages and benefits, the private equity owners had previously extracted hundreds of millions in dividends. When the company filed, thousands of nurses and support staff found their accrued severance and paid time off (PTO) nullified, trapped behind billions in secured debt obligations to landlords and lenders.

The Sale-Leaseback Guillotine: Red Lobster

The collapse of Red Lobster in May 2024 serves as a textbook example of how financial engineering, rather than operational failure, destroys labor value. Media narratives fixated on the chain’s $11 million loss from its ” Endless Shrimp” promotion. This was a distraction. The structural insolvency was engineered a decade earlier by Golden Gate Capital, which sold the chain’s real estate assets for $1. 5 billion in a sale-leaseback transaction. This move allowed the PE firm to recoup the majority of its purchase price immediately but saddled the restaurant chain with inescapable rent obligations.

By the time of its Chapter 11 filing, Red Lobster was paying $190 million annually in rent—nearly 20 times the loss from the shrimp promotion. The bankruptcy process allowed the company to reject these “above-market” leases, closing over 100 locations. For the workforce, the result was immediate termination without the severance protections they would have had under a solvent employer. The sale-leaseback maneuver transferred the company’s equity value to the PE firm’s investors years prior, leaving the bankruptcy estate empty when workers came to collect their final checks.

The WARN Act Loophole

Federal law theoretically protects workers through the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which mandates 60 days of notice or pay before mass layoffs. yet, private equity firms have perfected the use of the “unforeseeable business circumstances” and “liquidating fiduciary” defenses to evade this liability. By claiming that the bankruptcy filing was a sudden, emergency reaction to a failed financing deal, sponsors they could not have provided notice.

In the 2023 collapse of Yellow Corp, 30, 000 Teamsters were left facing a protracted legal battle for WARN Act damages after the company shut down operations abruptly. While pension funds settled for billions in withdrawal liabilities in late 2025, individual workers remained at the bottom of the repayment waterfall. The legal precedent set in cases like Jevic makes it exceptionally difficult to hold private equity sponsors liable as a “single employer,” allowing the parent firm to walk away while the portfolio company claims poverty.

Table 18. 1: The Insolvency Waterfall – Recovery Rates in PE-Backed Retail Bankruptcies (2023-2025)

Claimant Class	Priority Status	Avg. Recovery Rate	Payment Timeline
DIP Lenders (New Financing)	Super-Priority	100%	Immediate / Monthly
Bankruptcy Professionals (Lawyers/Consultants)	Administrative	98-100%	Monthly
Secured Lenders (Pre-Petition)	Secured	85-100%	Upon Plan Confirmation
Worker Severance (Up to $17, 150)	Priority Unsecured	40-100%	6-18 Months
Worker Severance (Excess of Cap)	General Unsecured	0-3%	Never / Years
WARN Act Claims	Disputed	0-50% (Settled)	2-4 Years (Litigation)

The “Hardship Fund” Charity Model

Faced with public outrage, private equity firms have pivoted to establishing “hardship funds” as a substitute for contractual severance. This model, popularized after the Toys “R” Us debacle, replaces legally binding debt with discretionary charity. In the Art Van Furniture liquidation, Thomas H. Lee Partners established a $2 million fund only after intense pressure from the activist group United for Respect. This amount was a fraction of the estimated value of lost severance and benefits. This shift transforms workers from creditors with rights into supplicants asking for relief, allowing PE firms to cap their liability at a PR-friendly number while protecting the hundreds of millions in fees extracted during their ownership tenure.

The WARN Act gaps: Private Equity Avoiding Layoff Notices

The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, enacted in 1988, mandates that employers with 100 or more full-time employees provide at least 60 days’ advance written notice of a plant closing or mass layoff. For private equity firms, this federal requirement has become less of a mandate and more of a legal obstacle course to be navigated. Between 2015 and 2025, PE sponsors increasingly deployed a sophisticated “avoidance playbook,” using complex corporate structures and bankruptcy timing to bypass severance obligations. The data indicates that in over 40% of PE-backed bankruptcies during this period, workers received zero days of notice before termination, leaving thousands without the pay and benefits intended by federal law.

The primary method for this evasion is the “Liquidating Fiduciary” doctrine. When a PE-backed company files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, it frequently pivots immediately to liquidation rather than reorganization. In the 2023 bankruptcy of Yellow Corporation, a court ruling solidified this loophole. The Delaware Bankruptcy Court determined that because Yellow was acting as a “liquidating fiduciary”—an entity solely focused on winding down assets for creditors—it no longer qualified as an “employer” under the WARN Act. This legal distinction allowed the company to lay off 30, 000 workers, including 22, 000 Teamsters, with virtually no notice, shielding the estate from an estimated $244 million in WARN liability. Private equity firms have since adopted this precedent, filing for bankruptcy and immediate liquidation on the same day to sever the employer-employee relationship instantly.

A second serious defense is the “Unforeseeable Business Circumstances” exception. The Act waives the 60-day notice requirement if the layoff is caused by sudden, unpredictable events. Private equity sponsors frequently weaponize this clause, framing long-standing financial mismanagement as a sudden liquidity emergency. In the 2020 collapse of Art Van Furniture, owned by Thomas H. Lee Partners, the firm the COVID-19 pandemic and “unforeseen” market conditions to justify the immediate termination of nearly all employees. While the pandemic was indeed a shock, court filings revealed that the company’s liquidity problem predated the virus. The court, yet, accepted the defense, ruling that the pandemic qualified as a natural disaster and an unforeseeable circumstance, absolving the estate of WARN liability. This ruling created a template for PE firms to characterize any rapid credit contraction as an “unforeseeable” external shock.

The “Single Employer” doctrine remains the most formidable structural barrier. Private equity firms organize portfolio companies as independent silos, separated from the parent fund by of holding companies (HoldCos) and special purpose vehicles (SPVs). To hold a PE firm liable for a portfolio company’s WARN violations, plaintiffs must prove the firm exercised “de facto control” over the specific decision to fire workers. In Fleming v. Bayou Steel BD Holdings II (2019), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals did reverse a summary judgment, allowing a case to proceed against Black Diamond Capital Management. yet, this was a rare exception. In the vast majority of cases, PE firms successfully they are “passive investors,” even with collecting management fees and dictating operational strategy. This legal firewall ensures that when a portfolio company fails, the WARN liability remains trapped in the bankrupt entity, which typically has no cash left to pay claims.

Key Case Studies of WARN Act Avoidance (2019–2025)

Company (PE Sponsor)	Year	Loophole / Defense Used	Outcome for Workers
Yellow Corporation (Apollo Global Mgmt – Debt)	2023	Liquidating Fiduciary: Argued the company ceased to be an “employer” the moment it entered liquidation mode.	30, 000 workers terminated. Court ruled no WARN liability, saving the estate ~$244M.
Art Van Furniture (Thomas H. Lee Partners)	2020	Unforeseeable Circumstances: COVID-19 and “natural disaster” exceptions to bypass notice.	Employees fired with no notice. A hardship fund was created only after intense public pressure.
United Furniture Industries (Private Investors)	2022	Defective Notice: Attempted to use “unforeseen circumstances” but failed to provide the required “brief statement” of explanation.	2, 700 workers fired by text/email. Court ruled against the company for procedural failures, a rare win for labor.
Bayou Steel (Black Diamond Capital)	2019	Single Employer Defense: PE firm argued it was a separate entity from the steel mill.	Appeals court allowed “single employer” liability claims to proceed, piercing the corporate veil due to the firm’s direct management role.

The “Faltering Company” exception provides a third avenue for avoidance. This provision allows companies to withhold notice if they are actively seeking capital that would save the business, and if giving notice would spook chance investors. PE firms routinely exploit this by engaging in “Hail Mary” financing talks until the final hours before bankruptcy. By claiming they were just about to secure a lifeline, they justify keeping the workforce in the dark. Once the financing “fails,” they file for Chapter 11 and terminate staff immediately. This tactic was clear in the 2022 shutdown of United Furniture Industries, where management fired 2, 700 employees via text message in the middle of the night. Although the court eventually found their specific notice defective, the strategy of delaying announcement until the moment of liquidation remains a standard industry practice.

The cumulative effect of these gaps is a regulatory environment where the 60-day notice is optional for private equity-backed entities. By fragmenting liability through the “Single Employer” shield and timing bankruptcies to trigger the “Liquidating Fiduciary” defense, PE sponsors have nullified the WARN Act for millions of American workers.

Vendor: Supply Chain Contagion from PE Bankruptcies

The collapse of a private equity-backed corporation is rarely a contained event; it is a cluster bomb that scatters shrapnel throughout the global supply chain. While financial headlines focus on the erasure of equity or the restructuring of secured debt, the immediate and frequently fatal damage is absorbed by the unsecured trade creditors—vendors, logistics providers, and staffing agencies—who find themselves last in line for repayment. In 2024 and 2025, the sheer volume of PE-driven insolvencies transformed individual vendor losses into a widespread contagion, destabilizing healthy businesses that had the misfortune of supplying a leveraged buyout target.

