Gender-based violence in post-conflict Africa is a silent emergency that rarely makes headlines. In war-torn regions, women and girls face not only the immediate terror of warfare but also a continued onslaught of violence long after peace accords.
From the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to South Sudan, Rwanda, the Central African Republic (CAR), Liberia and beyond, survivors tell a grim story: rape as a weapon of war, brutal attacks in crowded resettlement camps, forced marriage and trafficking.
Societies frequently blame survivors and fail to prosecute perpetrators. Yet the scale is massive. For example, an Afrobarometer survey finds 38% of Africans say GBV is “somewhat” or “very” common in their country, and 31% shockingly believe a husband’s use of force can sometimes be justified.
This report digs beneath the surface to expose that crisis. It weaves investigative analysis with hard data, survivor testimony, expert commentaries, and images from the field.
Our findings, based on NGO and UN reports, academic studies and first-hand accounts, reveal harrowing patterns: women raped as targets of ethnic violence, abused in displacement camps, and left at the mercy of lawless armed groups or indifferent institutions.
We document systemic failures like weak laws, impunity, stigma and probe what (if anything) is being done to break the cycle.
Throughout, survivors’ voices and legal experts sound the alarm. While progress has been made in recognizing GBV as a war crime globally, on the ground in Africa, justice is still too often a promise unfulfilled.
In eastern DRC, for instance, newly displaced women are living nightmares that began at gunpoint. “Two-thirds of women were attacked at gunpoint,” reports Christopher Mambula, head of MSF’s Congo programs. He describes victims snatched while fetching water or firewood, then gang-raped by armed men in and around camps.
MSF, the medical humanitarian group, says 25,166 survivors of sexual violence sought care in DRC in 2023, more than double the previous annual average. The first half of 2024 showed no relief: by May 2024, MSF had treated 17,363 women in North Kivu alone, already 69% of 2023’s total. A June 2025 MSF report (North Kivu) revealed “nearly 40,000” survivors treated in 2024, an unprecedented surge.
Yet Congo is not an outlier. In CAR, decades of civil war and the spillover from neighboring Sudan have made camp life perilous for women. “Life is dangerous for women in this camp,” says Mariam Zakaria, a CAR returnee now in a northern refugee camp.
After fleeing violence in Sudan with her seven children, Mariam earns meager wages selling goods. She admits: “If you want to work, someone might not hire you unless they can take advantage of you. And if a woman doesn’t accept, her children will get nothing to eat.”
In CAR’s displacement settlements, agencies report “rising at alarming rates” the number of women and girls forced into prostitution, trafficking or marriage. One UNFPA case manager in CAR warns, “we receive a lot of cases of rape of minors, adults are raped too. Women [who] go to the forest to look for wood etc get assaulted.” These are not isolated anecdotes: UN data shows the CAR is among the most dangerous places for women in Africa.
In South Sudan, the world’s youngest nation, years of civil war (2013–2020) saw systematic sexual violence. Our investigative sources describe pregnant women hiding from rebels in bunkers, only to be dragged out and repeatedly raped by soldiers.
One survivor, “Teresa”, recounts with trembling voice how in December 2013 she and her children were attacked in Juba: “Seven armed men in uniform, took [my husband] outside and shot him while I tried to run with my children. They captured me and started raping me repeatedly.”
This is murder by another name: they later killed her family and left Teresa pregnant with a child she cannot care for, their futures destroyed. Human rights organizations documented 175 rapes in four months of 2018 alone, including infants aged eight. Despite such evidence, the South Sudanese government has often dismissed or downplayed these reports.
Meanwhile, across West Africa the scars of earlier wars linger. In Liberia, the 1989–2003 civil conflict saw gender violence used to terrorize communities. The UN reports that roughly 61–77% of Liberian women were raped during the war. A Liberian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) condemned these atrocities and urged national courts to prosecute war criminals.
Two decades later, most remain free: surviving warlords hold high office and the TRC’s recommendations have largely been ignored.
In Nigeria, the government’s failure to support Boko Haram survivors also echoes this pattern of impunity. Recently liberated girls, some as young as eight, recall forced marriages to militants and relentless beatings. Amnesty International reports that when these victims escape captivity, “they are still being left to fend for themselves”, with no shelter, schooling, or compensation. “We need support for shelter and food,” one 17-year-old escapee told Amnesty, a plea that remains unanswered.
These stories underscore systemic failures. Across Africa, legal accountability for war-time GBV is rare. We consider how national courts and international tribunals have (or have not) addressed rape and abuse.
We draw lessons from other conflicts from Bosnia and Rwanda to the Middle East to understand where Africa fits into the global picture of wartime sexual violence. Experts stress that until societies change how they view women’s rights, violence will persist.
As Kenyan activist Wangechi Wachira observes: “Rape takes away someone’s dignity, [Victims] blame themselves and this leads to a high number of victims going silent.”
Indeed, an Afrobarometer survey finds over half of Africans expect survivors to be shamed or harassed if they report abuse. Breaking that silence is critical to solving this crisis. This report lays bare the hidden suffering in Africa’s fragile peace, calling for urgent action to protect survivors and punish offenders.
The DRC’s Crisis: Rape in the Shadow of War
Eastern Congo has long been synonymous with conflict rape. Multiple armed groups, foreign militias and even government troops have used sexual violence strategically. Recent data show the crisis is worsening, not fading. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) reports an “explosion” of sexual attacks during 2023–24. In 2023 alone, MSF clinics treated 25,166 survivors nationwide, an unprecedented figure. By mid-2024 MSF had already seen 17,363 cases in North Kivu province (around Goma). MSF warns 2025 remains on track to surpass these grim records.
Much of this violence happens to internally displaced persons (IDPs). As fighting broke out between the Congolese army and rebel groups (notably M23) in late 2021, hundreds of thousands fled their homes. They gathered in sprawling camps near Goma, living in overcrowded conditions with little protection. “The lack of safe shelter and sanitation leaves women vulnerable,” explains Christopher Mambula of MSF.
With armed men lurking nearby, women must venture out for firewood or water, where they are ambushed. “On the sites themselves, but also in the surrounding area,” says Mambula, “women and girls who accounted for 98% of the victims” are targeted in their day-to-day tasks. MSF found that two-thirds of these assaults are gang rapes at gunpoint.
“According to the testimonies of our patients, two-thirds of them were attacked at gunpoint when women and girls who accounted for 98% of the victims went out to collect wood or water or to work in the fields,” Christopher Mambula (MSF) said.
Survivor accounts confirm this pattern. MSF notes that in over 91% of cases in their programs, the attack happened either in the camp or en route. A woman patient recently told aid workers: “I had just fetched water from the river and was heading back when armed men appeared. They took me into the bushes.” Such stories are echoed across Congo: local radio and aid agencies regularly receive testimonies of similar assaults.
In addition to direct violence, displaced women face exploitation. Some women report being coerced into sex by camp guards or community leaders in exchange for access to food or services. Others become victims of transactional sex just to feed their families. “Sexual exploitation to support families is one of the complications,” notes MSF. Poverty is extreme: one UN assessment found many IDP women going without food for days, making them desperate for any means of survival.
Despite the scale of suffering, Congolese justice systems struggle to respond. Police and courts are weak or corrupt, and impunity is rampant. Few perpetrators i.e soldiers, rebels or gang members have faced trials.
International efforts have centered on the International Criminal Court (ICC); for years the ICC pursued Congo’s former Vice President Bosco Ntaganda for crimes including rape. But at the local level, survivors see no recourse. “On paper there seem to be many programmes to prevent and respond,” says Mambula, “but on the ground, our teams struggle every day to refer victims who need help.” The promised services are often short-lived or underfunded.
A Human Cost – Voices from Congo
The human toll is devastating. MSF clinics note that 1 in 10 survivors they treated in 2023 were children (girls and some boys under 18). One raped mother spoke to MSF of seeing an attacker aim his rifle at her young daughter before turning the gun on her. Other stories collected by journalists tell of pregnant women stabbed in the abdomen after rape, or babies born as a result of war-time rape.
Beyond physical injury, survivors suffer trauma and stigma. In the Kivu region, as in much of Africa, a rape victim can be ostracized by her community or divorced by her husband. HIV infection is a persistent threat; MSF reports treating many rape survivors for sexually transmitted infections and emergencies like forced pregnancy terminations.
Local social norms often blame the victim. One Congolese aid worker said: “Women who have been raped often hide it. They feel ashamed, fearing rejection or revenge from attackers.” This echoes findings in other African conflicts for example, in Rwanda after 1994 women who had survived mass rape were frequently ostracized.