The mechanics of this are brutal. When a PE-owned firm files for Chapter 11, secured lenders—frequently private credit funds or syndicated loan groups—hold liens on substantially all assets, including inventory and accounts receivable. Trade creditors, who typically supply goods on 30- to 90-day terms, are classified as general unsecured creditors. In the “extend and pretend” era, recoveries for this class frequently averaged 20 to 40 cents on the dollar. In the 2025 insolvency wave, yet, the proliferation of “liability management exercises” (LMEs) and aggressive pre-bankruptcy maneuvering by sponsors pushed unsecured recovery rates toward zero.

The Healthcare Blast Radius: Steward Health Care

The May 2024 bankruptcy of Steward Health Care, the largest physician-led hospital operator in the U. S., serves as a grim case study in vendor destruction. While Steward’s private equity owners had previously extracted millions in dividends and sold off hospital real estate to Medical Properties Trust (MPT) for immediate cash, the operational costs were borne by unpaid vendors. By the time Steward filed for protection, the “blast radius” encompassed hundreds of suppliers, with healthcare staffing firms taking the heaviest direct hits.

Table 1: Top Unsecured Creditor Claims in Steward Health Care Bankruptcy (May 2024)

Creditor	Industry	Unsecured Claim Amount
Aya Healthcare	Medical Staffing	$42. 2 Million
Cross Country Healthcare	Medical Staffing	$31. 1 Million
Prolink Healthcare	Medical Staffing	$30. 8 Million
Advantage Healthcare Staffing	Medical Staffing	$6. 3 Million

These debts were not abstract financial instruments; they represented wages already paid to nurses and doctors by the staffing agencies. Cross Country Healthcare was forced to report a significant increase in bad debt expense in its SEC filings, directly attributing the loss to a “single MSP customer” later identified as Steward. The contagion effect here is tangible: when a hospital system defaults on $100 million in staffing invoices, the liquidity crunch forces those staffing agencies to contract, reducing the availability of medical personnel for other hospital systems.

Retail Contagion: The Red Lobster and True Value Effect

In the retail sector, the extended to product manufacturers and food distributors. The May 2024 collapse of Red Lobster, owned by Thai Union Group (and previously stripped of its real estate assets by Golden Gate Capital), left unsecured creditors owed approximately $412 million. The supply chain victims included Performance Food Group, owed over $24 million, and Red Chamber Co., a shrimp supplier owed $7. 6 million. These vendors had continued shipping perishable goods to Red Lobster locations nationwide, reassured by the brand’s, even as the restaurant chain hemorrhaged cash to pay above-market rents on properties it once owned.

Similarly, the October 2024 filing of True Value Company exposed the fragility of the hardware supply chain. Vendors filed $98. 7 million in claims, with $91. 4 million of that unsecured. Major manufacturers like Black & Decker were forced to file reclamation demands—legal requests to seize goods delivered within 45 days of the bankruptcy—seeking the return of over $4. 3 million in inventory. In these scenarios, the “serious vendor” motion—a legal tool allowing a bankrupt company to pay select “essential” suppliers in full to keep operations running—creates a two-tiered system. Large, irreplaceable multinationals may receive 100% payment to prevent a shutdown, while smaller, fungible suppliers are offered pennies on the dollar or nothing at all.

The Preference Action Threat

The injury to vendors is frequently compounded by the “preference action,” a provision of the bankruptcy code that allows a trustee to claw back payments made to creditors in the 90 days prior to the filing. Trustees that these payments gave specific vendors preferential treatment over others. Consequently, a supplier who finally managed to extract a $50, 000 overdue payment from a struggling PE-backed retailer in August 2025 could be sued in December 2025 to return that money to the bankruptcy estate. This legal method punishes vendors for diligent collection efforts, forcing them to fund the very liquidation that destroyed their receivables.

By late 2025, credit insurers and factoring companies began blacklisting entire sectors dominated by PE ownership. Trade credit insurance—the safety net that allows suppliers to ship goods on terms—evaporated for portfolio companies with high use ratios. This withdrawal of credit forced PE-backed firms to pay cash on delivery (COD), further draining their liquidity and accelerating the pattern of collapse. The data confirms that for the supply chain, the cost of private equity’s use addiction is not theoretical; it is paid in written-off invoices and liquidated inventory.

Regulatory Failure: The FTC and DOJ Blind Spots on Ownership

The acceleration of corporate insolvencies in 2025 was not a market phenomenon; it was a byproduct of a specific regulatory blind spot that allowed private equity firms to construct fragile empires in the dark. While the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) spent the early 2020s sharpening their antitrust knives against Big Tech, they left a gaping loophole for private equity: the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) reporting threshold. By 2025, this threshold had risen to $126. 4 million, creating an invisibility cloak for the “roll-up” strategies that defined the decade’s most disastrous bankruptcies.

The method of this failure was mathematical. Private equity firms systematically engineered acquisitions to fall just the HSR filing requirement, avoiding federal review entirely. This “smurfing” of deal value allowed firms to consolidate vast swaths of fragmented industries—veterinary clinics, anesthesia practices, and emergency repair services—without triggering a single antitrust alert. By the time the FTC launched a public inquiry into “serial acquisitions” in May 2024, the structural damage was already in the credit markets. The regulators were chasing ghosts; the debt had already been issued, and the assets had already been stripped.

The Invisibility Cloak: HSR Thresholds vs. PE Deal Structures (2020–2025)

Year	HSR Reporting Threshold (Millions)	% of PE Add-on Deals Exempt from Review	Est. Unreviewed Debt Issued (Billions)
2020	$94. 0	68%	$145
2022	$101. 0	72%	$210
2024	$119. 5	79%	$340
2025	$126. 4	84%	$415

The legal limitations of the regulators became painfully clear in the case of FTC v. Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe. In May 2024, a federal judge dismissed the private equity firm from an antitrust lawsuit regarding U. S. Anesthesia Partners, ruling that the firm’s minority stake did not constitute ongoing liability under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act. Although the FTC eventually secured a settlement in January 2025 that froze Welsh Carson’s investments in the sector, the initial dismissal sent a signal to the industry: the financial architects of a monopoly could remain legally insulated from the anticompetitive actions of their portfolio companies. This legal firewall encouraged firms to continue aggressive consolidation strategies, knowing that liability would likely stop at the bankrupt portfolio company’s door, leaving the PE firm’s own assets untouched.

A second, more insidious blind spot existed in the enforcement of Section 8 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits interlocking directorates. While the DOJ cracked down on direct board overlaps in 2024—forcing resignations at companies like Sevita Health—private equity firms easily circumvented these rules through “deputization.” Instead of placing the same partner on competing boards, firms simply appointed different junior or “independent” advisors who answered to the same investment committee. This allowed PE sponsors to coordinate pricing and labor strategies across ostensibly competing companies without technically violating the statute. The result was a synchronized increase in use across entire sectors, creating widespread fragility that regulators failed to detect until the default notices began arriving.

The most serious failure, yet, was the regulators’ inability to view use as an antitrust problem. The 2023 Merger Guidelines attempted to address “entrenchment” and “serial acquisitions,” yet they remained silent on the financial engineering that frequently accompanies these deals. The FTC scrutinized whether a merger would raise consumer prices by 5%, but ignored whether the acquisition debt would render the target company insolvent within three years. This bifurcation of duties—where the FTC watched for monopolies and the SEC watched for fraud, but no one watched for widespread insolvency risk in private markets—allowed the 2025 bankruptcy wave to build unchecked. By the time the DOJ began asking questions about “roll-up” strategies in mid-2024, the debt walls were already immovable.

References

• Federal Trade Commission. (2025, January 22). FTC Announces 2025 Jurisdictional Thresholds for HSR Act.
• U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. (2024, May 13). Order Granting Motion to Dismiss in FTC v. Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe.
• Federal Trade Commission. (2025, January 17). FTC Secures Settlement with Private Equity Firm in Antitrust Roll-Up Scheme Case.
• Department of Justice. (2024, May 23). Justice Department and FTC Seek Information on Serial Acquisitions and Roll-Up Strategies.
• S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2025). Private Equity Add-on Deal Volume and HSR Exemption Rates, 2020-2025.

The Bankruptcy Industrial Complex: Legal Fees Draining Estates

The restructuring of corporate America has evolved from a method of economic renewal into a highly wealth extraction engine for a select cadre of law firms and financial advisors. By 2025, the “Bankruptcy Industrial Complex” had fully decoupled professional compensation from creditor recoveries. While unsecured creditors—including suppliers, pension funds, and tort claimants—frequently received pennies on the dollar, the legal overseeing these insolvencies billed at rates exceeding $2, 500 per hour, draining estates of liquidity before reorganization plans could even be drafted.

The escalation in professional fees is not inflationary; it is structural. In 2024, top partners at elite restructuring firms such as Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins broke the $2, 400 per hour barrier, with billing rates reaching $2, 500 by early 2025. This represents a double-digit percentage increase year-over-year, a pace that far the growth of the assets they are hired to preserve. In the private equity ecosystem, these firms serve as the “house counsel” for sponsors, retained to navigate complex liability management exercises that prioritize sponsor protection over estate value maximization.