“The lack of sanitation and safe shelter for women and girls leaves them vulnerable. On paper there seem to be many programmes but our teams struggle every day to refer victims who need help,” Christopher Mambula (MSF).
Institutional Failure in the Congo
Why does it continue? Partly because Congo’s long wars have shattered institutions. The justice system is weak, and security forces themselves are often perpetrators or impassive bystanders. In North Kivu, for instance, human rights monitors have documented soldiers standing guard as allies commit rapes. Victims rarely file complaints, for fear of reprisals or lack of trust. International pressure has been intermittent.
In 2010 the UN Security Council renewed resolutions on sexual violence, but follow-through by member states has lagged. Meanwhile aid funding has been inconsistent: one report notes that as Congo’s crisis worsens, international donors are cutting budgets for services to survivors.
Comparative insight (Bosnia/Rwanda): This pattern of post-conflict impunity is not unique to Congo. In the Balkans (1992–95) and Rwanda (1994), conflict rape was rampant. International war crimes tribunals later classified rape as genocide/war crime. Yet local prosecutions were slow, and many victims never found justice. Today’s Congo echoes that earlier failure: Rwanda’s Tribunals indicted commanders like George Rutaganda, but many lesser perpetrators in remote areas escaped. In eastern Congo, one study notes, survivors often ask, “will any authority ever punish this?”
Refugee Camps: No Safe Haven
When wars end or shift, survivors often flee. Millions of Africans are uprooted by conflict, seeking safety in refugee or IDP camps. Shockingly, these camps – intended as sanctuaries – become breeding grounds for gender violence. Overcrowding, lawlessness, and extreme poverty create a “silent nightmarish ecosystem,” as one UN health official put it.
Take the case of the Korsi camp in northern Central African Republic. Here tens of thousands of refugees from Sudan live in flimsy huts. Mariam Zakaria’s story (introduced earlier) exemplifies the violence waiting within these camps. She arrived pregnant and haunted by rapes committed by militias in Sudan. But in Korsi she found injustice closer to home: “If a woman doesn’t accept [sexual demands], her children go without food,” she says, describing a barter of sex for survival.
Aid groups report that rape and coercion are widespread in Korsi. A UNFPA worker notes: “We receive a lot of cases of rape of minors. Adults are raped too. Women go to the forest to look for wood and [are] assaulted.” With guards absent or complicit, even walking to a latrine is dangerous at night.
Similar scenes play out across Africa. In eastern DRC’s displacement sites, an MSF survey found that nearly 60% of female IDPs had experienced sexual violence since the latest fighting began. Many attacks happen inside the camps by unknown gunmen or fellow displaced. In Somalia, scuffles over scarce food have led to gang rapes in UN camps. In Western Ethiopia, refugee camps for South Sudanese have faced repeated sexual assaults.
And in sprawling transit camps on the Chad-Sudan border, countless women report abduction or forced marriage as they travel for aid. According to UN estimates, up to one quarter of victims in CAR’s displacement areas are children, mirroring global data that up to 1 in 3 conflict rapes involves minors. Trafficking rings also hunt camps: traffickers bribe hungry families or abduct girls under cover of darkness. “Some go missing,” a relief worker in Ghana’s camps warned, “and their relatives never hear from them again.”
Domestic violence surges when men and women live trapped together without support. NGOs report that, in many camps, husbands seethe over loss of status and rage against wives. “Physical assault within marriages is common, as well as psychological violence,” says Léonce Issouf Dessoula, a CAR case manager.
Women rarely can challenge their abusers. In Liberia’s postwar camps, studies showed that displaced wives were often hit if they received food cards without husbands. In Sierra Leone’s camps after 2002, women told our partners they lived in constant fear of drunken former fighters returning home. These camps become pressure cookers: stressed families turn on each other, and trauma piles up in silence.
On the legal front, refugees often have no recourse. Host governments prioritize security over women’s safety. In Kenya’s Dadaab and Kakuma camps (home to Somali and South Sudanese refugees), human rights groups have documented dozens of assaults where Kenyan police did not follow up. Sometimes camp managers themselves are predators.
Al Jazeera reported how South Sudanese girls who reported rape to UN police at Dadaab were instead expelled or shunned. One survivor in Uganda’s camps said she stopped reporting after soldiers threatened her with disease. The UN’s own guidelines on refugee protection emphasize GBV prevention, but funding shortfalls and corruption mean many safe spaces for women are understaffed or far from reach.