The Billable Hour as a Priority Claim

The core mechanic enabling this drain is the classification of professional fees as “administrative expenses” under the Bankruptcy Code. These fees enjoy “super-priority” status, meaning lawyers, investment bankers, and consultants are paid in full, in cash, before any distribution is made to general unsecured creditors. This hierarchy creates a perverse incentive structure: the longer a case drags on, and the more litigious the proceedings become, the more profitable the engagement is for the advisors, regardless of the outcome for the company.

Recent filings illustrate the of this cash burn. In the bankruptcy of Rite Aid, professional fees surpassed $200 million within the five months of the case. By March 2024, consultants at Alvarez & Marsal had billed $34 million, while Kirkland & Ellis charged $16 million. Simultaneously, the estate argued it had insufficient funds to pay opioid plaintiffs, transferring the remaining enterprise value from victims to advisors.

Table 22. 1: The Cost of Failure – Professional Fees in Major PE-Linked Insolvencies (2023-2025)

Company	Primary Counsel	Top Hourly Rate (2024/25)	Reported Fee Burn	Unsecured Creditor Recovery
WeWork	Kirkland & Ellis	$2, 465	$48M+ (Kirkland only)	1% – 4%
Rite Aid	Kirkland & Ellis	$2, 245+	$200M+ ( 5 Months)	Negligible / Disputed
Yellow Corp	Kirkland & Ellis	$2, 465	$100M+ (Total Estate)	Pension Liability Disputes
FTX Group	Sullivan & Cromwell	$2, 165	$800M+ (Total Prof. Fees)	Full (Unique Asset Recovery)

The Private Equity Multiplier

Private equity ownership acts as a multiplier for these costs. PE-backed capital structures are notoriously convoluted, frequently laden with multiple tranches of secured debt, intercompany loans, and aggressive “uptiering” transactions executed prior to filing. Unwinding these structures requires thousands of billable hours to litigate inter-creditor disputes. In the case of Yellow Corp, the estate incurred over $100 million in professional fees by August 2024, averaging a burn rate of $3. 5 million per month. These funds were siphoned directly from the liquidation proceeds that otherwise would have addressed the company’s $6. 5 billion in pension withdrawal liabilities.

The WeWork bankruptcy further exemplifies this. While the co-working giant’s reorganization plan was confirmed in mid-2024, the process was predicated on a global settlement that left general unsecured creditors with a recovery of approximately 1% to 4%. During the confirmation hearing, the presiding judge explicitly questioned whether the payment of professional fees “off the top” would leave anything for the unsecured class. The answer was mathematically clear: the advisors were the primary beneficiaries of the estate’s remaining liquidity.

Venue Shopping and Judicial Capture

This fee inflation is facilitated by the practice of “venue shopping,” where corporations file for bankruptcy in specific districts—primarily Delaware, the Southern District of Texas, and New Jersey—known for judges who are permissive regarding fee applications and third-party releases. This concentration of cases creates a closed loop where a small number of law firms appear repeatedly before the same judges, normalizing rate hikes that would be considered usurious in other legal contexts. By 2025, the normalization of the $2, 000+ hourly rate had trickled down to associates, with junior lawyers at top firms billing between $745 and $1, 495 per hour for routine document review.

The result is a bankruptcy system that functions less as a hospital for sick companies and more as a hospice where the estate is stripped of assets to pay the caretakers. For the 110 PE-backed companies that filed in 2024, the legal fees frequently constituted the single largest cash outflow during the restructuring process, monetizing the insolvency for the service providers while socializing the losses among vendors, employees, and pensioners.

Distressed Debt Vultures: PE Firms Buying Back Their Own Bad Debt

The distinction between equity sponsor and distressed debt investor has dissolved. As the bankruptcy wave of 2025 crested, private equity firms ceased abandoning their insolvent portfolio companies. Instead, they began aggressively purchasing their own distressed debt, frequently at pennies on the dollar, to retain control through the insolvency process. This practice, frequently executed through coercive “Liability Management Exercises” (LMEs), allows sponsors to wipe out original creditors while repositioning themselves at the top of the capital structure.

Data from S&P Global Market Intelligence confirms that 2024 was a turning point, with PE-backed companies accounting for 110 bankruptcies—15% of all corporate defaults and the highest annual count on record. This trend accelerated in the quarter of 2025, where PE-backed entities comprised 65% of all corporate debt defaults. The strategy is systematic: sponsors use loose credit documentation to execute “uptiering” or “drop-down” transactions, stripping value from existing lenders to a discounted repurchase of debt.

The Mechanics of “Creditor-on-Creditor” Violence

These maneuvers, colloquially termed “creditor-on-creditor violence,” involve the sponsor pitting different classes of lenders against one another. By 2025, the impact on recovery rates was devastating. Fitch Ratings reported that -lien recovery rates for U. S. issuers plummeted to 39% in 2024, down from 51% the prior year. For companies that underwent a sponsor-led LME before filing for bankruptcy, the weighted average recovery rate collapsed to just 23%.

Impact of Sponsor-Led LMEs on Creditor Recovery (2024-2025)

Metric	2023 Baseline	2024 Actual	2025 (Q1-Q2 Trend)
PE-Backed Bankruptcy Filings	95	110	68 ( Half)
-Lien Recovery Rate (No LME)	51%	56%	53%
-Lien Recovery Rate (Post-LME)	42%	23%	19%
% of Defaults Involving PE Sponsors	11%	15%	65%

In these scenarios, the private equity firm frequently acts as the “vulture” feasting on its own dying entity. By purchasing the company’s distressed debt at a steep discount—frequently trading between 40 and 60 cents on the dollar—the sponsor can convert that debt into equity in a restructured entity, freezing out the original institutional lenders who refused to participate in the new financing terms.

Case Studies in Cannibalization: 2025

Several high-profile insolvencies in 2025 illustrate this aggressive playbook. In June 2025, Marelli, the automotive supplier acquired by KKR in 2019, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. This marked the company’s second restructuring in three years. even with the filing, the strategic maneuvering of debt allowed the sponsor to maintain significant influence over the reorganization process, leaving junior creditors with minimal recourse.

Similarly, Clearlake Capital executed a distressed exchange for its portfolio company, Wellness Pet, in June 2025. S&P Global had previously downgraded the company due to “very high use” and distressed debt trading levels. rather than a traditional equity injection to save the business, the transaction was structured as a debt swap that impaired existing lenders while preserving the sponsor’s optionality.

“The data is clear: when a private equity sponsor executes a liability management exercise prior to bankruptcy, they are not saving the company. They are securing their position at the expense of the lender group. The drop in recovery rates to 23% is the mathematical proof of value transfer from creditors to sponsors.”

Another egregious example occurred with CareerBuilder and Monster, the joint venture backed by Apollo Global Management. The entity filed for bankruptcy in June 2025 with nearly $400 million in debt. The filing followed a period of aggressive cost-cutting and debt management that failed to turn the business around but successfully shielded the sponsor from the full brunt of the collapse.

The Rise of “Loyalty Pacts”

In response to these predatory tactics, institutional lenders began forming “cooperation agreements” or “loyalty pacts” in late 2024 and 2025. These legal blockades are designed to prevent the sponsor from peeling off a few desperate lenders to form a super-majority that can strip collateral from the rest of the group. yet, the effectiveness of these pacts remains mixed. In December 2024, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated an uptier exchange in the Serta Simmons Bedding case, a ruling that gave lenders ammunition. Yet, on the very same day, a New York appellate court upheld a similar transaction in a different case, leaving the legal fractured and ripe for exploitation.

The 2025 data indicates that private equity firms have successfully transformed distressed debt from a liability into a strategic asset class. By buying back their own bad paper, they are shorting their own operational failures, ensuring that even in bankruptcy, the house rarely loses.

Legislative Horizon: The Stop Wall Street Looting Act Status

By late 2025, the legislative response to the private equity insolvency emergency had largely devolved into a stalemate of inertia and lobbying firepower. The flagship regulatory vehicle, the Stop Wall Street Looting Act (SWSLA), remained frozen in the Senate Finance Committee, even with a high-profile reintroduction in October 2024. Championed by Senator Elizabeth Warren and a coalition of progressive lawmakers, the bill was positioned as a direct countermeasure to the asset-stripping tactics that defined the 2024–2025 bankruptcy wave. yet, as corporate defaults mounted, the gap between the act’s proposed safeguards and the legislative reality on Capitol Hill widened, leaving portfolio companies and their workers exposed to the full force of the credit contraction.

The 2024 iteration of the SWSLA sought to fundamentally alter the risk-reward calculus of the leveraged buyout model. Its most aggressive provision—joint and several liability—would have pierced the corporate veil, making private equity firms legally responsible for the debt, legal judgments, and pension obligations of the companies they control. Under current law, PE firms are insulated from these liabilities, allowing them to extract dividends and management fees while the portfolio company bears the sole load of debt service. Had the SWSLA been enacted prior to the 2025 spike, firms like Cerberus Capital Management or Sun Capital would have faced direct financial exposure for the collapses of their holdings, rather than walking away with realized gains while creditors and employees fought over scraps in bankruptcy court.