The result is a vicious cycle: conflict causes displacement, displacement breeds GBV, and GBV traumatizes communities, making lasting peace even harder to build. Without breaking this cycle, humanitarian efforts remain incomplete.
South Sudan’s Untold Survivors
In South Sudan, decades of war have normalized the unspeakable. Since independence in 2011, internecine fighting between political factions has torn families apart. It’s not widely known internationally, but hundreds of thousands of South Sudanese women and girls report being raped during the conflicts. One 2019 Al Jazeera investigation documented just a slice of this horror.
At a Kenyan refugee camp in Dadaab, we meet “Teresa” (name changed), a former Juba resident. She is a slender 33-year-old mother, deeply scarred by violence. When Kiir-Machar factional fighting erupted in Dec 2013, Teresa and her husband fled, trusting UN protection. Instead, she says, “It was December 17, 2013, when seven armed men in uniform forced their way into our house. They took my husband and his two brothers out and shot them.” Then they turned on Teresa. “I tried to run out for safety with my children but they captured me and started raping me repeatedly.” They stole her kids; she never saw them again.
For months, she hid in camps until she could make it to Kenya, giving birth to one of her attacker’s children here. Today she struggles to feed that child on UN rations. She says: “I will never go back to South Sudan. I have told the UN and other agencies to never take me back.” Her voice cracks with a mix of defiance and despair.
Teresa’s case is not unique. A U.N. commission reported that between September and December 2018 alone, 175 women and girls were raped in South Sudan, including at least 49 children under 18. In November 2018 the medical NGO MSF documented an astonishing 125 rapes in 10 days in just one town (Rubkona) in northern South Sudan. Those figures emerged around the signing of a peace deal, underscoring that promises of peace did not stop crimes.
These facts have been contested by Juba’s authorities. In mid-2019, South Sudan’s gender minister flatly denied the surge, calling it “unfounded”. “No facts found to verify the rape cases,” she claimed to international media.
But survivors and aid groups disagree. Many women remain silent for fear of dishonor and reprisals – “every time I see a group of men, I get re-traumatized,” Teresa says. Victims like her face stigma at home. As activist Wangechi Wachira explains, “Rape takes away someone’s dignity…and [society’s attitude] leads to a high number of victims going silent.” South Sudanese culture often blames the victim or fears family vengeance. Even among South Sudanese in exile, widows like Teresa report being shunned by their communities.
By 2019, even UN investigators were calling these attacks systematic. UN agencies warned women were being targeted along ethnic lines to terrorize the opposition. One academic told Al Jazeera: “The devastating role of sexual and gender-based violence as a strategic weapon of war has positioned women and girls as a battlefield… South Sudan has no capacity to stop these atrocities, leave alone give justice to its victims.”
This grim assessment holds. In 2021, Human Rights Watch reported dozens of documented cases of rape and abduction by both sides’ soldiers, with virtually no prosecutions. Local justice is near-impossible: judges are underpaid, courts lack forensic labs, and witnesses are scarce.
Expert insight: South Sudan’s predicament mirrors a common pattern. Violence that was once the shame of war becomes normalized after it ends. Conflict veterans with guns return to families, carrying impunity. Training security forces on gender rights has been limited. As one regional expert told our team, the new government signed onto international anti-GBV treaties, but implementation “has been sporadic; often NGOs do the work the state should”.
In camps like Dadaab, life for South Sudanese women is uneasy. They are cut off from home but still entwined in their country’s conflicts. Aid programs exist (like counseling centers), but stigma remains. Many avoid the local hospital for fear of being recognized or having to relive trauma with strangers. Women’s groups have started peer support circles, but funding is scant.
In late 2024, the U.N. Special Representative on Sexual Violence emphasized South Sudan’s need to prosecute perpetrators and care for survivors. Yet one prosecutor admitted off-record: “We can’t ignore the generals and their men; they’re still armed and influential. Who will protect us if we bring them to court?”
Liberia and Sierra Leone: Echoes of Past Wars
West Africa has its own painful history. The brutal civil wars in Liberia (1989–2003) and Sierra Leone (1991–2002) were among the most sexually violent conflicts of the era. In Liberia, wartime rape was endemic. The Liberian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) later reported that an estimated “between 61% and 77% of women and girls in Liberia were raped during the war”. Sierra Leone’s rain of terror saw at least 200,000+ women raped, according to HRW.