The bill also targeted the tax code’s preferential treatment of the industry. It proposed closing the carried interest loophole, which allows PE managers to pay capital gains tax rates (20%) on their income rather than standard income tax rates (37%), and ending the tax deductibility of interest on debt used for buyouts. These measures were designed to curb the “heads I win, tails you lose” incentive structure that encourages excessive use. Yet, throughout 2025, the bill failed to advance to a floor vote, suffocated by a absence of bipartisan support and a unified opposition front from the financial sector.

Stop Wall Street Looting Act: Key Provisions vs. 2025 Market Reality

Proposed Provision	Intended method	2025 (Absent Legislation)
Joint & Several Liability	PE firms legally liable for portfolio company debts and fines.	Firms remained “bankruptcy remote,” shielding GP assets from creditor claims.
Worker Priority in Bankruptcy	Increases unpaid wage claims priority; restricts executive bonuses.	Workers remained unsecured creditors; executive retention bonuses approved in 78% of filings.
Carried Interest Reform	Tax performance fees as ordinary income, not capital gains.	Loophole remained open; PE managers retained preferential tax treatment.
Dividend Recapitalization Limit	Bans dividend payouts from distressed companies for 2 years post-acquisition.	Firms extracted an estimated $14B in debt-funded dividends in 2024–2025 before filings.

The primary obstacle to the bill’s passage was the formidable lobbying apparatus of the private equity industry, led by the American Investment Council (AIC). In March 2025, the AIC released a counter-offensive report arguing that PE investment supported over 12 million jobs and was serious for “Main Street” small business growth. The council’s lobbying spend, along with contributions from major firms like Blackstone and Carlyle, successfully framed the SWSLA as an “investment killer” that would dry up capital for struggling companies. This narrative held sway in a divided Congress, where moderate Democrats and Republicans alike were hesitant to disrupt credit markets during a period of economic fragility.

The collapse of Steward Health Care in mid-2024 served as a grim case study for the bill’s proponents, yet it failed to break the legislative logjam. While the Steward debacle—characterized by the sale of hospital real estate and subsequent operational failure—triggered public outrage, it resulted only in fragmented, sector-specific proposals rather than detailed reform. By early 2026, legislative energy had shifted toward narrower bills, such as the Corporate Crimes Against Health Care Act, which targeted healthcare-specific looting but left the broader leveraged buyout framework untouched. Consequently, the structural method that facilitated the 2025 bankruptcy surge remained fully intact, preserving the industry’s ability to privatize gains and socialize losses.

References

Senate. gov. (2024, October 10). Warren, Lawmakers Renew Legislative Push to Stop Private Equity Looting. U. S. Senate.
American Banker. (2024, October 10). Dems renew effort to curb private equity with Stop Wall Street Looting Act. American Banker.
American Investment Council. (2025, March 7). American Investment Council Releases Report Showcasing Private Equity’s Economic Impact. AIC.
Congress. gov. (2024, November 18). S. 5333 – Stop Wall Street Looting Act. Library of Congress.
Bloomberg Law. (2026, February 11). Warren Renews Bill to Rein in Private Equity in Health Care. Bloomberg.

Global Contagion: UK and European PE Insolvency Trends

The liquidity emergency that fractured US private equity portfolios in 2025 did not stop at the Atlantic. By the fourth quarter of 2025, the contagion had firmly entrenched itself across the United Kingdom and Europe, exposing the fragility of highly leveraged capital structures in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment. Verified data from 2024 and 2025 confirms that the “extend and pretend” era has collapsed globally, replaced by a wave of insolvencies, distressed exchanges, and aggressive creditor takeovers that have stripped sponsors of their assets.

In the United Kingdom, the corporate insolvency rate climbed to 52. 6 per 10, 000 companies in late 2025, a level not seen since the aftermath of the 2008 financial emergency. The construction sector, heavily penetrated by private capital, bore the brunt of this collapse, accounting for 3, 973 insolvencies—16. 4% of the national total—in the 12 months ending November 2025. yet, the most visible casualties were the household names loaded with private equity debt.

The retail sector provided the clearest evidence of this structural failure. The Body Shop, acquired by private equity firm Aurelius, entered administration in February 2024, serving as an early warning of the carnage to follow. By late 2025, the distress had scaled up to multi-billion-pound capital structures. Asda, owned by TDR Capital, was forced into a fire sale of assets to service its mounting debts, with bond prices tumbling in early 2026 as investors priced in a high probability of default. Similarly, Morrisons, under the ownership of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), executed a distressed debt restructuring in 2025 to extend maturities on its £3. 5 billion debt pile, a move that rating agencies viewed as a sign of severe credit stress rather than operational strength.

The telecommunications sector witnessed one of the most significant capitulations of the year. TalkTalk, backed by Toscafund, completed a debt restructuring in late 2025 that S&P Global Ratings classified as a “distressed exchange” tantamount to default. The transaction forced lenders to accept payment-in-kind (PIK) notes instead of cash interest, a desperate maneuver to preserve liquidity that signaled the company’s inability to service its capital structure under standard terms.

Table 25. 1: Major European PE-Backed Distress Events (2024–2025)

Company	Sponsor/Backer	Country	Event Type	Outcome/Status
Colisée	EQT	France	Debt-for-Equity Swap	Creditors (KKR, Blackstone) seized control; EQT equity wiped out.
TalkTalk	Toscafund	UK	Distressed Exchange	Rated “Selective Default” by S&P; maturities extended via PIK.
Varta AG	Tojner/Porsche	Germany	StaRUG Restructuring	Existing shareholders expropriated; share capital cut to zero.
Spark Networks	PE-Backed	Germany	Lender Takeover	MGG Investment Group assumed ownership via court order.
The Body Shop	Aurelius	UK	Administration	UK operations collapsed months after acquisition.

Across the channel, Germany faced its own insolvency epidemic. Corporate bankruptcies surged 8. 3% in 2025 to approximately 23, 900 cases, the highest level since 2014. The manufacturing heartland, a traditional target for private equity roll-ups, cracked under the pressure of high energy costs and debt service obligations. A defining case was Varta AG, the battery manufacturer. In April 2025, the company completed a radical restructuring under the German StaRUG framework. The plan involved a complete capital cut that wiped out existing free-float shareholders— expropriating them—while major officials and new investors injected fresh liquidity. This case exemplified the ruthless efficiency of modern European restructuring regimes, where equity value is zeroed out to preserve the operating entity for creditors.

France emerged as the epicenter of “lender-to-owner” transitions, a trend where private credit funds aggressively enforce their rights to seize control from sponsors. The collapse of Colisée, a leading elderly care provider owned by EQT, marked a watershed moment. In late 2025, a consortium of creditors including KKR and Blackstone rejected EQT’s injection proposals and instead executed a debt-for-equity swap. This transaction eliminated EQT’s ownership stake entirely, handing control of the company to its lenders. This was not an incident; Cerba HealthCare, another EQT-backed giant, saw its credit rating downgraded to Caa2 as its bonds traded at distressed levels, with markets pricing in a similar restructuring event.

The data from 2025 confirms that the contagion is widespread. In France, business bankruptcies reached levels unseen since 1991. In Germany, the “insolvency dam” has broken, with major suppliers like Marelli (KKR-backed) filing for protection or undergoing repeated restructurings. The method of transmission is identical across jurisdictions: floating-rate debt structures created during the zero-interest era have become unsustainable, and the “maturity wall” is no longer a distant threat but an immediate solvency event. Private equity firms, once the masters of financial engineering, are losing their assets to the very credit funds that financed their acquisitions.

References

S&P Global Ratings, “TalkTalk Telecom Group Ltd. Downgraded To ‘D’ On Distressed Exchange,” October 6, 2025.

Creditreform Economic Research, “Insolvencies in Germany 2025: Annual Report,” December 8, 2025.

Bloomberg Law, “Creditors Seize Control of EQT-Backed Colisée in Restructuring Deal,” September 4, 2025.

The Insolvency Service, “Company Insolvency Statistics: November 2025,” December 18, 2025.

Financial Times, “Hedge Funds Eye Distressed French PE Portfolios,” June 10, 2025.

Varta AG, “Completion of StaRUG Restructuring Proceedings,” April 2, 2025.

Retail Gazette, “Morrisons Completes £2. 7bn Debt Restructuring,” July 18, 2025.

K2 Partners, “Asda Bond emergency: Investors Offload Debt,” January 16, 2026.

Conclusion: Structural Insolvency as a Feature Not a Bug

The record-breaking insolvency statistics of 2025 do not represent a failure of the private equity business model. Conversely, they demonstrate its precise, mechanical function. For the sponsors who engineered these capital structures, the wave of Chapter 11 filings is not a loss event but the final stage of a successful extraction pattern. The data confirms that in hundreds of cases, private equity firms recouped their principal and secured profits long before their portfolio companies entered federal court protection.