After the wars, survivors faced profound neglect. In Liberia, the TRC recommended prosecuting rape as a war crime and funding survivor support. Instead, successive governments largely ignored these findings. Many former warlords became politicians or wealthy businessmen, confident that “the war is over, we can move on” except for the victims left behind. One Liberian survivor, now a school teacher, recently wrote: “After we survived the horror, society still punished us. I was blamed for surviving. My attacker served in parliament.” (Her name withheld). Justice in Liberia has remained elusive; only in 2014 did the country finally start a Special Court for war crimes, and even that has stalled.
Sierra Leone offers a rare bright spot. It established the “Rainbo Centers” i.e clinics providing medical and counseling care to rape victims. The International Rescue Committee (IRC) helped open three such centers, and between 2003–2005 they treated over 1,700 survivors. However, only a handful of perpetrators were ever prosecuted. Traditional systems often pressured survivors to marry their attackers instead of pressing charges.
Cultural taboos meant that many rapes went unreported; women feared being “forced to marry” the attacker or being deemed unclean. Post-war efforts in Sierra Leone to educate communities and train female doctors (at these centers) helped some survivors heal, but the social wound remains. Today, studies show domestic violence in both countries is still rife, with many people unconvinced that wartime rapes were wrong or that survivors deserve compensation.
Comparative insight (Latin America): West African experiences have parallels in conflicts like Guatemala’s civil war, where truth commissions also exposed mass rape and child sex slavery by military units. In Guatemala and Liberia alike, survivors have demanded reparations. Liberia’s women activists have even filed a petition to the Ecowas Court of Justice, seeking collective reparations, but a decade on they wait for a verdict.
Nigeria: Forced Marriage and the Boko Haram Stigma
While not a traditional post-conflict zone, northeast Nigeria’s battle with Boko Haram (2009–present) has created similar gender horrors. Militants seized villages, abducted girls, and sold or married them to fighters. When the Army retook territory, many escapees returned home pregnant or sick, only to face neglect.
In June 2025, Amnesty International released testimonies from young women who had escaped Boko Haram. These girls, many just teenagers, describe years of forced marriage and abuse. Isa Sanusi, director of Amnesty Nigeria, condemned the government’s inertia: “It is unacceptable that…the authorities still cannot ensure these girls and young women are able to rebuild their lives in safety,” she said. Amnesty found that none of the interviewed survivors had received the counseling, medical care or vocational training promised under Abuja’s reintegration plan.
Often, after escaping, girls encountered security forces who treated them as suspects, not victims. One survivor recounted: she and other girls were rounded up but “not transferred to civilian authorities for appropriate care,” as Nigeria’s handover protocols require.
The personal stories Amnesty collected are heartbreaking. LC*, a 17-year-old who spent most of her childhood as a jihadist wife, says neither the UN nor Nigerian government gave her anything upon release. AN*, 13, describes her escape: “We tried to run twice…they just flogged us… If you do something wrong, they just flog us.” Then she begged for help: “We need support for shelter and food,” she told Amnesty.
GP*, another girl of 13, was taken to a Nigerian military camp and then to a displaced children’s center, where by chance she reunited with her mother. But even she emphasizes the lack of assistance: “[We receive] no support from anybody since we came out of the bush…We go to the bush, get some firewood and sell it.” Boko Haram atrocities have known global attention (e.g. the 2014 Chibok schoolgirls kidnapping), yet these women feel “invisible”.
Nigeria is a signatory of the UN Maputo Protocol and African Children’s Charter, which mandate survivor care. Yet Amnesty’s interviews found none of the child survivors were informed of special recovery programs. Government officials have been dismissive. One local official told Amnesty last year, “You escaped and survived, now you must provide for yourself”. It was an echo of the indifferent official stance seen in other African contexts (compare CAR’s minister dismissing camp rape reports).
The Boko Haram case illustrates how conflict-related GBV can morph into underreported domestic abuse. Many of these young women, now living with relatives or in IDP camps, are unwilling to speak out for fear of being stigmatized as “tainted” or even arrested for adultery. Human rights observers in Maiduguri note that civilian courts have struggled to prosecute even the well-documented cases from rescued girls. Meanwhile, the victims’ needs – from obstetric care to psychological counseling – remain largely unmet.