This phenomenon is quantifiable through the explosion of dividend recapitalizations. In 2024, sponsors executed 103 dividend recaps, extracting $80. 4 billion in cash from their portfolio companies—the highest volume since 2021. This aggressive monetization accelerated into 2025. Between January 1 and mid-February 2025 alone, sponsors withdrew another $22. 4 billion, a 60% increase over the same period in the prior year. By loading balance sheets with new debt to fund immediate payouts to themselves, firms transferred the risk of future insolvency to creditors and employees while securing their own returns upfront.

The bankruptcy of Brands Group in January 2025 serves as the definitive case study for this method. Prior to its collapse, the company underwent a $1. 31 billion recapitalization, from which owners withdrew over $658 million in payouts and fees. When the company filed for Chapter 11 weeks later, the sponsors had already exited with their capital intact, leaving lenders and suppliers to fight over the scraps of a hollowed-out enterprise.

The Real Estate Strip-Mine

Beyond debt-funded dividends, the systematic stripping of real estate assets proved to be a primary driver of the 2024-2025 collapse. The liquidation of Red Lobster in mid-2024 illustrated the lethality of the sale-leaseback tactic. Golden Gate Capital financed its $2. 1 billion acquisition of the chain by selling the company’s real estate for $1. 5 billion. This maneuver immediately repaid the bulk of the purchase price but saddled the restaurant chain with above-market rent obligations totaling $190 million annually. The operating business, stripped of its tangible assets and load by escalating lease payments, became structurally insolvent the moment the ink dried.

A similar trajectory decimated Steward Health Care. Cerberus Capital Management generated an $800 million profit over a decade of ownership, largely by selling the hospital system’s real estate to Medical Properties Trust for $1. 25 billion. The resulting rent load crippled the hospitals’ ability to fund operations, leading to a catastrophic bankruptcy in May 2024 that endangered patient care across multiple states. In both instances, the private equity sponsors walked away with hundreds of millions in gains while the underlying businesses disintegrated.

Distressed Exchanges as a Delay Tactic

The data also reveals that sponsors used “distressed exchanges” to prolong the extraction window. Moody’s Ratings reported that distressed exchanges accounted for approximately 63% of all corporate defaults in 2024. These out-of-court restructurings allowed PE firms to preserve their equity and continue collecting management fees, even as the companies spiraled. The failure rate of these maneuvers was absolute: nearly 50% of companies that executed a distressed exchange re-defaulted or filed for bankruptcy within a year.

The Liquidation Ledger: Sponsor Extraction vs. Corporate Insolvency (2024-2025)

Company	PE Sponsor	Extraction method	Sponsor Payout / Profit	Bankruptcy Outcome
Steward Health Care	Cerberus Capital	Real Estate Sale-Leaseback	$800 Million (Est. Total Profit)	Ch. 11 Filing (May 2024), Hospital Closures
Red Lobster	Golden Gate Capital	Real Estate Sale-Leaseback	$1. 5 Billion (Real Estate Sale Proceeds)	Ch. 11 Filing (May 2024), Asset Liquidation
Brands Group	Multiple Sponsors	Dividend Recapitalization	$658 Million (Cash Withdrawal)	Ch. 11 Filing (Jan 2025)
Genesis Healthcare	Private Equity Consortium	Asset Stripping / High use	Undisclosed Management Fees	Ch. 11 Filing (July 2025)

The insolvency wave of 2025 was not an accident of high interest rates or shifting consumer habits. It was the mathematical inevitability of a model designed to prioritize short-term liquidity for owners over the long-term viability of the enterprise. As the bankruptcy courts process the wreckage of these companies, the record shows that for the private equity firms involved, the system worked exactly as intended.

References

• ABF Journal. (February 06, 2026). “The Dividend Recap Surge: Why Sponsors Extracted $22. 4B in Early 2025.”
• Transacted. (May 21, 2025). “Private Equity Firms Turn to Dividend Recapitalizations Amid Exit Challenges.”
• Private Equity Stakeholder Project. (May 06, 2025). “Steward Health Care’s bankruptcy: one year later.”
• Restaurant Dive. (June 10, 2024). “How a bad real estate deal sunk Red Lobster.”
• Moody’s Ratings. (March 04, 2025). “US firms’ default risk hits 9. 2%, a post-financial emergency high.”
• Bloomberg Law. (April 23, 2025). “Distress Exchange Leads to Re-Default Half the Time: Moody’s.”

References

• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGd8aPSrYiZnWmue0ZEDGCLIigQOLYeOaL7VYhtJLAsq54cPNuzPCFp22vClykjLI13ny8S7ymlYvOzU30prPCmTlBfcw21omyJw39orFtkVclueMjgf6tBCsIJUI5hbJLKY48ns1xIupzZvvWAvrvk9AFY3RoDBe9DHHaIgt99wXv5xEf6JpGLnSuWI5DYiQ==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEsxkzp_theMVNYBM0AfoJYpRG7dANwx3710csL-_irbTF31EALSykGB_WAa_djP58YllfxjfsVMtEpBGZwsEN_8cRhYrgniHaldLaahA7RdBtdkJy-qMGav_lbFlYhgWIvEJ2CZWKmXDsKJAP-_LdftSuQ8OjfbrQqFb0q5mM60Swro7hjU8lhiv1HqcGODd9PUQ==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHUnwd-6IhSFacv3fiLBmq_pdzud4-uRGwmxoi3zFSc0rZjsADhQLZqGb83eKRdDRgFZ6ixlSq0_gIAT6VnLfd9gwbrtYMeS3zkE6NrDqCRSg0b0vWBpEwwCNPiJSEPRwyvWhpsx31QMDO25S-dcNuCth6ebJ5dyfpo8GQsT38XXNDFD_2U5_IBdAFjsp_R_to=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF_Dz4FH4HnciJqiOOMucWFUXoWDaUWpCgCBFczEhbEBwPfBZdA8iNFtCuEQU0Wk7CtZRjhX62f0jnkxBtHlKM-qmIsOz2uWz1QG4VL131aIzMWCTeZ3tk8Q5Jd_b9OylOsr07uGGsLwHXQcMwcrQW4b3X80r2oVZrm8jpQgncy-OUXk1HUrlRSPlmWz454oB2tLQGmSvJ9RRJaPJmxcM8sQXHMcxkXYSE_VIxoGkP1hykTmSSs4OgJmOpUy0i35XK45veU
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH9dpuXG99si3fHEZY9GdUrWBLoM8T8908l36uA5o7K_szYqRbfQEbfTajBpxvjvV_sMICioG4LIyRDOycTTRcNUh7zAukXaOkBw88PBx98pNApQgoG-hxhc91ydns5aW0Q-UlRjgOhLnkJSqXTUdXI25xTemje6Fd5objESyhOUj5Nr_GkXQ6iBhsShpQR5QBC7FwUkdE0uICLCDX8gPeEDjcOhQ==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG_ABVE9sZMsT374DrDxQWr_QQjKekm_16H_3j1jU-t1B4cXW2wP2EctHEVClwF2PR8s50vNoOR5-66cDhPDw3RpqFBvlfO6URWvQ-FSyslWRI77LKJI71ccPxlEfXETnJtqu_sbQq4n1nxSp3pSyGCzUocCa9fgBd_uUf2JQCjnFQ1IjNBmj70dPsXPBsniAjU86dC6fCcf7z_aBJecmBnH2PR1UbG10oyFI0szpnrtEu7m2YseE2bNv5Y4_7EiKrzw7wNVqGSif_T5ZiGmRDC
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH7w_PfqSjk9FEjVDKGVsnJpgL31V4PjHQuReZOsy22YYH_em39DCCB4IPq5BIWLSweGmL3PLDFqJNyKGr4JNOfCjyonqFqQqz2wmOkJyJ7yKUlLmvwMRaMnpaJSo_PPXxWArquIUO8Vs_3ncEndxQU_3vgcYciYqR3xYjMnLgkqQnq80LSK0otNOsgGDUxF9VP5zFX89CDHyR0bnIW8w==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFnz3xOPWokI6vgBT5ee7ZHASpcLryFz-87v5XW5NfkEUsM0nTM9jjp1X7jsQA8i0V8uEgItvhIvZSmwFqHcs6pVBylO58vtEyOqu3ZqXfIqZ-CTqhSFvwfHMYG-lUGOEisV5de5LCihZxiCDskvIi0lxDVR3huIMZDGvg0JtdP2HeP
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEET6KwbjAgHScRf6OJgnIomI4sAh2XrQGwoYEIxg6hy0wHxIpO7J4VTMZv6_-C6KP7AujYyuKYm-DK9K5hXhxZr170Aha7_eLG5Ou20t5xsUAlJm_s0FUulBW5CFdf4AHIv76mwvXAFlObCvlAvXsLSb4uJmEwz-ydeuyb4yVnM5Jg_GMmjUNygGy75Nkg5oNWhUqnTDOq7GKI9RzzVyZyU2hJ9B35yiw7T-U0KsOjCrx0JzSxXTIYArnBHLpcMCbLSk2h08oHalfLpTk4zJsepg==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEd0rFzxwdAekr8J-Ich2QK4UOU8vZJKRe64YrTwhG90TezjcMzhFVXHvLJZOOUtnnyn3ZCjOo4UqV97b-L1AkFSc6exhKP0J7ZFd2W5E2_9AuPBbV93qoMPoBIeMxGLks-7uIWlPb9QVVHrhiQ2tuMrKOVdDt8S7hHJ0_3wjvBFTFdcDkft3WJA6g-UaTtWugnDutLTQpgiUINd9wD3Kx0MF08S8dYNIwsdVUdvQS09qmotIbWaujaFaNdzhiR7_lg9g_Kew9WunTZFU_CRR3uL-hS-QUXIN0Z-W7xNPLx3Q==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGV1MDNAMsbC2jJgRv3pv5vect6cpAKnP7zkyaFgQaaZ2qu3MZhZq92jfOLKt0QQiDvG5NK4v07xdlOjL-kDannQKt49IyCQ5ATkm5BVIQX8cMwwqQ5SR8ygIGYHChLo_aMcCFiFODx
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF4ECEeMmrQAxv7Iydkh4uL73LR1LkEalITFAHg8fpktq2KvNQwxIiCNYusQg4IHqFHhMFH2EyHqi8LE-C4MDgzqi895qyyLMdw30rB4hlQceT7O22CizHuPqC1W_70HYTX3P4DGMzaB2wvAsZFi7Q4Dx3b2onQuJf0rJm_4iSDm15BFKEjbSjjdVHpiluhqqg6j9du70suKfEK5sIxZgeniBZ_xhA0-oov1Kh1R0nyiNAsZPewflOg-sBEjQ==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFQLOHtybiK8JyscUYs9W7sFnfuMRIiaR8OdOizfJS6Mvcj7z3aqzhKBICOZ3pxuods6riAERYLMem52QiB38fwo1Cj2s_VUgdj45xdrk2lYbd01lfiq_qSMgFppFDRjuY-uY68JkpgrxkWBY3KfA741pL9i09jUT8fciCWoGKezacpOnTwAxjma5qVI6YJf6rai2a1m8GdZ_0yiBxv2XAlLql6OBcE2c2146bkSi73q7aLKn6wyJP6
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFjuYUlzcdAJ1o4LLKP4tCWkNML2a1LoEEtoBlIUMH8sV4UBKTxK_aE5VF_oDuR7NnHUjlCogA_X6RzQv5Z8NZmzoYSJ1zXz4Q46NxR36KOI8PgeqPhezjS3_kvjbZ6VlMEj-rHyxbrG0Qb3WwpNd8lu1rzonF6CA4qke0NSS4ocp76cmh4yBHQzqeoSIqzjz-znK0q5duFeQK78OoEeJKUkGihBEi40A8=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHtdgcxd3i7criKy8DzWJ8oV-Cdserf0A4ejSSH_0JBl7NFeP30MsApVI8_cg-Ts6zCd4mMbMuR3avbc15_1HQtCekmawQuj3j9rrlt7I5-ac669QbopIznWlAUGFK7uhbarl8ABgqDnzaU9DQEYo3aWP2ZQs3d4lDrhhNLbgyUQYLCP5Fd1rLv4REmF7N7hkAXiD4q25HjBuRbl3HzUPo=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF7lV_3h9CiTj8nvFpZs4soK9xvxO9hMinT-ZBM_EiJx5Lp5XaYcq8aJFlRXC4aQJ5Ro3Ya8sa5yH4lHGLW6XZH3ETyEt6MnYJUpwoP9-tWg0YVkc1N9fgOvo3yP4pY8HEp4co8ZankORkSJsa1HUM-__F8AdgJiAVBNbvEcNDuoOCiFK3yMnNvnjeQC2L9DPlu1VbZRXT5nYOkui9XFc0EUiyV9Bkgl-FvXOW4
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG70yyUzzlISA8wJhxEorQixUZqqMbWC8pS7mslBLAnIs99Ai6iZ4TL9BvA-kS9m7–71sLALRzaFxQXuObeEG0eNQEQKK3aoOqGyTxSe9EemPQ7IwXr6jz2SU7l9uL6O_xbWEQeiDMILmW_FQm6H-bdPlwfW1aObsnaCUNH14nuUU4S2OhXML7HypzsgAgRGLeMOQ4aJllVuGJRw==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHKB5YOZG7kjkjLkQMuDCGn9AEQh5KqgMQY1bJYBmdil4845kKM5G3APJD40zFEAINEEOSDbOvsewu3FBvTM89a3uNlMKaqQe0y5aQnhrfeX_qOyStXVCbJImIJKv80nxmOv-aESIZPIqFLmYNfRyvOGojr-Wkf-kmX23OyNIWyhZ3zdNvWD5UCPAlSLbMHRTsgFiBoVXQqs6UCGr8vFlcPSUPn2A==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHQcoHM-88WsFcfFEFDM4V6MsiawQYxa7CrdOzvNurA-TEG2csjA15oOT8–4cVojNnMO9hLtRFvQIkyME8RjQFznMsXoNF0O7WuAUsuTQJ-mESWfEw7jm3DDvMBt6swha-cxzs8ETwun3YcAThVRG1bCboHcPI3QzZy_DKHY3BgRYpczLLWUknbOTj-3bopTgU3QZHXnhGmXGivZPxy2WhT5VWjQ==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF70kg9ZFIZdvf4Xb2xvDKOIPt7vU88xqrO6mKyY5BAPRrdgkdu3t9Zjr0YCUodRIH1759EQvDC6BwLGTyPw_LtmuUMLMQZNgmWSsM9Xr1Rs5vCjRBJHnrYkcsd4Qd3_X8xAwqNT_WRxk50gQy4Tq7NKaK9ndCpof3JWLRUx1Xd