Gender Violence Across the Sahel and Beyond
Other African theaters of conflict also witness GBV horrors. In the Sahel (Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger), Islamist insurgencies have led to kidnappings and sexual slavery of local women. In Mali’s 2012 crisis, reports emerged of mass rape by armed groups, but few prosecutions followed. In Nigeria’s Lake Chad area (Borno State) too, besides Boko Haram, farmers’ militias have been accused of attacking women in fields.
In the Horn of Africa, the long Ethiopian civil conflicts in Oromia and Amhara regions have seen extrajudicial violence including rape. Sudan’s decades of north-south war (1960s–2000s) left thousands of “Sudanese Mummy women”: victims of mass rape who still live with trauma and (often unwanted) children of soldiers.
Though South Sudan split from Sudan in 2011, gender violence continues – recent reports from West Darfur indicate renewed sexual assaults after the 2023 Sudan conflict. In genocide-era Rwanda, over 250,000 women were raped, and survivors are still living with stigma, infertility, and HIV (as documented by Human Rights Watch).
Comparative insight (Global): The patterns in Africa echo those elsewhere. In the Balkans, the infamous 1992–95 conflict saw systematic rape camps; decades later, survivors’ networks demanded international justice. In Latin America, after Argentina’s Dirty War, forced sterilization and sexual torture of “disappeared” women came to light only after democracy.
In Asia, during Bangladesh’s 1971 war and Sri Lanka’s civil war, rape was used to terrorize communities. These comparisons show that sexual violence is a global facet of war. Yet, international responses vary. The International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda (ICTY, ICTR) convicted leaders for rape and sexual slavery, setting legal precedents.
The United Nations now labels rape as a war crime and a form of genocide. But on-the-ground enforcement in Africa remains weak. As a 2020 UN report noted, while “sexual violence is now widely recognized as a war crime…in practice it remains widely under-prosecuted.”
Legal and Institutional Accountability
Breaking the cycle requires holding perpetrators to account – a daunting challenge in fragile states. Africa has taken important legal steps: virtually all countries are party to CEDAW (the UN Convention on Women), and regional instruments like the AU Maputo Protocol criminalize rape and forced marriage.
Rwanda, for instance, has one of the continent’s strongest rape laws, following its post-genocide reforms. The continent also boasts some exemplary courts: the Special Court for Sierra Leone (2002–2013) included for the first time forced marriage in its indictments. But many African states lack the capacity or will to use these tools.
In the DRC, Congolese law punishes rape with up to life imprisonment, but prosecutions are rare. One UN lawyer commented in 2023 that local judges feel intimidated by powerful warlords who still influence politics, so “cases often die at preliminary investigation.” At the ICC, Congo’s cases have also stalled; the Ntaganda trial (involving rape and conscription of child soldiers) concluded in 2019, but only a fraction of evidence from North Kivu has been pursued.
More widely, African heads of state have often resisted external intervention. When the U.N. Security Council demanded full probes into DR Congo’s conflict rapes, Kinshasa replied that it was already handling it – though no public indictments ever emerged.
South Sudan’s fledgling courts are similarly weak. The 2018 peace agreement mandated a hybrid court for crimes (to be created jointly by Juba and the AU), but as of 2025, that court still exists only on paper. Meanwhile, local customary systems sometimes offer alternatives (peace panels, compensation payments), but these often sideline women’s voices.
A widow in Jonglei State once told us her rapist was made to pay a goat to her family as “atonement” – an offer she rejected as absurd. In rural CAR, many survivors go to local chiefs instead of police. Often the chiefs demand the victim marry the abuser under the guise of “restoring honor” (a practice sadly common in some communities).
International NGOs like the International Criminal Court, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, or the Special Criminal Court in CAR have jurisdiction over some abuses – but their reach is limited by budgets and politics.
On the survivor support side, institutional responses often fall short. Many countries in our focus still lack comprehensive GBV strategies. In DRC and South Sudan, there are few dedicated shelters for rape victims. In Liberia and Sierra Leone, mental health services are scarce; war rape survivors are twice as likely to suffer PTSD or depression, but find little therapy.
Often international agencies (UNHCR, UNFPA, NGOs) provide the only counseling or legal aid available, and those too can be erratic if donor interest wanes. In CAR, UNFPA runs safe spaces, but as budgets shrink, shelters close. Mariam Zakaria’s despair is worsened by a cut in funding to these programs.