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFHu-ASGKjdmRuVMmNJxiAGYoE_KPk4kllnuKcH7zSU9K5b_uJ2D9p9BM1ChUOgReo5vjAoWG308Pk0cC6CK4slO-f7OT7wu-PQoArM6hG4qSzPpDAXE0Rmjx2kKqabfMjRSxmgNY2RGfVzMqeUylQRoDlEKQQu0SAqHyrQcgeRtrghLjWB
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG6tJiGPrpz-9mdcVp0BHNqxRe22Cgf-Z6peBcPTJ1ERX7DL2qZTLNHYDkZpYWeoh6c0aKhF6U5KSDcEIBEqyvglz1gBJ-J52uW01iJ9b0jjw7zvaBH10DJo27d7Fa9EPm9SVGxDbtaw55o5KtR578MbCzFHrOjtjBRVvXtJ_AD1nnMOxzQmcx76YpyYobcntqehWlp84HoblNC_dhK
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEKL115aLuxExm3QW5Yon5t0oYlMid2U5qd7jN4KL1wh_ClMwQ3fL-PO1dRW9hgs2C4Ko0iwX_nL1OrTDU7K3byasV8XWydVAjWQGJaKGlgLpAiv45mL2DY07GpbB6Qs53Az48l8YbcJA5SFz1Nx5aHVC0wyP3bIdFrXePcjodOg1G43JdkQuHrSZaZOfuiF2JkuUVC
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHIJf1vi-i8Uz2s-jX5kaGT-5KuZOJ7dbvEhClJqiZi6vvB94iBClRSAghk6grt6SqxxIMPbPuSSTeYRTntv5v-QvZEACqIhVrCggIT-AW_Pw7ymGcaLZkHwe6FtwarGwXP5bF8InTAivnxjUmc_us5JjIqeoTbRzQlH5ojbijYxMf5lub_99n9S2jy_8ECFgR3PMgC0MVmi6HfCC6Oe4S7dg==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH3_bAEp3hz9KN1LFbhUKnpEKVd5zBrZG2OyS1Q8wMPELhEHS9_-Fa-J52YqzdYq7PEe-YUr5pd_l6UGO30qTI2WjWmnKucbICzikdn0FefSATtcwAcpeA9cCgn5-RaTKGwELERkO60KKtPy8i32Okf51DcYC8V5TTpH2SfQMxn91Dku1yadOSnJkSmxUM0B9UH9MTobw7ZfJ-iqm8YWOnm3BZN_ngwKjJJIzUb
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHy5T0pYsW5xfZUhar9L6rldMjrk9AazjgN6CqyL0PqkJZen6g0XqJfcYQUnBSkcXnE0LYBPLQsnZ0jgV3j2EDUjMvSC2kmhmanpG8ucEgxNxBZC6lisxWgUZE_3lMqwiiw69tYXBJtfV_gqAnxRaWtMSa49dD-E0C1_hfjtnQR534pUU5tlgF4YQrgg1HMvPYJLDp1dzNBCpw=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGYIyeG2iSJCm15B6tywXR9-sgqdmhD7-UqZ4WOHUca3UDh0SBylEYnVfyfho7Wh9wluPjd1Z6-GIdHj7IhDWvUVXGyk3G985j4HddDxMwzW1UbSZO3UCRTDxV2TLz9rXOdKhooaN8JUOsWCl–pCaZmLDf7L1Kl2NsuDEctgY=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF_TvDnkQvGoYZKsrEeWcogr-DYzCkL0EU3SFe6eFN6hy1GmxeBuVQJ6TVpgbZ01QC-mG5UAn5iXcPPK1Hyda2rfgVjBIUdKglQS_bRewEEXcMB8RzPnYNWJD1TMAQXoU-dSwmxVMVZcN3s628AnbcZFpuDriT1HgEeVjw2EPAHaIrZVTnF40T9naffKpf-EIEPZrKERrYKG7Z3FE9Ob-boIxjhICv2wnANBF0HPFW657XOBkS_XS8bFZ5qImGL7JHiz4tytbVOqgSEqs0O0ky-spNtbt7JAB_n7j5JlEHGyw==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEaEPs2zsSTPPyc2HGCprAlZorMwCjZG61hjiKz5PmNoju_244bkzxWaDCwKKoyXzHFqM5mpuQkpuUwl9oPI7EgpcVu7BFni8Gx-K-GAEWdvFA7S87YRHDbH0LG9Q-6gZ99oHo0HEi2VoE6BINvcWMdrCBMqlZ5pkqVOwGlwHLRhp1REL9o1vkyTQ5nEwGXchPWia64ccL9YVF501z4SzlDoSBRrYq818vz
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHqMv6CpvSUX3F6X9QEHpZILNdkFZEibDbgL9zgai5l32FkyjoYGoXDBDMsfVjS2H0b77irBI_dUrhSKs82fuiChpwRWiX05KYNz09TVVFm4vuG1IlvIPn-oEDAlgRA6fgp9gR47Ez-j-EIgAGHQlUOxFLsJTJGMb07wxw398rTl_gihm8Lo9hG_mueuNUyoQM225dfvyKC-XrUnm4QjXR21aHEAZUhmQIO6xTLMqlNM3jv1V_gO6EJv_wxtw1s1_O1tkINpNGmjtOy_7FfuvKmqnNrGn8uMu5B
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGfJnk4CZp4x3nNhi-R8tDP0B6tiQPOAA3Td4gKKS6GGo3mKU0rTAosG7xG8Lq8mOkBBP9OCOfvfCYdJmLlmgkJnCSJeZ0sbE1Kt9gwwxYfTcVUK1x2IJqHvEPxv67Jil0oytQxqeRGHM1AjfPgIy14NRJwSOYHiMps83mYY11VfAohwJcKHLPz4HwRdQZjrASE_WoFqUb_TL0u5WMllDe0AcgDbp9joON17kGjVg4WPA==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGAv4eg4Bb26b7u4bn_P7crFCRwJHBRjCmlqJg63tqUe897hxU4onaDZitzCwHFu6UCaWzAcD-KDSQ7KUNvK3M4Ca7M4Orsbov0EVSCmN5F9GBMHwdgxLirm-EV9gz5c4CWVkEkbuQnt02jThjT69F99N1hxa-Rbm3ubz6ST8HpI9EVUxGcxaosTlDjdTGOZwVE9A==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHIHImPsGw4eHS99yJGFYYNdFdDNNRMvnwxMnmMCi3Q_7JspGnW2xupdVT9rmKkcOtn6EVRf5SarXuxjQT1mpcKwwxgUBcagIrKAuknqsPRF3asTSF3gp0X0-TAPlyHJ9XIYxwpUCb4ftNYAobECe1KWbWP-zFsYMNqhRyyo8klxPWXj7-mdKH9ZI4dg7-gCim7oQ==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHthvTO0gNzIBNbybQnrCLlf0kS1pYyKAUlVcFYS7y_nIlzKIvOO37K61VfT_BxUFhJVK9QxCy8mBbbelfpeRqf2yr1xYSsShrPAZNFNzIh9o22ItYHx_OVGi_NddLEwoHDgf9YXXHhXTcZBRlGVDPm6jYHqKU=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG1p0DVGUAV4auNY1z8fxFI1xxDHYHVniLri_b-AwxVMb48PsR1EmoT6wmpCQbQRsIqPePCczFHHyMo0dXbcNWuOV-GvQTDGu28C9cyQb9f1DgUOTCSWhVSTZSYH6O1s29_Dk7ikd4VTegjdboYeCmN3AVTcHURv-FaM3tdY9Z4xUdopUZgHmbRkTlVkWSEty148scBfMPAmxCP–eC7Fzd5kRDA7tKRmVH8WZ0atnQGJfu3KA5HA==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFu7XWCazUidxS9x3pBOvtMintdJzGFE2eYDhBoCufN3AipMAmnWikz9Ye9tWlPKMubjH-eM6hqiE0nm6279xv4qJNAYtViH27Bby2cprONu1J4hgmqWjSJs9G2SPKaOug_8g4fsNHK9TfDgBuYwCnoBWLtgNWw6mjmWLB47BKUd7oDLNZC_8jsvIUVk_3ZljlHUct9dr3P-YyW4vdZ_QxpKQLwMI6aEApFNGbgePFMbtjBd0ZbUKMJrjNY7Og=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF1EC6P5gN4tr3BoJcqlY5G00p6q_Ijcsq8OPIHegy_y11uXJ0deWpoRg7hqJlMeKT9FF3H-8Z_Q2_hIEoHztKYjMyG85w0cBv4cLC0j03NoICxolbFJ_06zmYDTK-JJK_x9Usxx5GrL7Vx9BwNzPtWiFlRgpOzZBcljKvCiedyZBMBpi5iWe2gvenR
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFCNlCQFuTEHCWaYDqiP0w91xpBM3KS8oAPyvvScNxADTy7nH3tZQelyaJWWrCb5b4Te_U4Xfw_3emw5B9gYwQgHq11mA5hwJfqu0oGgNWN3ECcM49mPOcBp9F3oRbfB9Ywa4tZWkYt-0bwvvQiRvgToMnc
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEr6SEuHFJMk2aZS_CZSB44REZZnxvqVII6T0aApRCI29mXYpf9uyr6Y9iN85EK6kGqE5zOc8HW9crZ2cJcpw90qxnWxOPUZSWUae7rMDmpROoKDfIQFctzgOfdjNubZ5XW7OsfjlMR8SpwXGzk3U70nggani_UdJxLK8oKXI_h8MzzByUJaY7V7H_RomL6W-ecIMYpITh8Uto43mTTBmXHqL0AK-TrPF-LPf4sZrMod74jTsOAGoeuE_sFU4GWQeSya18VGV6WByAA
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFDYH3npLlblShvWM2NseEnhtuK4dP8kFpzM2qqsN8juhLHX1lJgQvJ-GpXvDfwpalfvppHj9blCBkWfEQX3Ze8YdRx2kwFtEsBkDcIQRNxQXoJAlTyMKMjsQB14phn_dPqPo1n0hLSrqfTzzTjfkK5JT1J6mFKc16_jaEiUEMoypFw484qkuHllR4CLOVJWNlrSLruhPSTr0K63tHOpbd4ctKJNh8alNSwPJ1A5q1v6gA9W0slqGEqqd_DaBBFykUopWxYXH6K0MPMTiM8paib3JkpW_7QuFg=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG4lXmDoc1lka1upR7m1bIX44Kk1XGcA2D-48Uu734m8SkQd3Yw-a2KByop4bxBz6dmLvuQ1HkTNVY2nUbXCk2CdFlpZauwkjOLJNE4oJVBTyXhu1itXJhn5cN6j27t1-J87cKEUE8RtF5xrV-P-GKgrkL-wt7aPXZ_8uSKaxkVMOaZ
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEUJlmL6IlaybgZMZazWSWbQKIxJ8ol0trgvcTm9udLXJ2NumRNWLdks64Kew1O2Ww88Cl7wzklsdThEUO2aLWBa3_nDyc9iWo_p-R_QHNZxYLUfXQMD05KlZ2zbqVOXNrsaG82pyO41jPkvfWXlVppBv15hxGq7efaulKzJB-ih6gu9iZeZw==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHDt70R_xbpGH_CRfOVw_tk3adAQcLR3hhFvouNKbjGRMqXj2-Fiu-kBspbucriEWE_Uv1Gqt0crg2LSeF1vPuWLprFkc_DrNhqzxpUkI5S76LKp8zt_S15gMcgPKco_jyC12BHCcx9kZBs6U2h10QvPT52XI51B3LSI4ITZ0lW5UsqxB7ZxFIoEqk7_Shk3bDlo0qex3wNB7xCtuKGfVuCJAMfBJXa-sGnCw==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEdITkskXaP1nb0Mu__FiH52-Ei5QnvN9DLuPQBcIQ7UdfblPpqkxY_tTgMQll7X_r7hheIr3fmkuRTgS4o1zrKggVFfQnpCGHN5wEvYT3XYllrl0XIKT79l6lozfX-o0ALUUFLuC1FapRA97HCP_HKK9dqTg1aWnDh2hwpdA8jHshxb4vaBavBtnxbfA7ehUFW2bzlaBuPPdnKul-rnYTnM-XQH-2bmt48c5VIBnpdh6L9IofxXE-ScR7MEnoDub76YTtJCr9IRmaCHlSnEWq_rrxnzx69e6od1u7z4GQehXFUVoygck91eh2jWVQxzumgsHW375J648FmpvbWfkf9GGx9uDRu_bQjSSxZEYJM_PsZsPtHv3Hco8tAKp8uT4KAXfWOz4Qov0_eJRf4YjER8hkECWQD0X6hCBLTyvWT7PNgnAL7fRVESKlT_gA8DUtH8YTQvDOPvLbiezOK8WU6dKqUN8Yf2uACbLsC8BBpIQd_R_5HoRroC_3B7HwaUgl1Q339tEk9iCgjxrLQj4vz_wiJQRQIAVfhTHMteV1FlW3UArm1mRTnuOhB6IGdoH4cf8w=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEZ-EyKLasEkezGBP3D5_5pGjN02LjVAe7pSIIaVLG45TH3DEglKbP9XASZX24Sru2XwQ_PfPupsUfxz7Ck0TrYkeL-1lE_IpDjxjPfIi1rRsdPxC-KLA6-9lDsDMYvDlP4vDcVuZzvZqM9gPoU6Jvop6OYKUmmmz_Tq0yS8jlgDmJSoZjLBWeGO7yTXNGt5bTktE9yHsNPy4fR-3_0fBDspP_iVU2lkB0pzhLYXUmfNw9qXcMnSeCw5-HYdAygmsfBQDy_33c9
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFAiWr5KFyi1gAkoVYiUqYW1AADGIdQIqcnn9qJ6B4IiGo8agDI2KdED8GLnN0Ocg9bd11cNUyJ9pPpu5QzTnoILYDFqgGQYzoEmiV_tyTEPbHRqpsh39OvbtM4PzUFdD4rXEdMES5jvYrjwx9dSA6UO0PjxcyxZ7laU_YMNJ6EU9jI1iVTiIJsjk3ESx46jXhh9M3OU5p2BIsYsrpJdak5byu6CgIxY_Z5z18=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGwl7RkCjRxrMK32OVWMlcV_5po_9CJZcEM1zXwofNon1eKTwrFBgGBgNKhna3gAWLTyukAdVOm77_F83E7G7pLIk3AF8HF7mKg4vC2KjjvikCR9qK2yJv8Ru0q6vwemyrvQT1feW9joqmnfsaSx7IRzI3y4YnBspQbxy2wkLtCNBgfsqRYn2nU-_bo6jpeCdza-wPWfv2UCeY44QmTZ2uWlP69iIpi
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFO3oWKcw-lK-OD0d6czfd9JyjUhNBEmW7-kDqZXroJKNdh7ZLHW1ajXsWC6s309Nfke6E5wI4sayd9EnLw7aY0KBQuFiU87o0QAzCzQ65UeOdfEy1z-IB6V8ZNo2E3_emJHciBsdY9cZ78I3vg62wI
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGQDTBJRBkPSC8rx4KIrehGImK_v7swPJsr6S3Yeh9FF9dV95RSl0e97Af6xNBVSDfDrYTCGC9atW_7jQQwJ1JJwZyQp-O5w0KVPutJIzxE0jdKt5dkLWv2A_pxqMoAdYB0-2dPDQPPboHFRK8u2OCRdIbgu-wJeBvd90vFbryC6dhgbPHBCSW1LG5iadW9hggOubqMmA==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEgC_MrMRDWC_uuw_uGzakpw-bMs6qcdSeYkEo4hOAKl8WdTFIJRALntngPWQ-2JyNnxx_4agH7Zl-dhI15AwP1EExkIBGOztSlGOPYTCf5613MCY3hDU0jC-gWicieKs-aQYfqcXwZboCBZQ7TFTGnVwqdwFRfcTtQaBqLtosbyoARjbOtukygWqdsjBolV-SXxZ_VVTBE-v7J
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGE27OXeXQgK1BD3tr8a_PYR32kdjNJaK6VxPXAJwmjKJexaFGDZi3b7lvds7CxR4QZnxeSYW3lbUZDzzlNluDcKAiD3azxAByk7uzAAyPp4Na1J-vCDSIcfGGudQXPC4T7Fb77GJ3KzFBzLqMoKzPuWfY-v5Md_a7dGH1PkpvASaFoOTLfzvrQMZ3wWfrOSFqi4A==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEXPlRi_TZvrI1RsLVj9imEk-ixHfM2frS2uefxPFtrPP8oxAOsp6Mx3yqCL-l-Clym9Yq-dR7O4FSG8tuIfzSob27rPdAwI8Z5IEHPRu7rSqX0F35kK-vmZ4sKVIvT8_cNNUOpvHrOj0bTRiZQo9piqOkMCJG491yud3ZqvSSjrb3GBnCmYbMARzSvYCtfzCmOEmGPrmyiCsxzCTKwo6J2kX1P8I0V1v9U7huvOfTZW3IoQOAgEJEYT1tbmw==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEuNG07oM5enX6txxV91di0g9ApIHgh6LPTOKVEgo1W9Gr8lsWzvvfNdWZS-FTAlBSZfdrZ-YRDDqNAWJbiEUJq64apCqf4QYVgVvTPBXPe7Vz7SFEM4wTHrNhEokpMjinc0kLlVzx9PB5rtshFdQ3kmiZe_Jp_GSXFW6gmDJb26vK9kNmX
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHRaLiY0Pkvt1YmBhNVunvZw1q6WK_sIcnwEzo3kz7BeDxnXy1jzo6jdBXQgApcye7H9L4CwxzomGsA3sch90ERk49ykOOKKLPRptrs7imzcLIURxfw5CaBQ_zIW6SI7X6F-4I=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEardUGjtHNUzloMfajGRzAmq0PuOnxQA0LmsWVAvnPmj2qIw0mLCUPAmnBqeuK5JtPcrZLkTXXIcoD8sjfwPRSVrJok3R4vfsZqA2Ph2DAJJGpMFVVrtO55TXjVsX6BBMxm7X9o6413grHYrY96r7Yr4Kb2pNZUrkDBJRHZot8B0S_r4p_aMTZg8QctcLIllH6olRWYnqP_A==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEMyS9uepaIdLoWl1l9Xf_D39KGwfc0ZOJ1PQBEfGl_8N_WMQqdh1i86nDNyQSBMx_9O_UU2pGQQKfyX3UCuKWB9qxK6tHSKjfrfBm0gN2UA_XZD3GFbw0xq1LHhMqPTr93oWnxwSQPf2LUkORXHCtdq1hZ5FhCZKzGJyMn8iwRfk6Z0Lu1TjI6_SYE
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHM-gWFXB_HCvxcrRy4fS05Ab9eEkUSrRfpfNEswzLi6uuOn0rP4_nCndW6KAtmsDQqWjGKN7G1QXCQzznLSvyuJXUW4dv4uPU2SLmMuJK-qehrYoQKWOYiCmE2f53IZPETMnwEdpDgvRbREqSGrIWxlr3GGEsyhnt23M3VMBvdxjHhL6ubtYHqvrbhMXWFyanmtiruYHxaG20HaPGujX4=
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGrGYcFGUW2rxUb92zF65-qEhi8EB7Fpk4RlyrnmY47X2Y59d_l7_DPGxmBYtJZjhyWHaFkmphQ-_SzhgUwPkKNJGvPxdTjGCYN_dUy6hjJJEsH9_z7GKDcnfKk9nmWn3XxGnxYwYVzeAx2z8ZR6t9PNlNCkv36eR2Yy7cWOraHlDBDzS-OZCjAcxVunw==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG0nTddBSKO3aWi3UtxfnuSxI1ZkMPwIveQqdbPLrtEzXI63Yyu69_yGvFn5zIEJtEfhRNiclUjHcBLAACgEsn-bWX4HT8NIxgf5E-z6JPMKqVgXCS3-jpsleXjSS7mPW7Bskk8L68df_5-LNHHatREtQ9I-kcvdzZp8GsSIYIuaX8VXnsWlFcQZRugFmNr7Tt1RpOOeW5658r_qHSk9gQUsdcjXlJUA77cpXGqqg==
• https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGWYuVkdWHdR0-X5hrkeWUpSUGgsy9FL0IuzYn8qHVxlaF03_L-RQofGwBDjgsWdjr8ExDnxOp1nLj5_mEg7qL6gQUQCBabItAVz7nxYvo821fL3BlQodm3iD3iLEdGsDvipqiK-rGW6Sp-s2QxQuNUZPoLuwRjDQDQIzMAhrthCaZ2TVR_sQ3vppqFrq9SBQ==