Voices of Accountability: Despite obstacles, there are advocates. Lawyers and activists in Africa press for justice. In Freetown, the first female judge vowed to expedite war rape cases; in Kigali, a Genocide Survivors Fund provides microloans to women left widowed or orphaned. UN Women has trained police in Uganda and Kenya to handle GBV cases more sensitively. Yet as one regional legal expert admitted, “few African governments have made prosecuting wartime sexual violence a top priority. At best, they pay lip service.”
Survivor Voices: Testimonies from the Field
Our investigation interviewed survivors and aid workers across the continent to bring these numbers to life. Their words reflect both agony and resilience.
Central African Republic (returnee): “They told me to come and they would give me work,” recalls 32-year-old Mariam Zakaria. Instead, men in Birao demanded sex for jobs or food. “If a woman doesn’t accept, her children go hungry,” she said. Every day Mariam risks rape or exploitation just to feed seven children. Despite this, she volunteered as a mentor to help newly arrived survivors. (Mariam Zakaria, CAR)
Democratic Republic of Congo (internally displaced woman): “The soldiers told me, ‘Sit down quietly’ before they started taking off my clothes. They raped me one after another,” said a mother of two from North Kivu. After the attack she fled deeper into the camp, but nights remain terrifying. (Identity withheld for safety)
South Sudan (refugee “Teresa”): “They raped me and killed my family members,” Teresa recounts. The crime was committed by soldiers meant to protect her; she says, “I feel like justice cannot be done in my case.” Today in Kenya she struggles with trauma and has vowed never to return to her homeland.
Nigeria (Borno State survivor “AN”): “We tried to run twice but they caught us…they flogged us…If you do something wrong, they flog us,” AN says of life under Boko Haram. After escaping, this 13-year-old found no help from authorities. “We need support for shelter and food,” was her plea, delivered at the Amnesty office.
Liberia (activist/witness): “We were girls forced to dance for fighters – that was our punishment if we refused their advances,” recalls a survivor from Nimba County. Now she works with an NGO to counsel rape survivors, noting that many still fear families’ reprisals if they speak out. (Reported to JusticeInfo newsletter 2023)
International expert (Kenyan lawyer): “Even if a country has laws, we see cultural barriers – police doubt women’s claims, or families pressure them to hush up,” says one human rights lawyer in Nairobi. She emphasizes the need for education at all levels. (Interview, Nairobi 2024)
These testimonies, while harrowing, also highlight survivors’ determination. Many now call for change. In March 2025, CAR survivors confronted lawmakers in Bangui, demanding reinstated funding for GBV clinics. In Juba, a network of rape survivors has sued military commanders at the East African Court of Justice. In DRC, women’s groups rally against sexual slavery and minors’ forced marriages (rape cases of camp returnees). The fight for justice is ongoing.
Emerging Developments and Hope
Despite the grim picture, there are signs of progress. In the last decade African governments and civil society have gradually recognized gender violence as a security issue. The African Union adopted a continental Plan of Action Against GBV (2016) and the UN Security Council continues to emphasize protecting women.
Some post-conflict states are improving: Rwanda, scarred by genocide, has invested heavily in women’s welfare and now boasts the highest proportion of women in parliament globally. Former victims there receive some government pensions and health coverage. Sierra Leone continues expanding its Rainbo centers.
In DRC, the latest national strategic plan (2021–25) names sexual violence a top concern, with pledges for more forensic labs and survivor clinics. Civil society groups have also grown more vocal: Congolese women journalists track war crimes and put them online, forcing international media to pay attention. A new trend is “pilgrimages” by survivors to war crime courts in The Hague or Arusha, to press their cases on an international stage.
On the humanitarian front, UN agencies are pushing for integrated approaches. UNFPA and UNICEF co-run programs to train refugee police and health workers to identify and help survivors in camps. NGOs like Save the Children are involving men in anti-GBV campaigns, aiming to change attitudes. Even in Nigeria, Buhari’s administration in 2020 pledged a national action plan on sexual violence (though implementation remains spotty).
These steps matter because, as an Afrobarometer survey shows, Africans themselves rank GBV as their top women’s-rights concern. Over 80% of Africans now say their police will take GBV seriously reflecting growing expectations. International donors are also funding more GBV projects: the EU’s Spotlight Initiative and the UN’s Global Programme to End Violence against Women operate in multiple African countries now.
Yet caution is needed: progress can be reversible. Rising instability in the Sahel, Sudan’s civil war, and global distractions like the COVID-19 pandemic (which spurred domestic violence worldwide) threaten to sideline women’s issues. Indeed, the UNFPA report on CAR notes that funding cuts during the 2023 Sudan crisis led to the closure of several women’s safe spaces, leaving thousands vulnerable. And where violence continues or peace is fragile, survivors can fall out of sight.
Conclusion: Breaking the Silence
This investigation has uncovered a stark reality: in post-conflict Africa, gender-based violence remains both widespread and under-addressed. From remote Congo villages to over-crowded UN camps, women’s bodies became frontlines in wars that supposedly ended. Each country we studied – the DRC, South Sudan, CAR, Liberia, even Nigeria – exhibits a common pattern: violence against women did not end with ceasefires. Instead, it mutated into domestic abuse, forced exploitation, or languished in a vacuum of justice.
Real change will require confronting deep-rooted norms and power structures. Governments must implement the very recommendations of their truth commissions and laws. Security forces should be trained and held accountable, not just entrusted with aid budgets. Health and legal systems need resources to care for survivors. Above all, society must reclaim women’s dignity: survivors like Teresa and Mariam are not victims of “just the war” but of communities that still blame and ignore them.
Our findings underscore one urgent point: gender-based violence is not inevitable, but it is often tolerated. Across Africa, thousands of activists, lawyers, and community leaders are working to change that. Their voices and the voices of survivors must be heard.
As Ugandan human rights scholar Fatuma Ali warned: women and girls become “the battlefield between warring groups”, and unless African nations build capacity for justice, they will remain pawns in endless conflicts. Ending this hidden crisis will take vigilance from civil society, pressure from international partners, and a willingness to listen to those who suffered most.
The statistics and stories presented here are just the beginning. They show an urgent need for sustained attention: conflict may fade, but its violent legacy on women does not. Only by exposing and addressing this crisis head-on can Africa’s fragile peace truly heal.
Citations
All citations in this investigation correspond to verified sources gathered during extensive research across multiple continents and databases. Full documentation available upon email to support the accuracy and verifiability of all claims made.
- Doctors Without Borders / Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), “DRC: MSF report reveals explosion of sexual violence in 2023”, 1 Oct. 2024
- MSF press release, “Sexual violence is a persistent emergency in eastern DRC”, 11 June 2025
- UNFPA News, “‘Life is dangerous for women in this camp’: CAR survivors lose support as funding is slashed”, 19 Mar. 2025
- Al Jazeera (Osman Osman), “The plight of South Sudanese sexual assault survivors”, 10 Jul. 2019
- Justice in Conflict (Kelsey Rhude & Yah Parwon), “Will justice ever be realized?… Liberia”, 16 Nov. 2023
- Forced Migration Review (Amie Tejan-Kellah), “Establishing services in post-conflict Sierra Leone”
- Amnesty International, “Nigeria: Girl survivors of Boko Haram still being failed by government inaction”, 10 June 2025
- Human Rights Watch, “Rwanda: Shattered Lives” (1996 report)
- Afrobarometer (Fredline M’Cormack-Hale et al.), “Combating gender-based violence tops Africa’s agenda for women’s rights”, Dispatch No. 736, Nov. 2023
About Our Investigative Services
Seeking to expose corruption, track illicit financial flows, or investigate complex criminal networks? Our specialized investigative journalism agency has proven expertise in following money trails, documenting human rights violations, and revealing the connections between organized crime and corporate malfeasance across Africa and beyond.
Partner With Us for Impactful Change
Ready to drive transparency and accountability in your sector?
Our investigative expertise and deep industry networks have exposed billion-dollar corruption schemes and influenced policy reform across Africa.
Whether you’re a government agency seeking independent analysis, a corporation requiring risk assessment and due diligence, or a development organization needing evidence-based research, our team delivers results that matter.
Join our exclusive network of premium subscribers for early access to groundbreaking investigations, or contribute your expertise through our paid contributor program that reaches decision-makers across the continent.
For organizations committed to transparency and reform, we also offer strategic partnership opportunities and targeted advertising placements that align with our mission.
Uncover unparalleled strategic insights by joining our paid contributor program, subscribing to one of our premium plans, advertising with us, or reaching out to discuss how our media relations and agency services can elevate your brand’s presence and impact in the marketplace.
Contact us today to explore how our investigative intelligence can advance your objectives and create lasting impact.
Read all investigative stories from From Our Trackers Section.
